商标在先使用抗辩规则的理解和适用

发布时间：2018-06-20 03:25

本文选题：未注册商标 + 在先使用抗辩　；参考：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国,商标专用权通过申请注册取得,对在先使用的未注册商标进行保护没有充分的法律依据。在新《商标法》实施之前,理论界和实务界对商标在先使用抗辩是否成立一直存在不同意见。在先使用未注册商标面临着司法保护的困境,难以获得切实有效的法律保护。我国新《商标法》第59条第3款首次规定了在先使用抗辩,为在先使用的未注册商标人对抗侵权指控提供了具体可行的法律依据,较好地平衡了商标注册权人和在先使用人之间的利益,也有利于遏制抢注现象。由于新《商标法》第59条第3款的内容比较抽象,正确理解和界定商标在先使用抗辩规则,对保证其实践效果具有重要意义。本文从司法实践中商标在先使用抗辩的不同裁判观点出发,思考设立在先使用抗辩规则的必要性和理论依据,以比较法的视野分析了其他国家和地区保护未注册商标的方法,试图解释商标在先使用抗辩及其适用条件。
[Abstract]:In our country, trademark exclusive right is obtained by application for registration, and there is no sufficient legal basis to protect unregistered trademark. Before the implementation of the new Trademark Law, there have been different opinions between the theoretical and practical circles on whether the defense of trademark use before use is established or not. Prior use of unregistered trademarks faces the dilemma of judicial protection, which is difficult to obtain effective legal protection. Article 59, paragraph 3, of the new Trademark Law of China provides for the first time the defense of prior use, which provides a concrete and feasible legal basis for the unregistered trademark to fight the infringement charges. It balances the interests between the registered right owner and the prior user, and also helps to curb the phenomenon of preemption. Since the content of paragraph 3 of Article 59 of the new Trademark Law is relatively abstract, it is of great significance to correctly understand and define the rules of defending the use of trademarks in the first place in order to ensure its practical effect. Based on the different judicial practice, this paper thinks about the necessity and theoretical basis of establishing the rule of prior use of defense, and analyzes the methods of protecting unregistered trademarks in other countries and regions from the perspective of comparative law. Try to explain the first use of trademark defense and its application conditions.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】