论赃物的善意取得

发布时间：2018-11-07 19:48

【摘要】：善意取得在各国民法中都是一项非常重要的法律制度,我国的《物权法》中也对善意取得进行了明确的规定,而关于赃物能否适用善意取得却没有作出规定。从《物权法草案》中我们可以看出相关学者提出了这一问题,而在正式颁布的《物权法》中没有见到它的踪影,这是一件非常令人惋惜的事情。善意取得的本质是牺牲静的财产所有权,从而确保动态交易安全的顺利进行。善意取得能否适用于赃物是原所有权人的利益与善意第三人利益之间的权衡问题,正确的处理二者之间的关系是赃物能否适用善意取得的前提。本文就赃物的善意取得展开论述,文章主要分为四个部分。第一部分主要讲述了赃物善意取得的相关理论问题。首先对善意取得的理论问题进行了介绍；其次,从赃物入手,对赃物概念进行了界定、对赃物的特征与性质予以分析,还对占有委托物和占有脱离物进行了区分。第二部分主要讲述了外国和我国台湾的法律对赃物善意取得问题是如何规定的。国外关于赃物的善意取得主要有三种观点,即完全适用、完全不适用以及有条件的适用,而且文中还分析了各国采用不同制度的理由。第三部分主要介绍我国对赃物善意取得的立法评析。学者们对这一问题的看法各不相同,通过对各种观点的解析,最终笔者认为有条件适用赃物善意取得的观点是合理的,并对其合理性进行了分析。第四部分是关于赃物善意取得的法律完善。文章主要从立法和司法两个方面进行了完善,可以在立法上规定赃物善意取得的构成要件,以及在司法上出台相应的司法解释,即参照关于遗失物的规定处理赃物问题,并借鉴国外的公开市场原则,与此同时文中还规定了赃物的回复问题。
[Abstract]:Bona fide acquisition is a very important legal system in the civil law of various countries. In our country's Real right Law, there are clear provisions on bona fide acquisition, but there is no provision as to whether bona fide acquisition can be applied to stolen goods. From the draft of the Real right Law, we can see that the relevant scholars have raised this problem, but they have not seen it in the official Law of Real right, which is a very regrettable thing. The essence of bona fide acquisition is to sacrifice the ownership of property in order to ensure the smooth progress of the dynamic transaction. Whether the bona fide acquisition can be applied to the stolen goods is a trade-off between the interests of the original owner and the bona fide third party, and the correct handling of the relationship between the two is the premise of whether the stolen goods can be applied to the bona fide acquisition. This paper discusses the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods, the article is divided into four parts. The first part mainly describes the relevant theoretical issues of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. Firstly, the theory of bona fide acquisition is introduced; secondly, the concept of stolen goods is defined, the characteristics and properties of stolen goods are analyzed, and the distinction between possession entrustment and possession separation is made. The second part mainly describes how the foreign and Taiwan laws regulate the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. There are three main points of view about bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in foreign countries, that is, complete application, complete inapplicability and conditional application, and the reasons why countries adopt different systems are also analyzed in this paper. The third part mainly introduces the legislation evaluation of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in China. Scholars have different views on this issue. Through the analysis of various viewpoints, the author finally thinks that it is reasonable to apply the idea of obtaining stolen goods in good faith under conditions, and analyzes its reasonableness. The fourth part is about the legal perfection of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. The article mainly from the legislative and judicial aspects of perfection, we can legislate provisions on the acquisition of stolen goods in good faith, as well as in the judicial introduction of corresponding judicial interpretation, that is, referring to the provisions on lost property to deal with the problem of stolen goods, And draw lessons from the open market principle of foreign countries, at the same time, the article also stipulated the problem of the reply of stolen goods.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】