论作品实质性相似和版权侵权判定的路径选择——约减主义与整体概念和感觉原则

发布时间：2018-12-18 21:47

【摘要】："约减主义"与"整体概念和感觉原则"是判断实质性相似和版权侵权的两种不同路径,前者在确定客体可版权性范围的时候主张对作品进行分析和解构,后者则从整体上对该范围进行确定,适用上述两种不同的分析路径所导致的版权保护范围实际上是不同的。约减主义通常适用于文字作品中,整体概念与感觉原则通常适用于视觉艺术作品与音乐作品中。为防止整体概念与感觉原则的适用不适当地扩大版权保护范围,在视觉艺术作品与音乐作品的场合,即使存在整体概念与感觉相近的嫌疑,尚须考察引发这种嫌疑的因素,其如果是不具有可版权性的要素,版权侵权不成立;反之,如果是具有可版权性的要素,版权侵权成立。
[Abstract]:"reductionism" and "whole concept and feeling principle" are two different ways to judge substantive similarity and copyright infringement. The former advocates the analysis and deconstruction of works when determining the scope of object copyright. The latter determines the scope as a whole, and the scope of copyright protection caused by the application of the two different analysis paths is actually different. Reductionism usually applies to written works, while holistic concepts and sensations are usually applied to visual and musical works. In order to prevent the application of the whole concept and the feeling principle from unduly extending the scope of copyright protection, in the case of visual and musical works, even if there is a suspicion that the whole concept is similar to the feeling, the factors that give rise to such suspicion need to be examined. If it is not copyrightable elements, copyright infringement does not hold; Conversely, if it is a copyrightable element, copyright infringement is established.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：对外经济贸易大学学科建设专项经费资助(项目编号:XK2014406) 2013年度北京市哲学社会科学规划项目“北京市文化创意产业保护的立法研究”(项目编号:13FXC037) 北京高等学校“青年英才计划(2013)”(项目编号:YETP0919)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】