人身安全保护令在基层组织实施中存在的问题及对策

发布时间：2018-11-01 13:24

【摘要】：人身安全保护令的相关规定实施已过一年,基层组织的实施研究还比较缺乏。相比于基层组织,更多研究着眼于妇联组织的反家暴活动。整体上看,对人身安全保护令的研究重点在保护令规定的法律完善和执行困境上。具体而言,在立法程序上,申请和执行程序正逐步完善,执行主体中公安机关的呼声最高。在司法介入的尺度上仍存争议,家暴的救济手段和非正式支持仍然紧缺。人身安全保护令对于解决家庭暴力案件意义重大,但由于申请和协助执行保护令的过程缺乏相应的法律指引,基层组织甚至其他执行机关在实施中依然存在障碍。本文旨在通过相关制度的分析和实践经验的总结,结合调研数据,为基层组织申请及执行人身安全保护令的程序和具体方案提出建议,联动其他部门共同促进执行保护令工作的落实,为人身安全保护令的施行提供明确的理论依据。本文通过三个部分对人身安全保护令在基层组织的实施问题展开论述。第一部分,着重分析人身安全保护令目前的发展状况,在理论上和实践中呈现出怎样的发展趋势,对调研数据进行分析;第二部分,分析基层组织实施中的影响因素,实施工作中存在的障碍;第三部分,从便于实施的角度出发,探讨实施中突出问题的解决策略。本文认为保护令实施中的主要问题在于,执行主体职能不明、外部支持缺乏,执行方式及措施有待明确,执行的后续监督难以保障。对此提出的主要解决措施是,增加与保护令相关的令状种类,主要以监督令为中心,目的在于解决相关组织、团体职能不清的问题。明确了基层组织在执行保护令中的监督位置,并设置了“监督人”的角色。对申请保护令时受害人的不同情况进行归类,将执行保护令前后的评估工作从程序上和内容上明确下来。进一步明确拒绝执行保护令和违反保护令的惩戒措施,并提出了针对受害人的救济方案。
[Abstract]:One year has passed since the implementation of the relevant regulations of the personal protection order, and the research on the implementation of the basic organization is still lacking. More research has focused on anti-violence activities organized by women's federations than at the grass-roots level. On the whole, the research on habeas corpus focuses on the perfection of the law and the difficulties of enforcement. Specifically, in the legislative procedure, the application and execution procedures are gradually improved, and the public security organs are the most vocal. There is still controversy in the yardstick of judicial intervention, and the remedies and informal support for domestic violence are still scarce. Personal security orders are of great significance in resolving domestic violence cases. However, due to the lack of corresponding legal guidance in the process of applying for and assisting in the enforcement of protection orders, there are still obstacles in the implementation of such orders by grass-roots organizations and even other enforcement agencies. The purpose of this paper is to put forward some suggestions on the procedure and specific scheme of applying for and executing personal security orders for grass-roots organizations through the analysis of relevant systems and the summary of practical experience, combined with the survey data. Other departments work together to promote the implementation of the protection order, to provide a clear theoretical basis for the implementation of the personal security order. This paper discusses the implementation of personal security orders in grassroots organizations through three parts. The first part focuses on the analysis of the current development of the personal security protection order, in theory and in practice what kind of development trend, to analyze the survey data; The second part analyzes the influencing factors in the implementation of grass-roots organizations and the obstacles in the implementation. The third part discusses the solutions to the outstanding problems in the implementation from the point of view of easy implementation. This paper points out that the main problems in the implementation of the protection order are that the main function of the executive body is unclear, the external support is lacking, the execution method and measures need to be clarified, and the follow-up supervision of the implementation is difficult to guarantee. The main solution to this problem is to increase the types of writ related to the protection order, mainly focusing on the supervision order, in order to solve the problem of unclear functions of the relevant organizations and groups. It clarifies the supervision position of grass-roots organizations in the enforcement of protection orders and sets up the role of "supervisor". Categorize the different circumstances of the victim when applying for a protection order and clarify the procedure and content of the assessment before and after the execution of the protection order. Further explicit refusal to enforce protection orders and disciplinary measures for violation of protection orders, and proposed remedies for victims.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】