论信息网络传播权的侵权判定
发布时间：2018-10-17 20:18
【摘要】：互联网技术的发展,将我们带到一个网络交织的世界,使许多作品产生了一种全新的传播途径,冲击着传统法律所构建的著作权保护制度。面对近年来愈发严峻的互联网侵权行为的发生,如何规范作品在互联网上的传播行为,进而有效维护互联网环境下著作权人及相关权利人的权利,成为当前立法、司法亟需解决的重大问题。当前针对著作权中的信息网络传播侵权行为大量发生,为了回应现实的需要,我国《著作权法》在2001年10月修订中明确提出了“信息网络传播权”的概念,使信息网络传播权的保护提到了前所未有的高度。不足的是此次修订仅仅对《著作权法》进行的局部微调,对这项权利的定义、概念和适用范围并不明确,导致法院在适用法律解决纠纷的过程中举步维艰,难以适从。鉴于此,为弥补《著作权法》的不足和漏洞,国务院在2006年7月制定了《信息网络传播权保护条例》(以下简称《保护条例》)。从规范的内容来看,该部法律结合各国最新的立法规定,较为详尽的规定了信息网络传播权的各项保护制度。但仍然存在前瞻性不足、利益的平衡化衡量不足和主动性不足等缺陷,2013年1月30日国务院又作出了修订《保护条例》的决定,2013年1月1日正式施行的《最高人民法院关于审理侵害信息网络传播权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》(以下简称《若干问题的规定》),信息网络传播权保护制度一直处于不断完善之中。本文将按照如下逻辑顺序进行论证。首先介绍信息网络传播权的概念、特点及立法概况,并通过信息网络传播权的规定引申出信息网络传播行为的概念、划分。信息网络传播行为按照主体的不同进行划分,分为作品等内容提供行为和网络服务提供行为,在此基础上将作品内容提供行为构成的侵权称为直接侵权,将网络服务提供的侵权行为称为间接侵权,并依据侵权行为的不同按照不同的归责原则进行处理。再次,分析信息网络传播侵权的例外,包括了合理使用、法定许可、默示许可及“避风港”规则。最后,针对现有信息网络传播权保护制度的不足提出完善建议:完善信息网络传播权侵权制度的归责原则、区分信息网络传播侵权责任与侵权赔偿责任、应当明确网络传播权侵权的赔偿标准。
[Abstract]:The development of Internet technology brings us to a world of intertwined networks, and makes many works produce a new way of dissemination, which impacts the copyright protection system constructed by the traditional law. In the face of the increasingly serious Internet tort in recent years, how to regulate the dissemination of works on the Internet, and then effectively protect the rights of copyright owners and related rights holders under the Internet environment, has become the current legislation. A major problem in the administration of justice that needs to be solved. In view of the large number of infringing acts of information network communication in copyright, in order to respond to the need of reality, the concept of "information network communication right" was clearly put forward in the revision of our country's copyright Law in October 2001. So that the protection of the right to information network communication has been raised to an unprecedented height. What is insufficient is that this amendment only makes some minor adjustments to the copyright Law, and the definition, concept and scope of application of this right are not clear, resulting in the courts struggling in the process of applying the law to settle disputes, and it is difficult to adapt to it. In view of this, in order to remedy the shortcomings and loopholes of the copyright Law, the State Council formulated the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication in July 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "regulations of Protection"). From the normative content, the Ministry of Law combined with the latest legislative provisions of various countries, more detailed provisions of the right to information network transmission of the protection of the system. But there is still a lack of foresight. On January 30, 2013, the State Council again made a decision to amend the regulations on Protection. The Supreme people's Court on the trial of the Information Network on infringement, which came into effect on January 1, 2013, was formally implemented. The provisions on the Application of Law in the Civil dispute cases of the right of Network Communication > (hereinafter referred to as "the provisions of several problems"), the system of protection of the right of communication of information network has always been in the process of being perfected. This article will demonstrate in the following logical order. Firstly, this paper introduces the concept, characteristics and legislation of the right of information network communication, and deduces the concept and division of the behavior of information network communication through the regulation of the right of information network communication. According to the different subjects, the information network communication behavior is divided into the content providing behavior and the network service providing behavior. On this basis, the infringement of the work content providing behavior is called direct infringement. The tort provided by network service is called indirect tort and is treated according to different imputation principle. Thirdly, this paper analyzes the exceptions to the infringement of information network communication, including reasonable use, legal permission, implied permission and "safe haven" rules. Finally, in view of the deficiency of the existing information network communication right protection system, the paper puts forward some suggestions: perfecting the imputation principle of the information network communication right infringement system, distinguishing the information network communication tort liability from the tort compensation liability. The standard of compensation for infringement of network communication right should be defined.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2277839
