土地财产权的二维构造——一种从现实出发的理论解释方案
发布时间：2018-11-03 07:35
【摘要】：目前关于土地问题的讨论容易陷入土地公有还是私有这一对立框架的理论迷思当中。基于一种从现实出发的理论解释路径,土地公有制不是一个抽象的名词和固定不变的理论预设,而在中国土地实践的历史和现实语境当中呈现出开放性的理论空间。从一种对土地公有制的积极理解出发,可能会支持某种强意义上的个人土地财产权主张,从而使土地公有制和个人土地财产权并不对立。基于詹姆斯·塔利提出的关于包容性权利和排他性权利这一对概念所构造的分析框架,土地财产权不仅呈现出国家所有的"共有"维度,而且必须特定化为个人所有的"个体"维度。这一对土地财产权的二维解读,不仅深度契合当下中国现实的土地制度设置,也是对中国宪法动态发展中所蕴含的那种财产权观念的一种理论阐释。
[Abstract]:The current discussion on land issues is prone to fall into the theoretical myth of whether land is public or private. Based on a theoretical interpretation path based on reality, land public ownership is not an abstract term and fixed theoretical presupposition, but presents an open theoretical space in the historical and realistic context of land practice in China. Starting from a positive understanding of the public ownership of land, it may support the claim of individual land property right in a strong sense, so that the public ownership of land and the property right of individual land can not be opposed. Based on the analytical framework proposed by James Tarly on the concept of inclusive and exclusive rights, land property rights not only show the "common" dimension of state ownership. And it must be specific to the individual dimension. This two-dimensional interpretation of land property rights is not only a deep agreement with the present Chinese land system, but also a theoretical interpretation of the concept of property rights contained in the dynamic development of the Chinese Constitution.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院、理论法学研究中心;国家"2011计划"·司法文明协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家“2011计划”·司法文明协同创新中心研究成果 吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题“法治与反腐倡廉长效机制建设研究”(2016LZY001);吉林大学基本科研业务费项目“需要一种权利理论:后权利本位论时代的权利研究”(2016QY020)的阶段性成果 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“权利视野下法治政府建设的理论与实践研究”(16JJD820005)
【分类号】：D923.2
本文编号：2307126
[Abstract]:The current discussion on land issues is prone to fall into the theoretical myth of whether land is public or private. Based on a theoretical interpretation path based on reality, land public ownership is not an abstract term and fixed theoretical presupposition, but presents an open theoretical space in the historical and realistic context of land practice in China. Starting from a positive understanding of the public ownership of land, it may support the claim of individual land property right in a strong sense, so that the public ownership of land and the property right of individual land can not be opposed. Based on the analytical framework proposed by James Tarly on the concept of inclusive and exclusive rights, land property rights not only show the "common" dimension of state ownership. And it must be specific to the individual dimension. This two-dimensional interpretation of land property rights is not only a deep agreement with the present Chinese land system, but also a theoretical interpretation of the concept of property rights contained in the dynamic development of the Chinese Constitution.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院、理论法学研究中心;国家"2011计划"·司法文明协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家“2011计划”·司法文明协同创新中心研究成果 吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题“法治与反腐倡廉长效机制建设研究”(2016LZY001);吉林大学基本科研业务费项目“需要一种权利理论:后权利本位论时代的权利研究”(2016QY020)的阶段性成果 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“权利视野下法治政府建设的理论与实践研究”(16JJD820005)
【分类号】：D923.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 黎桦;;论农民土地财产权的保障[J];湖北经济学院学报;2009年05期
2 杨小川;胡传景;;确权赋能 促进流转——关于保护农民土地财产权的思考[J];广东土地科学;2013年01期
3 张金明;;农民土地财产权的“权衡”与启示[J];山西农业大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
4 杨成;;论农民完整的土地财产权之法治价值[J];南都学坛;2014年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 曦昀;立法保障农民土地财产权[N];中国国土资源报;2013年
2 何兰生;谁也无权剥夺农民的土地财产权[N];农民日报;2012年
3 ;从法律上赋予农民土地财产权[N];浙江日报;2014年
4 本报评论员 周子勋;保障农民财产权利要有法律后盾[N];中国经济时报;2011年
，本文编号：2307126
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2307126.html
