继承协议制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-20 09:26

本文选题：继承协议 + 遗赠扶养协议　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：以继承权的赋予和抛弃为主要内容的继承协议制度起源于日耳曼法。但是因为该制度的规定和传统的遗嘱理论冲突,导致其在自己的发展和完善的道路上十分艰辛曲折。伴着社会不断进步发展,在继承习惯改变、立法背景变动、实现法律价值的侧重点等多种情况变化的影响下,在全世界法学界形成了关于继承协议的三种不同的立法态度,即肯定立法、否定立法以及折中立法。本文采用比较研究法、内容分析研究法、历史研究法等方法,对继承协议制度起源、发展、进步、完善等方面学界现存的不同立法态度和涉及到的理论问题进行研究,力求深入了解,以法学理论为出发点并结合司法实践获取在我国建立该制度的必要性和可行性,提出适合我国发展状况的立法构想,弥补现行继承法存在的真空地带。笔者将本文分为四个部分对继承协议制度进行了论述。首先,论述了继承协议的一般理论,包括继承协议的概念,继承协议的法律特征及其历史沿革;其次,对国外现存的三种继承协议立法例进行比较和研究,通过比较分析,借鉴持肯定立法态度国家的具体立法规制,提出在我国构建继承协议制度的构想。接下来,对我国建立继承协议制度的必要性和可行性进行论证。本章将继承协议制度与遗赠扶养协议和共同遗嘱进行对比,论证遗赠扶养协议与共同遗嘱制度的缺陷,并结合我国传统继承习惯与历史文化背景,研究分析我国建立继承协议制度在实践上的可行性。在文章的最后,主要论述了在我设立继承协议制度具体实施的立法构想。本文将我国的现实情况需求及继承习惯和国外相关立法结合,量身定做,提出了在我国设立继承协议制度方面的立法建议,用以弥补相关立法方面的空缺,在一定程度上规范民众设立继承协议行为的同时也为司法审判工作提供一定法律依据。
[Abstract]:The inheritance agreement system, which takes the inheritance right as the main content, originates from the Germanic law. However, because of the conflict between the regulations of the system and the traditional testamentary theory, the road of its own development and perfection is very difficult and tortuous. With the development of society, under the influence of the change of inheritance habits, the change of legislative background and the emphasis of realizing legal value, three different legislative attitudes about succession agreement have been formed in the world of legal circles. That is, positive legislation, negative legislation and compromise legislation. This paper uses the methods of comparative research, content analysis, history research and so on, to study the existing different legislative attitudes and theoretical problems involved in the origin, development, progress and perfection of the inheritance agreement system. In order to understand deeply the necessity and feasibility of establishing this system in our country with the legal theory as the starting point and the judicial practice as the starting point the author puts forward the legislative conception suitable for the development of our country and makes up for the vacuum zone existing in the current inheritance law. The author divides this article into four parts to discuss the succession agreement system. First of all, it discusses the general theory of succession agreement, including the concept of succession agreement, the legal characteristics of succession agreement and its historical evolution. Referring to the specific legislation regulation of the country with positive legislative attitude, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the inheritance agreement system in our country. Then, the necessity and feasibility of establishing succession agreement system in China are demonstrated. This chapter compares the inheritance agreement system with the legacy maintenance agreement and the common will, demonstrates the defects of the legacy maintenance agreement and the common will system, and combines the traditional inheritance custom and the historical and cultural background of our country. This paper studies and analyzes the feasibility of establishing succession agreement system in China. At the end of the article, it mainly discusses the legislative conception of establishing succession agreement system. In this paper, the author combines the needs of China's actual situation and inheritance habits with the relevant foreign legislation, and puts forward some legislative suggestions on the establishment of succession agreement system in China, in order to make up for the gaps in relevant legislation. At the same time, it also provides some legal basis for judicial work.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.5

【相似文献】