表见代理的本人可归责性
发布时间：2018-08-22 18:50
【摘要】：在市场经济繁荣发展的今天,代理以其高效快捷性而被人们广泛应用,表见代理作为代理中一重要部分,在保护善意第三人利益,维护市场交易顺利进行等方面起到了重要作用。然而,关于表见代理构成要件的组成的争论一直没有停止。本文认为,在本人对代理权权利外观的产生没有任何可归责性的情况下,不应构成表见代理,那么由本人承担签订合同所导致的不利后果是不合理的,所以应当将本人具有可归责性应该纳入表见代理构成要件的考量范围。除摘要和结语外,本文共分为五个部分:第一部分由表见代理研究现状入手,重点论述我国表见代理的研究现状,司法现状以及法律规定的缺陷。同时就理论界主要存在几种学说“单一要件说”、“双重要件说”等进行论述。分析两种学说的优劣,提出将本人可归责性纳入表见代理的必要性。第二部分确定本人可归责性的讨论基础,从过错责任和无过错责任的一般理论出发,结合可归责性进行具体情况的分析,论述可归责性是本人承担责任的正当化依据。第三部分围绕善意取得与表见代理的对本人行为要求的不同以及法律后果的不同进行比较分析,提出在本人可归责性纳入表见代理更为迫切也更为合理。第四部分论述本人可归责性的判定,从“诱因原则”、“合理信赖原则”“风险分配原则”这三个原则入手,重点论述了风险分配与可归责性的具体判断和本人可归责性的行为样态。第五部分主要讲述了关于表见代理本人可归责性中的“风险原则”证明责任分配问题。本文对证明责任分配进行了详细论述,解决了司法实践中加重第三人举证负担等问题。
[Abstract]:Today, with the prosperous development of market economy, agency is widely used by people because of its high efficiency and rapidity. As an important part of agency, agency is protecting the interests of bona fide third party. Maintain the smooth conduct of market transactions and other aspects played an important role. However, the debate on the composition of apparent agency has not stopped. This article holds that if I do not have any imputation to the appearance of the right of agency, it should not constitute an apparent agency, then it is unreasonable for me to bear the adverse consequences of signing the contract. Therefore, I should be imputable should be included in the scope of consideration. In addition to the summary and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts: the first part begins with the present situation of apparent agency research, focusing on the current situation of our country's apparent agency research, judicial status and the defects of legal provisions. At the same time, there are several theories such as "single element theory" and "double element theory" in the theoretical circle. This paper analyzes the merits and demerits of the two theories, and puts forward the necessity of bringing personal imputation into apparent agency. The second part determines the basis of the discussion of imputability, starting from the general theory of fault liability and no-fault liability, combined with the analysis of specific circumstances of imputability, discusses that imputability is the legitimate basis for me to assume responsibility. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis on the differences of the behavior requirements and legal consequences between the bona fide acquisition and the apparent agency, and points out that it is more urgent and reasonable to include the apparent agent in the imputation of my own liability. The fourth part discusses the judgment of imputability, starting with the three principles of "inducement principle", "reasonable trust principle" and "risk distribution principle". The specific judgment of risk allocation and imputability and the behavior pattern of imputability are discussed. The fifth part mainly describes the allocation of burden of proof in the imputability of apparent agent. This paper discusses the distribution of burden of proof in detail and solves the problem of increasing the burden of proof of the third party in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2197995
[Abstract]:Today, with the prosperous development of market economy, agency is widely used by people because of its high efficiency and rapidity. As an important part of agency, agency is protecting the interests of bona fide third party. Maintain the smooth conduct of market transactions and other aspects played an important role. However, the debate on the composition of apparent agency has not stopped. This article holds that if I do not have any imputation to the appearance of the right of agency, it should not constitute an apparent agency, then it is unreasonable for me to bear the adverse consequences of signing the contract. Therefore, I should be imputable should be included in the scope of consideration. In addition to the summary and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts: the first part begins with the present situation of apparent agency research, focusing on the current situation of our country's apparent agency research, judicial status and the defects of legal provisions. At the same time, there are several theories such as "single element theory" and "double element theory" in the theoretical circle. This paper analyzes the merits and demerits of the two theories, and puts forward the necessity of bringing personal imputation into apparent agency. The second part determines the basis of the discussion of imputability, starting from the general theory of fault liability and no-fault liability, combined with the analysis of specific circumstances of imputability, discusses that imputability is the legitimate basis for me to assume responsibility. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis on the differences of the behavior requirements and legal consequences between the bona fide acquisition and the apparent agency, and points out that it is more urgent and reasonable to include the apparent agent in the imputation of my own liability. The fourth part discusses the judgment of imputability, starting with the three principles of "inducement principle", "reasonable trust principle" and "risk distribution principle". The specific judgment of risk allocation and imputability and the behavior pattern of imputability are discussed. The fifth part mainly describes the allocation of burden of proof in the imputability of apparent agent. This paper discusses the distribution of burden of proof in detail and solves the problem of increasing the burden of proof of the third party in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冉克平;;表见代理本人归责性要件的反思与重构[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2016年01期
2 戴永盛;;论不动产冒名处分的法律适用[J];法学;2014年07期
3 王浩;;表见代理中的本人可归责性问题研究[J];华东政法大学学报;2014年03期
4 叶金强;;表见代理中信赖合理性的判断模式[J];比较法研究;2014年01期
5 刘晓华;;权利外观责任的司法实现——以善意取得为视角[J];法学论坛;2013年04期
6 杨代雄;;表见代理的特别构成要件[J];法学;2013年02期
7 季秀平;;关于表见代理理解与适用的几个疑难问题[J];学习论坛;2011年12期
8 夏娇;;审判实践中表见代理的认定[J];青年文学家;2011年21期
9 罗瑶;;法国表见代理构成要件研究——兼评我国《合同法》第49条[J];比较法研究;2011年04期
10 周凯;;表见代理制度的司法适用——以涉建设工程商事纠纷为对象的类型化研究[J];法律适用;2011年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡巧绒;举证责任分配规则研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 许文苑;论表见代理构成要件之法律适用[D];华东政法大学;2016年
2 王媛媛;表见代理构成制度引入本人可归责性因素问题研究[D];华中科技大学;2013年
，本文编号：2197995
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2197995.html
