不动产买卖合同之实际履行研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 04:43

本文选题：实际履行 + 请求权　；参考：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：实际履行作为违约救济措施之一被明文规定在我国《合同法》中,在每个阶段均呈现出鲜明的时代性特征。通过对我国实际履行制度发展脉络的梳理以及对域外英、德、日、台等国家(地区)的实际履行及其强制执行措施制度的比较,所反映出的共同趋势:在合同遭遇违约的情形下,实际履行作为违约救济措施是十分重要的,而在不动产交易的场合,更是不可或缺的。以往对实际履行的研究主要集中在债权层面,而本文从崭新的视角对不动产买卖合同的实际履行作深入的研究,分别从债权、物权、执行三个维度去对实际履行制度进行剖析。为了避免脱离实际、空洞的分析,本文采取实证研究的方法对深圳市各级法院关于二手房买卖合同实际履行的裁判态度和具体的做法进行量化分析,充分暴露出司法实践与理论之间存在隔阂所产生的问题,在此基础上从前述的三个维度进行分析讨论。首先,在债权的层面上,债权人行使实际履行请求权应当具有权利基础并满足适用的条件,且不能属于被排除适用的范畴。其次,在物权的层面上,物权变动模式存在有因的物权形式主义与债权形式主义的理论之争,经过分析前者优于后者,可在法律内部体系达致和谐、弥补司法实践存在的理论缺陷,对于交易安全也能实现良好的动态平衡,应成为我国物权变动模式的路径。再次,明确实际履行判决的性质为给付判决,判决具有具体内容即可付诸强制执行,在强制执行过程应当明确债务人何种义务是可替代与不可替代的,严格按照民事诉讼法上的规定进行执行。最后,笔者提出浅显的完善意见与思考,清除上述各层面存在的问题后,才实现每个环节的良好衔接。不动产买卖合同之实际履行的各个环节均能紧密衔接而又有充足的法律依据与法理基础作为支撑,形成内在统一的有机整体,即本文之所求。
[Abstract]:As one of the relief measures for breach of contract, actual performance is clearly stipulated in the contract Law of our country, showing distinct characteristics of the times in each stage. Through sorting out the development context of China's actual performance system and comparing the actual performance and the system of enforcement measures of the overseas countries (regions) such as Britain, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, etc. It reflects the common trend: under the circumstance of contract being in breach of contract, the actual performance is very important as a remedy for breach of contract, but in the case of real estate transaction, it is even more indispensable. In the past, the research on actual performance is mainly focused on creditor's rights, but this paper makes a deep research on the actual performance of real estate sale contract from a new angle of view, analyzing the actual performance system from the three dimensions of creditor's right, real right and execution respectively. In order to avoid deviating from reality and empty analysis, this paper adopts the method of empirical research to analyze quantitatively the judgment attitude and concrete practices of Shenzhen courts at all levels on the actual performance of second-hand housing sales contracts. The problems caused by the gap between judicial practice and theory are fully exposed and discussed from the above three dimensions. First of all, on the level of creditor's rights, the creditor should have the right basis and meet the applicable conditions when exercising the actual performance claim, and it can not be excluded from the scope of application. Secondly, on the level of real right, there is a theoretical dispute between the formalism of real right and the formalism of creditor's rights. The former is superior to the latter, and the harmony can be achieved in the internal system of law. To remedy the theoretical defects in judicial practice and to achieve a good dynamic balance for transaction security, it should become the path of the mode of real right change in our country. Thirdly, it is clear that the nature of the actual performance of the judgment is payment judgment, the judgment has specific content can be enforced, in the enforcement process should be clear what obligations of the debtor can be replaced and irreplaceable, It is strictly carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Civil procedure Law. Finally, the author puts forward simple and perfect opinions and thoughts to clear out the problems in each of the above levels before realizing the good connection of each link. The actual performance of the real estate sales contract can be closely linked with sufficient legal basis and legal basis as the support to form an internal unified organic whole, that is, what this article is looking for.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】