预告登记之客体研究

发布时间：2019-01-08 13:17

【摘要】：预告登记制度对以物权变动为目的债权请求权具有不可替代的保障权利得以实现的功能,该制度在国外民法上已有较长的历史,但我国直到2007年《物权法》颁布,才第一次在法律制度上正式确立了预告登记制度,该制度在我国民法上还是一项崭新的制度。目前,我国学者在对哪些权利应作为预告登记的客体的问题上依然存在分歧。通过对各国法关于预告登记制度客体的规定来看,规定了该制度的国家和地区作为确定该制度客体的主要依据是该国的物权变动模式、权利自身或请求权客体是否具有登记能力、能否及时进行本登记。本文对我国法上应作为预告登记的客体进行了系统的研究,针对我国对不动产物权变动采登记生效和登记对抗并存的立法模式,认为应在不动产物权变动的登记生效的统一立法模式下,确定预告登记客体。因此,在我国不动产物权变动采登记生效模式的前提下,不动产所有权、抵押权、土地使用权等物权,只要相关物权变动不能及时办理本登记,以该物权变动为目的的债权请求权就有权利保全的需求,应允许进行预告登记。而在我国不动产租赁权、建设工程价款优先受偿权等却因为权利本身的缺陷及其特点,笔者认为不应作为预告登记客体。
[Abstract]:The notice registration system has an irreplaceable function to guarantee the right to claim for the purpose of the change of real right. The system has a long history in the foreign civil law, but it was promulgated in 2007 in our country. For the first time, the notice registration system was formally established in the legal system, which is still a new system in the civil law of our country. At present, Chinese scholars still disagree on which rights should be the object of notice registration. From the point of view of the provisions on the object of the notice registration system in the laws of various countries, it is stipulated that the main basis of the determination of the object of the system is the real right change mode of that country as the country and the region of the system. Whether the right itself or the object of the claim has the ability to register, and whether the registration can be carried out in time. This article has carried on the systematic research to our country law should be the object of the notice registration, aimed at our country to the real estate property right change registration to adopt the registration to take effect and the registration confrontation coexisting legislation pattern. The author thinks that the object of notice registration should be determined under the unified legislative mode of registration of real property right change. Therefore, under the premise of the effective registration mode of real property right change in our country, real estate ownership, mortgage, land use right and other property rights, as long as the relevant real right changes cannot handle this registration in time, For the purpose of the change of real right, the claim right has the demand of right preservation, and it should be allowed to register with notice. However, because of the defects and characteristics of the right itself, the author thinks that it should not be regarded as the object of notice registration.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】