论我国临床试验侵权责任的归责原则
[Abstract]:Since Shennong tasted hundred herbs, human beings have worked tirelessly to find ways to cure diseases. After thousands of years of exploration, human medical standards have been significantly improved. Especially after the 16th century, the new rise of western natural science, the invention of vaccinia vaccine and the discovery of penicillin have greatly reduced the human mortality rate. After entering the 20th century, human biomedicine is developing rapidly. The invention of cloning technology and the making of gene map make medical technology to a new level. It is undeniable that clinical trials have played an irreplaceable role in the progress of human medicine, but at the same time, the behaviors of clinical trials which are not in accordance with ethical norms and violate the rights of the subjects have aroused widespread concern. Due to the lack of legislation on tort liability of clinical trials in China, it is difficult to solve the tort cases of clinical trials reasonably. This article mainly studies the principle of liability for tort liability in clinical trials, and the principle of imputation determines the constitutive elements of liability, burden of proof, exemption conditions, principles and methods of compensation for damages, and the basis for lightening liability. Therefore, it is of great significance to establish appropriate imputation principle. This article carries on the analysis to this question through the following several parts. First, the summary of tort liability in clinical trials. The clinical trial is defined, and the classification and staging of the clinical trial are introduced. Then clinical trial infringement of the rights and interests, manifestations and duty bearers. Secondly, through the research on tort liability legislation of clinical trial in typical countries, some references to tort liability of clinical trial in China are obtained. Then it analyzes the current situation of tort liability legislation and judicature of clinical trial in China, and points out some problems existing in our country. Finally, according to the particularity of clinical trial tort, this paper classifies the tort liability of clinical trial. The principle of no-fault in non-therapeutic clinical trials is more consistent with the principle of law and can better protect the subjects. The tort of therapeutic clinical trials adopts the principle of presumption of fault which can balance the interests between the subjects with therapeutic interests and the research institutions.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 徐喜荣;;论人体试验中受试者的知情同意权——从“黄金大米”事件切入[J];河北法学;2013年11期
2 陈爱文;;我国人体试验无过错责任研究[J];现代商贸工业;2012年24期
3 满洪杰;;从“黄金大米”事件看未成年人人体试验的法律规制[J];法学;2012年11期
4 满洪杰;;论医学人体试验中的侵权责任——以比较法为视角[J];法学论坛;2012年05期
5 王丹;张广森;强美英;;论人体试验中知情同意的法律问题[J];医学与社会;2010年04期
6 陈小嫦;;台湾地区人体试验法律制度对大陆医疗技术人体试验立法的启示[J];中国医院管理;2009年01期
7 陈小嫦;;我国医疗技术人体试验立法的若干思考[J];医学与哲学(人文社会医学版);2008年10期
8 吴军;汤权;;新药人体试验致人损害民事赔偿诉讼中的法律问题[J];人民司法;2007年23期
9 王德彦;知情同意与人体试验[J];自然辩证法通讯;2004年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 邓蕊;医学人体研究伦理审查的哲学反思与制度实践路径[D];山西大学;2012年
2 满洪杰;人体试验法律问题研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 赵敏洁;未成年人参与医学人体试验之立法研究[D];福建师范大学;2013年
2 钟奇;人体试验法律问题探析[D];山东大学;2013年
3 宫闻雨;我国人体医学试验的法律问题研究[D];天津大学;2012年
4 黄锡娟;患者的医疗权利[D];复旦大学;2011年
5 罗勃;论患者知情同意权的法律规制[D];南京师范大学;2011年
6 雷启霞;论试药法律关系中的责任分配问题[D];山东大学;2010年
7 刘学民;人体生物医学研究侵权责任探讨[D];华中师范大学;2008年
8 王瑞涛;人体试药索赔法律问题探讨[D];西南政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:2179208
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2179208.html