英国罚金判断新标准在我国违约金调减中的运用
发布时间：2018-08-02 18:51
【摘要】：大陆法系国家和英美法系国家在违约金问题上都面临着共同的困惑,即如何判断违约金是否过高,如何确定其判断标准。英国最高法院在2015年通过两个上诉案件,重构了其历史上存在一百余年的违约罚金判断标准,并确立了以"次要义务--正当利益--完全不成比例原则"为一体的新标准,从程序和实体两个方面对违约金是否过高进行判断。我国虽是大陆法系国家,但违约金调减权在司法实践的行使已经严重失范,英国法上新确立的罚金判断标准对于规范我国违约金调减权的行使具有重要的参考价值。
[Abstract]:Civil law countries and Anglo-American law countries are faced with common confusion on the question of liquidated damages, that is, how to judge whether the liquidated damages are too high and how to determine their judgment standards. Britain's Supreme Court, in two appeals cases in 2015, reconstructed its history of more than a hundred years of fine judgment for breach of contract, and established a new standard based on the principle of "secondary obligations-legitimate interests-total proportionality". Judging whether the penalty for breach of contract is too high from two aspects of procedure and entity. Although China is a civil law country, the exercise of the right to transfer and abatement of liquidated damages has been seriously lost in judicial practice. The newly established standard of fine judgment in English law has important reference value for standardizing the exercise of the right to transfer and abatement of liquidated damages in our country.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：2016年重庆市研究生科研创新项目《公共地役权制度在城市街区制建设中的优越地位及实现路径探究》(CYB16076) 西南政法大学2016年度学生科研创新计划项目《我国街区制改革中的法律路径选择——以公共地役权为视角》(2016XZXS-011)的研究成果
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913
，
本文编号：2160384
[Abstract]:Civil law countries and Anglo-American law countries are faced with common confusion on the question of liquidated damages, that is, how to judge whether the liquidated damages are too high and how to determine their judgment standards. Britain's Supreme Court, in two appeals cases in 2015, reconstructed its history of more than a hundred years of fine judgment for breach of contract, and established a new standard based on the principle of "secondary obligations-legitimate interests-total proportionality". Judging whether the penalty for breach of contract is too high from two aspects of procedure and entity. Although China is a civil law country, the exercise of the right to transfer and abatement of liquidated damages has been seriously lost in judicial practice. The newly established standard of fine judgment in English law has important reference value for standardizing the exercise of the right to transfer and abatement of liquidated damages in our country.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：2016年重庆市研究生科研创新项目《公共地役权制度在城市街区制建设中的优越地位及实现路径探究》(CYB16076) 西南政法大学2016年度学生科研创新计划项目《我国街区制改革中的法律路径选择——以公共地役权为视角》(2016XZXS-011)的研究成果
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913
，
本文编号：2160384
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2160384.html