[Abstract]:The development of Internet technology brings us to a world of intertwined networks, and makes many works produce a new way of dissemination, which impacts the copyright protection system constructed by the traditional law. In the face of the increasingly serious Internet tort in recent years, how to regulate the dissemination of works on the Internet, and then effectively protect the rights of copyright owners and related rights holders under the Internet environment, has become the current legislation. A major problem in the administration of justice that needs to be solved. In view of the large number of infringing acts of information network communication in copyright, in order to respond to the need of reality, the concept of "information network communication right" was clearly put forward in the revision of our country's copyright Law in October 2001. So that the protection of the right to information network communication has been raised to an unprecedented height. What is insufficient is that this amendment only makes some minor adjustments to the copyright Law, and the definition, concept and scope of application of this right are not clear, resulting in the courts struggling in the process of applying the law to settle disputes, and it is difficult to adapt to it. In view of this, in order to remedy the shortcomings and loopholes of the copyright Law, the State Council formulated the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication in July 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "regulations of Protection"). From the normative content, the Ministry of Law combined with the latest legislative provisions of various countries, more detailed provisions of the right to information network transmission of the protection of the system. But there is still a lack of foresight. On January 30, 2013, the State Council again made a decision to amend the regulations on Protection. The Supreme people's Court on the trial of the Information Network on infringement, which came into effect on January 1, 2013, was formally implemented. The provisions on the Application of Law in the Civil dispute cases of the right of Network Communication > (hereinafter referred to as "the provisions of several problems"), the system of protection of the right of communication of information network has always been in the process of being perfected. This article will demonstrate in the following logical order. Firstly, this paper introduces the concept, characteristics and legislation of the right of information network communication, and deduces the concept and division of the behavior of information network communication through the regulation of the right of information network communication. According to the different subjects, the information network communication behavior is divided into the content providing behavior and the network service providing behavior. On this basis, the infringement of the work content providing behavior is called direct infringement. The tort provided by network service is called indirect tort and is treated according to different imputation principle. Thirdly, this paper analyzes the exceptions to the infringement of information network communication, including reasonable use, legal permission, implied permission and "safe haven" rules. Finally, in view of the deficiency of the existing information network communication right protection system, the paper puts forward some suggestions: perfecting the imputation principle of the information network communication right infringement system, distinguishing the information network communication tort liability from the tort compensation liability. The standard of compensation for infringement of network communication right should be defined.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 孔祥俊;;论信息网络传播行为[J];人民司法;2012年07期
2 陈锦川;;信息网络传播行为的法律认定[J];人民司法;2012年05期
3 张荣勤;;网络著作权侵权浅析[J];边疆经济与文化;2011年02期
4 杨静;;网络定时播放视频行为的司法认定探究[J];电子知识产权;2009年04期
5 刘军华;;论“通过计算机网络定时播放作品”行为的权利属性与侵权之法律适用——兼论传播权立法之完善[J];东方法学;2009年01期
6 梁志文;;信息网络传播权的谜思与界定[J];电子知识产权;2008年04期
7 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
8 郑成思;两个新的国际版权条约评介[J];外国法译评;1997年04期
，本文编号：2277839
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2277839.html
