专利侵权中的现有技术抗辩

发布时间：2018-08-18 15:47

【摘要】：随着我国经济的快速发展和国际经济交往的日益频繁,我国的各种发明创造和外观设计的数量不断增加,各种专利纠纷也随着日益增长,因此,现有技术抗辩原则作为被控侵权人抗辩原告的请求的一项重要原则也被越来越多的引用。但是,由于缺乏统一的规定和适用标准,导致各个法院对这一原则的理解不一致,从而同案不同判的现象时有发生,虽然2008年我国专利法经过修改以后对现有技术抗辩原则有了更加明确的规定,但是,由于各种学说和观点的存在,使这一规定在实际适用中仍存在这很多困难,因此,本文从我国已存的典型案例出发,针对目前我国关于现有技术抗辩原则的不同观点进行了分析,以期探究到一种统一的观点,从而为我国专利侵权案件的公正,公平审理做出微薄的贡献。本文总共五个部分组成:第一部分通过对典型案例的介绍,从而引出我国专利侵权中现有技术抗辩原则所存在争议的问题,从而为后面内容的展开做了铺垫和指引。第二部分对我国专利侵权中的现有技术抗辩原则的基本理论进行了深入的剖析,本部分总共包括现有技术抗辩原则的概念、意义、适用与等同原则等几个方面。专利侵权中的现有技术抗辩原则经历了较为长期的演变和发展的过程,由过去的“公知技术抗辩”、“已有技术抗辩”等称谓发展到今天的现有技术抗辩,这种发展变化符合了我国经济社会发展的需要,为我国专利纠纷案件的解决做出了卓越的贡献。第三部分主要介绍的是在相同与等同情况下的现有技术抗辩,这部分分别从相同情况下的现有技术抗辩和等同情况下的现有技术抗辩的描述,分析了在不同情况下的现有技术抗辩所存在的争议和问题,从而得出了不管是在相同侵权条件下还是等同侵权条件下都应当适用现有技术抗辩原则的结论。第四部分主要从现有技术抗辩的对比对象和对比标准两个方面论述了现有技术抗辩的对比问题。对一项现有技术还是几项现有技术结合起来与被控侵权技术进行对比、是就技术方案进行整体对比还是就技术特征进行对比这些问题进行探讨,从而得出在现有技术抗辩的对比问题上本文认为应当采取的统一的标准。第五部分对现有技术抗辩能否排除专利权的优先适用进行了深入的分析得出在司法实践中,法院应该首先确定被控侵权人使用的技术是否在原告专利权的保护范围之内,再依据被控侵权人主张的现有技术抗能否成立。这样做不仅可以实现被控侵权人和专利权人之间的利益平衡,也能够实现专利权人和社会公众之间的利益平衡。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and the increasing frequency of international economic exchanges, the number of inventions and designs in our country is increasing, and various patent disputes are also increasing. As an important principle of the accused infringer to defend the plaintiff's request, the existing technical defense principle has also been used more and more. However, the lack of uniform provisions and applicable standards has led to inconsistent interpretations of this principle by various courts, thus resulting in the occurrence of different judgements in the same case, Although the patent law of our country has more explicit stipulation on the principle of defense of existing technology after the revision of 2008 patent law, however, because of the existence of various theories and viewpoints, there are still many difficulties in the practical application of this provision. Based on the existing typical cases in our country, this paper analyzes the different viewpoints on the principle of defense of existing technology in our country, in order to explore a unified view, so as to bring justice to the patent infringement cases in our country. A fair trial makes a modest contribution. This paper consists of five parts: the first part, through the introduction of typical cases, leads to the controversial issue of the existing technical defense principle in patent infringement in China, thus paving the way and guiding the development of the latter content. The second part makes a deep analysis of the basic theory of the existing technology defense principle in patent infringement in China. This part includes the concept, significance, application and equivalence principle of the existing technology defense principle. The existing technology defense principle in patent infringement has gone through a long process of evolution and development. It has developed from the terms of "public technology defense" and "existing technology defense" to the existing technology defense today. This kind of development meets the need of our country's economic and social development, and makes outstanding contribution to the solution of patent dispute cases in our country. The third part mainly introduces the defense of the existing technology in the same and equal circumstances, which describes the defense of the existing technology in the same circumstances and the existing technology in the equivalent case, respectively. This paper analyzes the disputes and problems existing in the defense of the existing technology under different circumstances, and draws the conclusion that the principle of the defense of the existing technology should be applied under the same condition of infringement or the same condition of infringement. The fourth part mainly discusses the contrast of the existing technology defense from two aspects: the contrast object and the contrast standard. Whether to compare one existing technology or several existing technologies with the technology of alleged infringement, whether to compare the technical scheme as a whole or to compare the technical characteristics with these problems, In this paper, the author concludes that the standard should be adopted on the contrast of the existing technical defences. In the fifth part, the author makes a deep analysis on whether the prior defense of the existing technology can exclude the prior application of the patent right. In the judicial practice, the court should first determine whether the technology used by the accused infringer is within the scope of protection of the plaintiff's patent right. Then according to the existing technology of the alleged infringer can be established. This can not only achieve the balance of interests between the alleged infringer and the patentee, but also between the patentee and the public.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】