论遗产债务的清偿程序
发布时间：2018-11-29 13:43
【摘要】：随着民间债权债务关系趋于复杂化和多样化,自然人死后其遗产债务纠纷也开始变得复杂和多样,遗产债务清偿问题成为了司法实践中的一个难题。对于如何解决遗产债务清偿问题,我国众多学者从立法的角度对如何进行制度设计以及如何进行立法提出了众多观点,并展开了大量论述,但是却鲜有学者论及如何依据现有立法规定来妥善处理遗产债务纠纷。立法未行,但实践中遗产债务清偿案件却不断发生,虽然完善立法是解决遗产债务清偿问题的最终办法,但是探讨如何在现有立法条件下妥善解决遗产债务纠纷,则能解当前司法实践中的燃眉之急。因此,本文拟在现有立法规定的基础之上,对如何依照或参照有关法律规定妥善解决遗产债务清偿问题进行探讨,希望能够对司法实践中解决该问题提供帮助。本文共有个三部分,约25000字。第一部分为我国遗产债务清偿的立法现状及司法困境。本部分主要探讨了我国在遗产债务清偿方面的立法现状,介绍了司法实践中处理遗产债务清偿案件的一般做法,概括出了我国在遗产债务清偿方面的立法特点及司法上存在的问题。第二部分为港澳台地区及外国的遗产债务清偿制度。本部分主要探讨了我国港澳台地区以及一些发达国家的立法经验,介绍了港澳台地区及外国的立法成果与实务经验,包括遗产债务的范围、直接和间接继承制度、遗产管理制度、遗产清册制度、遗产债务清偿顺序等。通过这一部分的写作,有利于对我国的遗产债务清偿制度进行比较研究,为第三部分的写作提供参考。第三部分为遗产债务清偿程序的完善。该部分是在前两部分的基础之上,提出如何在现有立法条件下妥善解决遗产债务清偿案件的方案。本部分论述的内容包括:应否以及如何进行遗产债权人登记;如何采用符合遗产债务清偿案件特点的特殊审理方法;如何确定各种遗产债务的清偿顺序;遗产债务清偿案件中的调解应当遵循哪些特殊规则。总之,依据现有立法规定来对遗产债务清偿问题进行探讨是本文法人基本前提,本文的宗旨即是要在承认现有立法存在不足的基础之上,探讨如何从现有立法规定中寻找依据来妥善处理遗产债务清偿案件。
[Abstract]:With the complexity and diversification of the relationship between the private creditor's rights and the debt, the disputes of the natural person's estate debt become complex and diverse, and the settlement of the estate debt becomes a difficult problem in the judicial practice. As to how to solve the problem of settlement of legacy debt, many scholars in our country have put forward many viewpoints on how to design the system and how to legislate from the angle of legislation, and have carried out a large number of discussions. However, few scholars have discussed how to properly deal with disputes over estate debts according to existing legislation. Although perfecting legislation is the ultimate solution to the problem of settlement of legacy debt, it discusses how to properly solve the disputes of estate debt under the existing legislative conditions. It can solve the urgent need in the current judicial practice. Therefore, on the basis of the existing legislative provisions, this paper discusses how to properly solve the problem of settlement of estate debts in accordance with or referring to the relevant legal provisions, hoping to help solve this problem in judicial practice. This paper has three parts, about 25000 words. The first part is the legislative situation and judicial dilemma of the settlement of our country's estate debt. This part mainly discusses the current situation of legislation on settlement of estate debts in China, and introduces the general practice of dealing with cases of settlement of legacy debts in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the legislative characteristics and judicial problems in the settlement of estate debts in China. The second part is the legacy debt settlement system of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries. This part mainly discusses the legislative experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in China and some developed countries, and introduces the legislative achievements and practical experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries, including the scope of legacy debt, direct and indirect inheritance system. Estate management system, estate inventory system, legacy debt settlement order, etc. The writing of this part is conducive to the comparative study of the system of settlement of legacy debts in China, and provides a reference for the third part of writing. The third part is the perfection of the procedure of settlement of estate debts. On the basis of the first two parts, this part puts forward the scheme of how to settle the case of settlement of estate debt properly under the condition of existing legislation. The contents of this part include: whether and how to register the estate creditors, how to adopt the special trial method which accords with the characteristics of the settlement cases of the estate debts, how to determine the order of settlement of the various kinds of estate debts; What special rules should be followed in settlement of estate debts. In a word, it is the basic premise of this article to discuss the settlement of estate debt according to the existing legislation. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the deficiency of the existing legislation. This paper probes into how to find the basis from the existing legislation to properly deal with the settlement of estate debts.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.5
本文编号：2365147
