准不动产抵押质押法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 21:42

本文选题：抵押 + 质押　；参考：《云南财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在担保债权功能上,抵押和质押各有优势。现代社会,在充分挖掘抵押权的潜能的同时,也对其质权这一典型的动产担保方式充分利用。在我国现行立法上,抵押和质押的最大的区别点在于抵押不转移占有抵押物,而质押必须转移占有质押物。船舶、航空器和机动车等准不动产,本身具有动产的属性,又同不动产一样存在登记管理的规定。实践中,当事人以准不动产设定担保的,有的采抵押方式,有的采质押方式,甚至,有人对其不加以区分,造成了准不动产抵押与质押的适用的混乱问题。再加上对抵押和质押缺乏系统的认识,对其设立生效、物权丧失原因的不了解,导致权利人并不能有效运用准不动产的担保功能。本文将从案例出发,运用案例分析法、文献分析法、比较分析法和价值分析法等方法,依据民法的一般法理,从六个部分重新审视准不动产抵押质押制度。第一部分通过具体的案例引出了在实践中准不动产抵押抑或质押存在的问题;第二部分介绍了抵押、质押的概念、特征以及它们之间的联系与区别,并介绍了准不动产的概念特征及内容;第三部分从担保法、物权法以及相关的特别法介绍了准不动产抵押质押的立法现状;第四部分分析了实务中准不动产抵押质押存在的问题并对存在问题的原因进行分析;第五部分针对第四部分提出的问题提出完善建议;第六部分为结语,对全文进行总结。
[Abstract]:In the function of secured creditor's rights, mortgage and pledge have their respective advantages. In modern society, the pledge is a typical form of chattel security while the potential of mortgage is fully exploited. In the current legislation of our country, the biggest difference between mortgage and pledge is that mortgage does not transfer possession of mortgage, but pledge must transfer possession of pledge. The quasi-immovable property, such as ship, aircraft and motor vehicle, has its own property of movable property and has the same regulations of registration management as immovable property. In practice, some parties create security with quasi-immovable property, some adopt mortgage mode, some adopt pledge mode, and even some people do not distinguish it, resulting in confusion of the application of quasi-immovable property mortgage and pledge. In addition, the lack of systematic understanding of mortgage and pledge, the establishment of the effective, the loss of property rights do not understand the reason, leading to the obligee can not effectively use the security function of quasi-real property. Based on the general legal theory of civil law, this paper will re-examine the hypothecation system of quasi-real estate mortgage from six parts, using the methods of case analysis, literature analysis, comparative analysis and value analysis. The first part introduces the problems of quasi-immovable property mortgage or pledge in practice through specific cases, the second part introduces the concept, characteristics, relationship and difference between hypothecation and hypothecation. The third part introduces the legislation status of quasi-immovable property mortgage pledge from the aspects of security law, real right law and related special law. The fourth part analyzes the problems in the practice of quasi-real estate mortgage pledge and analyzes the causes of the problems; the fifth part of the fourth part of the problems put forward to improve the recommendations; the sixth part is the conclusion, the full text is summarized.
【学位授予单位】：云南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】