我国遗产范围问题研究
发布时间:2018-11-10 22:17
【摘要】:法治社会越发展,法律的社会功能就日益突出。法律调节不仅要考虑其法律效果,还要特别关注其可能带来的社会效果。自我国1985年制定《继承法》以来,我国自然人的财产类型已经大大超越了当时制定继承法时的情形,加之最近几年新型财产的不断涌现,《继承法》中规定的遗产范围已经远远不符合社会的发展。借此契机我们应该修改、完善我国《继承法》,而如何重新界定遗产范围、完善立法模式、对新型财产的可继承性问题予以确定,这些都是我们本篇文章所需要要关注和探讨的问题。本文笔者以提出问题、分析问题以及解决问题的逻辑思路进行谋篇布局。文章主要分为四章,主体部分主要是在第一章到第四章。第一、二章属于提出问题的部分。第一章通过对遗产定义以及特征的介绍,让读者对遗产范围存在的相关问题有一个清晰地了解;第三章是分析问题的部分,对外国遗产范围法律法规进行了借鉴和评析,主要是从大陆法系和英美法系两个角度进行研究和探讨;第四章是解决问题的部分,这一章与前面提出问题的第二章是相对应的关系,提出了解决我国现行《继承法》中遗产范围问题的对策,亮点主要是对一些新型财产的继承性问题进行了分析和探讨。
[Abstract]:With the development of the society ruled by law, the social function of law becomes more and more prominent. Legal regulation should not only consider its legal effect, but also pay special attention to its possible social effect. Since the enactment of the inheritance Law in 1985, the types of property of natural persons in our country have gone far beyond the situation when the inheritance Law was formulated at that time, and in addition to the continuous emergence of new types of property in recent years. The scope of inheritance stipulated in the inheritance Law is far from keeping with the development of society. Taking this opportunity, we should revise and perfect our country's inheritance Law, and how to redefine the scope of heritage, perfect the legislative model, and determine the inheritance of new property. These are the problems we need to pay attention to and discuss in this article. In this paper, the author proposes the problem, analyzes the problem and solves the problem by logical way of thinking. The article is divided into four chapters, the main part is mainly in the first chapter to the fourth chapter. The first and second chapters belong to the part that raises questions. The first chapter, through the introduction of the definition and characteristics of heritage, makes readers have a clear understanding of the problems existing in the scope of heritage; The third chapter is the analysis of the problems, the scope of foreign heritage laws and regulations for reference and evaluation, mainly from the continental law system and the Anglo-American legal system two angles of research and discussion; The fourth chapter is the part of solving the problem, this chapter is the corresponding relation with the second chapter of the previous questions, and puts forward the countermeasures to solve the problem of inheritance scope in the current inheritance Law of our country. The highlight is mainly to analyze and discuss the inheritance of some new property.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
[Abstract]:With the development of the society ruled by law, the social function of law becomes more and more prominent. Legal regulation should not only consider its legal effect, but also pay special attention to its possible social effect. Since the enactment of the inheritance Law in 1985, the types of property of natural persons in our country have gone far beyond the situation when the inheritance Law was formulated at that time, and in addition to the continuous emergence of new types of property in recent years. The scope of inheritance stipulated in the inheritance Law is far from keeping with the development of society. Taking this opportunity, we should revise and perfect our country's inheritance Law, and how to redefine the scope of heritage, perfect the legislative model, and determine the inheritance of new property. These are the problems we need to pay attention to and discuss in this article. In this paper, the author proposes the problem, analyzes the problem and solves the problem by logical way of thinking. The article is divided into four chapters, the main part is mainly in the first chapter to the fourth chapter. The first and second chapters belong to the part that raises questions. The first chapter, through the introduction of the definition and characteristics of heritage, makes readers have a clear understanding of the problems existing in the scope of heritage; The third chapter is the analysis of the problems, the scope of foreign heritage laws and regulations for reference and evaluation, mainly from the continental law system and the Anglo-American legal system two angles of research and discussion; The fourth chapter is the part of solving the problem, this chapter is the corresponding relation with the second chapter of the previous questions, and puts forward the countermeasures to solve the problem of inheritance scope in the current inheritance Law of our country. The highlight is mainly to analyze and discuss the inheritance of some new property.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 荣成;;继承人有清偿被继承人电费义务吗?[J];农电管理;2006年10期
2 李景林 ,熊裕武;试论被继承人债务的清偿[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);1986年01期
3 李玉珍;;继承人以外对被继承人扶养较多的人办理取得遗产公证的问题[J];法学杂志;1992年04期
4 ;继承人应否承担被继承人生前的个人债务[J];党员之友;1998年03期
5 荣成;对一起清偿被继承人电费债务纠纷案的评析[J];农村电工;2005年02期
6 刘淑珍;被继承人个人的财产才能继承[J];人民司法;1985年04期
7 杨震;;关于限制被继承人生前赠与行为问题的探讨[J];法学研究;1988年05期
8 ;法定继承人可以撤销被继承人的赠与吗?[J];山西老年;2012年01期
9 ;如何认定继承人虐待被继承人情节是否严重[J];伴侣(A版);2002年08期
10 梁燕初;;继承人如何领取被继承人的存款?[J];八小时以外;2002年09期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 倪晓晶;;浅析遗产债权清偿责任若干问题[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第4辑)[C];2008年
2 蒋超;倪s,
本文编号:2323707
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2323707.html