O2O顺风车的民事法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 03:56

本文选题：O2O顺风车 + 情谊行为　；参考：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：现阶段O2O顺风车日益普遍,走进越来越多人的生活。通过移动互联网平台,顺风车搭乘者发出搭乘请求,车主根据自己的出行路线和受惠方的信用情况,选择合适的搭乘者发出施惠请求,搭乘者根据车主的信用记录进行施惠应允,并且根据事先协议分摊一定的路费。这就是O2O顺风车的定义。现在城市面临了诸如交通拥堵、环境污染、能源紧缺等诸多问题,顺风车的出现既可以给人们的生活带来便利,又有助于解决这些问题。但是也不可避免的有可能产生一些纠纷,这种情况下,对这种拼车行为的民法特性的分析就显得极为重要,不同的定性就会给行为者双方产生不同的法律约束。所以本文对O2O顺风车相关的法律问题进行研究,分析其民法特性,情谊侵权行为以及对相关法律的完善给出一定的建议。本文分为四章,首先介绍了搭乘O2O顺风车的基本概念以及各国的发展情况。和传统顺风车相比,O2O顺风车有了一些新的特点,比如和传统的情谊行为相比,其行为双方很可能是不相识的两人。路费分摊也有了一定的协议标准,并且成为了施惠行为的一种潜在前提。而且O2O顺风车已经成为一种越来越普遍的利人社会行为,是民法需要促进导向的行为。这也是本文研究的意义所在。随后,本文对搭乘O2O顺风车的民法特性进行分析,这是需要确认的首要问题。O2O顺风车是一种标准的情谊行为,不是一种法律行为或事实行为,所以不可以把这种顺风车理解为一种有偿或者无偿的合同,更不涉及非法营运的问题。随后,本文分别运用特征分析方法和对比分析方法进行论证,这种顺风车行为满足情谊行为的主要特征。但是本文认为,O2O顺风车已经满足了情谊合同的一些属性,在相关法律不断完善以后,把这种普遍化又容易引起纠纷的情谊行为约束成情谊合同,不仅仅从道德角度,而是从法律角度加以规范和引导,也是一种合理的发展趋势。正因为现阶段搭乘O2O顺风车行为不具有法律约束性,所以更容易引起相关的情谊侵权行为。随后,本文要分析搭乘O2O顺风车的情谊侵权行为。包括行为双方应该注意的义务,一旦出现情谊侵权行为,就转变成了事实行为,这种情况下又将分析侵权归责原则。最后本文对O2O搭乘顺风车法律的完善给出一些建议。主要是完善信用互评机制,明确监管主体,明确责任问责主体。从法律角度对这种现象进行规范引导,并且保证行为双方的合法权益。另外对于O2O信息服务平台和行为人之间增加强制契约的约束,保护弱势群体的合法权利,推动整个行业的健康发展。
[Abstract]:At the present stage, O _ 2O is increasingly common, into the lives of more and more people. Through the mobile Internet platform, the rider sends a ride request, the owner according to his travel route and the beneficiary's credit situation, selects the suitable passenger to send the favor request, The rider agrees according to the owner's credit record and allocates the fare according to the prior agreement. This is the definition of an O _ 2O windmill. Nowadays, cities are faced with many problems, such as traffic congestion, environmental pollution, energy shortage and so on. The emergence of windmill can not only bring convenience to people's life, but also help to solve these problems. However, it is inevitable to have some disputes. In this case, it is very important to analyze the civil law characteristics of this kind of ride-sharing behavior, and different characterization will bring different legal constraints to both parties. Therefore, this paper studies the legal problems related to O2O, analyzes the characteristics of civil law, friendship tort and the improvement of relevant laws to give some suggestions. This paper is divided into four chapters. Firstly, the basic concept and the development of each country are introduced. Compared with the traditional one, the O2O hailing vehicle has some new features, for example, compared with the traditional friendship behavior, its behavior is likely to be two people who do not know each other. Road fare allocation also has a certain standard of agreement, and has become a potential premise of preferential behavior. Moreover, O _ 2O has become a more and more popular social behavior, and it is a kind of behavior that the civil law needs to promote. This is also the significance of this study. Then, this paper analyzes the civil law characteristics of O2O, which is the most important issue to be confirmed. O2O is a standard friendship act, not a legal act or a factual act. So we can't interpret this kind of car as a paid or unpaid contract, let alone the problem of illegal operation. Then, this paper uses the characteristic analysis method and the contrast analysis method to demonstrate that the main characteristics of the behavior of the windmill meet the friendship behavior. However, this paper holds that O2O has satisfied some of the attributes of friendship contract. After the relevant laws have been perfected, the generalized and disputable friendship behavior is bound into a friendship contract, not only from a moral point of view, but also from a moral point of view. It is also a reasonable trend to standardize and guide from the angle of law. Because of the fact that the O2O ride is not legally binding at the present stage, it is more likely to cause related friendship infringement. Then, this paper will analyze the torts of friendship by riding O _ 2O. Including the obligations that both sides should pay attention to, once the friendship tort appears, it will be transformed into the factual act, in which case, the principle of tort liability will be analyzed. Finally, this paper gives some suggestions on how to improve the law of O 2 O ride. The main purpose is to perfect the credit mutual evaluation mechanism, to clarify the subject of supervision and accountability. From the legal point of view, guide this phenomenon, and ensure the legitimate rights and interests of both sides of the act. In addition, for the O _ 2O information service platform and the actor to increase the constraint of compulsory contracts, to protect the legal rights of vulnerable groups, to promote the healthy development of the entire industry.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913

【共引文献】