遗嘱执行人制度的构建
[Abstract]:The inheritance Law of our country was promulgated and implemented in 1985. It was formulated in the planned economy era. Because of the limitation of history and cognition, and the existence of the guiding ideology of "should be coarse rather than detailed" objectively in civil legislation. The provisions and contents of this law are too principled and crude. The Law has not been amended since its promulgation, and the opinions of the Supreme people's Court on the implementation of the succession Law of the people's Republic of China (abbreviated as "opinions on the implementation of the inheritance Law") have been in force since 11 September 1985. Nor has a new judicial interpretation been issued. With the development of Chinese economy and the promulgation of Real right Law, as well as the increasing complexity of social life and economic exchanges, the inheritance Law has been unable to meet the needs of protecting the private property rights and interests of citizens. Especially, China's inheritance Law has not established a perfect testamentary execution system, which makes many wills can not be realized according to the testator's true intention, can not give full play to the efficiency of the inheritance, and can not effectively resolve the disputes about testamentary succession. Through the research, this paper analyzes the value, qualification, production mode of the executor, combining with the present situation and existing problems of the executor system in our country, drawing lessons from the experience of foreign countries and other regions. It provides reference for perfecting the system of executor and succession of Civil Code in China. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part, the introduction of cases and questions raised. By designing and analyzing cases, this paper lists the possible problems in the absence of executors, and puts forward briefly the methods to deal with them, and then deduces the importance and necessity of constructing and perfecting the executor system. The second part, the value of executor system. This paper first introduces the different definitions of executor system by scholars, and then defines the concept of executor system. Secondly, it evaluates the opinions of different scholars on the legal status of executors, and puts forward their own views on the legal status of executors. Finally, it introduces the history of executor system and the value of constructing executor system. The third part, the comparative investigation of executor system. Through the analysis, the author compares the executor system and the testamentary trust system in Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and other countries, and provides reference for perfecting the legal system of executor in our country. The fourth part, the generation of executor. From the aspects of the qualification of executor, the way of producing and the appointment and rejection of executor, this paper expounds which organizations and personnel can be used as executor, the general way and special way of producing executor. And the manner in which the executor accepts office or refuses to take office. The fifth part, the executor's rights, obligations and responsibilities. This paper introduces the summarization of the content of the executor's rights, duties and responsibilities by various scholars and countries and regions, and analyzes it one by one, explains and puts forward his own views, and finally shows what rights the executor should enjoy. What are the obligations to be fulfilled, and what are the responsibilities to be assumed?
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏倪;;我国遗嘱执行人制度的完善思考[J];民营科技;2012年05期
2 叶英萍;李永;;遗嘱执行人地位及其权利义务[J];中华女子学院学报;2013年02期
3 赵立新;梁瑞敏;;从比较法的视角看中国遗嘱执行人制度的构建[J];河北学刊;2013年04期
4 苏倪;;论中国遗嘱执行人制度的立法完善[J];学园;2014年14期
5 高晓春;论遗嘱执行人[J];甘肃教育学院学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
6 张泽传;两大法系遗嘱执行人制度比较[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2002年02期
7 陈乃高;;试析遗嘱执行人的法律地位[J];中国司法;2008年05期
8 侯国跃;;我国遗嘱执行人制度的立法构想[J];法学杂志;2010年06期
9 陈凯;;应当建立公共遗嘱执行人制度[J];中国律师;2010年09期
10 王改萍;;关于完善我国遗嘱执行人制度的思考[J];山西警官高等专科学校学报;2012年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 北京市中凯律师事务所继承部主任 陈凯;遗嘱执行人能否随便解任[N];北京日报;2011年
2 公明财富传承管理集团 王硕;谁来制约遗嘱执行人[N];北京日报;2012年
3 贺轩 贵州大学法学院06级民商法研究生;论矿工遗嘱继承中的执行人[N];民营经济报;2008年
4 深圳特区报记者 何泳;老教师身后捐房助学一波三折[N];深圳特区报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 唐红光;论遗嘱执行人制度[D];山东大学;2007年
2 张晓燕;论我国遗嘱执行人制度的立法构想[D];复旦大学;2011年
3 王永波;遗嘱执行人制度研究[D];昆明理工大学;2012年
4 黄倩;我国遗嘱执行人制度重构研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
5 段燕;遗嘱执行人制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2013年
6 章寅莹;我国遗嘱执行人制度的立法完善[D];浙江大学;2013年
7 赵志英;论遗嘱执行人制度[D];甘肃政法学院;2014年
8 姚冰;遗嘱执行人制度研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
9 袁骁华;我国遗嘱执行人制度立法研究[D];福建师范大学;2015年
10 张伟;遗嘱执行人制度的构建[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
,本文编号:2191545
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2191545.html