[Abstract]:With the complexity and diversification of the relationship between the private creditor's rights and the debt, the disputes of the natural person's estate debt become complex and diverse, and the settlement of the estate debt becomes a difficult problem in the judicial practice. As to how to solve the problem of settlement of legacy debt, many scholars in our country have put forward many viewpoints on how to design the system and how to legislate from the angle of legislation, and have carried out a large number of discussions. However, few scholars have discussed how to properly deal with disputes over estate debts according to existing legislation. Although perfecting legislation is the ultimate solution to the problem of settlement of legacy debt, it discusses how to properly solve the disputes of estate debt under the existing legislative conditions. It can solve the urgent need in the current judicial practice. Therefore, on the basis of the existing legislative provisions, this paper discusses how to properly solve the problem of settlement of estate debts in accordance with or referring to the relevant legal provisions, hoping to help solve this problem in judicial practice. This paper has three parts, about 25000 words. The first part is the legislative situation and judicial dilemma of the settlement of our country's estate debt. This part mainly discusses the current situation of legislation on settlement of estate debts in China, and introduces the general practice of dealing with cases of settlement of legacy debts in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the legislative characteristics and judicial problems in the settlement of estate debts in China. The second part is the legacy debt settlement system of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries. This part mainly discusses the legislative experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in China and some developed countries, and introduces the legislative achievements and practical experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries, including the scope of legacy debt, direct and indirect inheritance system. Estate management system, estate inventory system, legacy debt settlement order, etc. The writing of this part is conducive to the comparative study of the system of settlement of legacy debts in China, and provides a reference for the third part of writing. The third part is the perfection of the procedure of settlement of estate debts. On the basis of the first two parts, this part puts forward the scheme of how to settle the case of settlement of estate debt properly under the condition of existing legislation. The contents of this part include: whether and how to register the estate creditors, how to adopt the special trial method which accords with the characteristics of the settlement cases of the estate debts, how to determine the order of settlement of the various kinds of estate debts; What special rules should be followed in settlement of estate debts. In a word, it is the basic premise of this article to discuss the settlement of estate debt according to the existing legislation. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the deficiency of the existing legislation. This paper probes into how to find the basis from the existing legislation to properly deal with the settlement of estate debts.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒙冬梅;;论遗产债务的清偿[J];广西师范学院学报;2006年02期
2 秦琴,徐秉晖,袁文全;论遗产债务的清偿[J];重庆工学院学报;2001年03期
3 马钰凤;;我国遗产债务清偿顺序之重构[J];湖北社会科学;2011年04期
4 姜大伟;;我国遗产债务清偿顺序探析[J];湖北社会科学;2012年10期
5 杜江涌;;我国遗产债务清偿顺序的立法构想[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2008年05期
6 陈苇;;我国遗产债务清偿顺序的立法构建[J];法学;2012年08期
7 单国胜;;继承了父亲的公司 公司的债务就由我一人偿还吗[J];新农村;2007年04期
8 ;放弃继承权的继承人可以请求分得遗产的继承人补偿其履行的遗产债务[J];司法业务文选;2006年21期
9 郭腾文;;论遗产债务清偿范围[J];新经济;2013年09期
10 张力;遗产债务清偿的顺序[J];广西社会科学;2003年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 山东省威海市环翠区人民法院 解品彩;被执行人已死亡 本案中债务如何清偿[N];建筑时报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杜江涌;遗产债务制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 王欢;论遗产债务的清偿[D];黑龙江大学;2015年
2 曾驯;论遗产债务的清偿程序[D];西南政法大学;2015年
3 宋婷婷;论遗产债务的清偿[D];辽宁大学;2010年
4 杨金锁;遗产债权人利益保护问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2011年
，本文编号：2365147
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2365147.html
