公众人物隐私权的保护与限制研究
发布时间：2018-11-13 09:08
【摘要】：随着现代社会权利意识的强化,作为人格权之一的隐私权,呈现出明显的扩张趋势。另一方面,新的网络和传媒技术又不断压缩人们的隐私空间,挑战着隐私权保护。对公众人物隐私权的保护和限制由是陷入了矛盾重生又岌岌可危的境地。我国对隐私权的保护相对滞后,立法中尚无关于公众人物隐私权的相关规定,这直接导致在侵权案件频发的当下,司法裁判无章可循的混乱。本文以公众人物的隐私权为研究对象,通过理论分析和比较研究的方法,从类型化的视角探讨对其进行限制与保护的原则、范围,旨在为规范我国的公众人物隐私权保护与限制提供些许参考和理论支撑。除绪论与结论部分外,本文的分析和论述过程分四个部分。第二章是对研究公众人物的隐私权所涉及的基本问题进行界定。在分别介绍了隐私权与公众人物的定义,并对公众人物进行类型化区分；之后,通过分析总结出公众人物的隐私权区别于一般意义上的隐私权的特征；最后提出人格自由与人格尊严、权利不得滥用和秩序是公众人物的隐私权所保护的价值所在。第三章是对公众人物的隐私权进行保护和限制的范围的理论探讨。该部分从基本原则出发,对上文提出的不同类型的公众人物的隐私权的保护与限制范围进行了论述。利益衡量原则是对公众人物的隐私权进行必要限制的正当性的根本来源,同时根据不同的类型,还要考虑对权利让渡的推定,并以公共利益或者公众的合理兴趣为最终判断标准。不同类型的公众人物,隐私权受到公共利益等原则限制的程度也应该有所区别。第四章是对公众人物的隐私权问题的比较法研究。分析并阐述了我国对公众人物隐私权进行法律保护和限制存在的缺陷,同时对美国、德国和英国在这一方面的立法进行了介绍,进而总结了国外立法例对我国相关立法完善的一些重要启示。第五章提出了规范我国公众人物隐私权的法律保护和限制的建议。以《人格权法》制定为蓝图,结合前文对研究内容的论述和比较研究,提出完善我国隐私权法律保护,进而构建区分不同类型的公众人物隐私权法律保护与限制框架的设想。
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of the consciousness of right in modern society, the right of privacy, as one of personality rights, shows an obvious tendency of expansion. On the other hand, the new network and media technology constantly compressed people's privacy space, challenging the privacy protection. The protection and restriction of the privacy right of public figures fall into contradictory rebirth and perilous situation. The protection of privacy in our country lags behind, and there are no relevant provisions on the privacy of public figures in the legislation, which directly leads to the confusion of the judicial decision with no rules to follow when the infringement cases occur frequently. This paper takes the privacy of public figures as the research object, through theoretical analysis and comparative research methods, from the perspective of typology to explore the principles and scope of its limitation and protection. The aim is to provide some reference and theoretical support for regulating the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the analysis and discussion of the process is divided into four parts. The second chapter defines the basic issues involved in the study of the privacy of public figures. After introducing the definition of the right to privacy and the public figure, and classifying the public figure, the author summarizes the characteristics of the privacy right of the public figure which is different from the privacy right in the general sense. Finally, the author points out that the value of the privacy of public figures lies in the freedom and dignity of personality, the right not to be abused and the order. The third chapter discusses the scope of the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures. Based on the basic principles, this part discusses the protection and limitation of the privacy of different types of public figures mentioned above. The principle of interest measurement is the fundamental source of the legitimacy of the necessary restrictions on the privacy of public figures, and the presumption of the transfer of rights should be considered according to different types. And take the public interest or the public reasonable interest as the final judgment standard. For different types of public figures, the right to privacy should be restricted by principles such as public interest. The fourth chapter is a comparative study on the privacy of public figures. This paper analyzes and expounds the defects of the legal protection and restriction of the privacy rights of public figures in China, and introduces the legislation of the United States, Germany and Britain in this respect. And then summarizes some important enlightenment of foreign legislation cases on the improvement of relevant legislation in China. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions to regulate the legal protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. Based on the blueprint of the Law of Personality Rights, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the legal protection of the right of privacy in China and constructing the legal protection and restriction framework of the privacy rights of different types of public figures in combination with the previous discussion and comparative study on the contents of the study.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2328648
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of the consciousness of right in modern society, the right of privacy, as one of personality rights, shows an obvious tendency of expansion. On the other hand, the new network and media technology constantly compressed people's privacy space, challenging the privacy protection. The protection and restriction of the privacy right of public figures fall into contradictory rebirth and perilous situation. The protection of privacy in our country lags behind, and there are no relevant provisions on the privacy of public figures in the legislation, which directly leads to the confusion of the judicial decision with no rules to follow when the infringement cases occur frequently. This paper takes the privacy of public figures as the research object, through theoretical analysis and comparative research methods, from the perspective of typology to explore the principles and scope of its limitation and protection. The aim is to provide some reference and theoretical support for regulating the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the analysis and discussion of the process is divided into four parts. The second chapter defines the basic issues involved in the study of the privacy of public figures. After introducing the definition of the right to privacy and the public figure, and classifying the public figure, the author summarizes the characteristics of the privacy right of the public figure which is different from the privacy right in the general sense. Finally, the author points out that the value of the privacy of public figures lies in the freedom and dignity of personality, the right not to be abused and the order. The third chapter discusses the scope of the protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures. Based on the basic principles, this part discusses the protection and limitation of the privacy of different types of public figures mentioned above. The principle of interest measurement is the fundamental source of the legitimacy of the necessary restrictions on the privacy of public figures, and the presumption of the transfer of rights should be considered according to different types. And take the public interest or the public reasonable interest as the final judgment standard. For different types of public figures, the right to privacy should be restricted by principles such as public interest. The fourth chapter is a comparative study on the privacy of public figures. This paper analyzes and expounds the defects of the legal protection and restriction of the privacy rights of public figures in China, and introduces the legislation of the United States, Germany and Britain in this respect. And then summarizes some important enlightenment of foreign legislation cases on the improvement of relevant legislation in China. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions to regulate the legal protection and limitation of the privacy of public figures in China. Based on the blueprint of the Law of Personality Rights, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the legal protection of the right of privacy in China and constructing the legal protection and restriction framework of the privacy rights of different types of public figures in combination with the previous discussion and comparative study on the contents of the study.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 王玮;权利让渡原则与社会稳定[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2000年02期
2 张新宝;;隐私权研究[J];法学研究;1990年03期
，本文编号：2328648
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2328648.html
