论房屋所有权转让预告登记在金钱债权执行中的法律地位

发布时间：2018-10-17 08:06

【摘要】：为使预告登记制度良性运作,我国《物权法》第20条第1款第2句所谓"处分"应包括民事执行措施。预告登记得排除强制处分,法释[2015]10号提出的"先查封后解除"方案,与《协助执行若干问题的通知》第15条第1项的价值判断相冲突,其正当性与可行性尚无确证。事实上,在预告登记义务人为被执行人的情形下,法院可借鉴轮候查封制度来处理预告登记与查封登记的衔接问题,即法院可依债权人的申请对已预告登记的房屋进行轮候查封。当预告登记权利人为被执行人时,依《协助执行若干问题的通知》第15条第3项,法院可依债权人的申请,"预查封被执行人购买的办理了商品房预告登记的房屋"。此处所谓"预查封"措施,应定性为对被执行人房屋给付请求权的扣押。我国应当借鉴德国法,尽快完善被执行人给付请求权执行制度。
[Abstract]:In order to make the notice registration system work well, the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 20 of our country's "property Law" should include civil execution measures. Notice registration may exclude compulsory punishment, and the scheme of "first seal and then release" put forward by law interpretation [2015] 10 conflicts with the value judgment of item 1 of Article 15 of "Notification to assist in the implementation of certain problems", and its legitimacy and feasibility have not been confirmed. In fact, when the obligor of notice registration is the executor, the court may refer to the waiting for closure system to deal with the connection between notice registration and seal registration. The court may, upon application by the creditor, queue for closure of a house registered with notice. When the owner of notice registration right is the executor, according to the third item of Article 15 of "notice to assist in the execution of some problems", the court may, on the application of the creditor, "pre-seal the house that the executor has purchased to deal with the notice registration of commercial housing". The so-called "pre-sequestration" measures should be characterized as the sequestration of the right to claim for payment of the house under execution. Our country should draw lessons from the German law and improve the execution system of the executor's right of claim as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】