论不动产善意取得之善意要件

发布时间：2018-08-07 20:32

【摘要】：不动产善意取得是保护交易安全的一项重要法律制度,在不动产交易领域发挥着日益显著的作用。我国已于2007年颁布施行的《中华人民共和国物权法》中对其予以确认。不动产善意取得的构成要件之中善意要件为其核心要件,在不动产善意取得制度的运用中担当着至关重要的角色。文中表明不论是理论界还是实务界,对于善意要件的认知与理解,存在着仁者见仁、智者见智,甚至相互矛盾的尴尬现状,这对交易安全的保护与司法公正的维护将产生不利影响。正是基于以上对现状的认识,文章主要从善意判断之标准、善意证明之责任、善意认定之时间三个方面对善意要件进行了全面剖析。充分利用比较法与实证分析法,比较域外法律中善意规范的不同规定,明确我国理论界对善意的争议之所在,并分析了我国司法实践中所存在的乱象。文章对规范善意之认识与统一善意之标准进行了重新界清,在善意的判断标准方面,遵循以坚持信赖不动产登记簿公信力为主,尽其注意义务为辅的方案,并对注意义务予以客观化,以减轻主观因素的不确定性;在善意的证明责任方面,要求买受人负担证明责任,使其承担不能举证之不利后果;在善意的认定时间方面,应以申请登记的时间为准,以达到交易风险在买受人的控制范围之内。对善意要件解释的规范化、统一化,将势必为更好的保护交易安全、维护司法公正奠定坚实的基础。
[Abstract]:The acquisition of real estate in good faith is an important legal system to protect the security of transactions, which plays an increasingly prominent role in the field of real estate transactions. It has been confirmed in the Law of the people's Republic of China on Real right promulgated in 2007. Among the elements of bona fide acquisition of immovable property, the bona fide element is the core element, which plays an important role in the application of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. The paper shows that there are different opinions, different ideas and even contradictory embarrassing situations in the cognition and understanding of the bona fide elements, both in theory and in practice. This will have a negative impact on the protection of transaction security and the maintenance of judicial justice. Based on the above understanding of the present situation, the article mainly analyzes the bona fide elements from three aspects: the standard of goodwill judgment, the responsibility of bona fide proof, and the time of bona fide confirmation. This paper makes full use of the comparative law and the empirical analysis method, compares the different provisions of the bona fide norms in the extraterritorial laws, clarifies the dispute about goodwill in the theoretical circle of our country, and analyzes the confusion existing in the judicial practice of our country. This paper redefines the standard of understanding of good faith and unifying the standard of good faith. In the judgment standard of good faith, it follows the scheme of insisting on the credibility of the register of trust real estate, and making the duty of attention as supplementary as possible. In order to reduce the uncertainty of subjective factors, the buyer is required to bear the burden of proof so that he can not prove the adverse consequences. The time of application for registration shall prevail, so that the transaction risk is within the control of the buyer. The standardization and unification of the interpretation of bona fide elements will lay a solid foundation for the better protection of transaction security and the maintenance of judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】