我国民法地域效力立法之检讨——以《中华人民共和国民法通则》第8条第1款为中心

发布时间：2019-02-19 16:20

【摘要】：《中华人民共和国民法通则》第8条第1款"在中国领域内的民事活动适用中国法,法律另有规定的除外"的规定为当下数个民法典专家建议稿和十余部现行民事法律所沿袭,俨然成为我国民法地域效力的立法范本和民法学的智识"正统"。然而,此种旨在宣示国家属地主权的简单规定早已不合时宜,与国际私法规则相互矛盾。我国早期的学者和立法曾经正确认识和解决了民法地域效力问题,现今的规定源自特殊历史背景下不自觉师法苏俄民法的立法草案。界定民法地域效力是国际私法的根本使命,国外立法有多种模式可供选择。我国宜采取单行法模式,在民法典制定之际打造与民事实体法和谐共振的先进国际私法立法。
[Abstract]:Article 8, paragraph 1, of the General principles of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China, "the application of Chinese law to civil activities in the territory of China, except as otherwise provided in the law," has been inherited by several current civil code experts' proposals and more than ten existing civil laws. It has become the legislative model of regional validity of civil law and the intellectual orthodoxy of civil law. However, such a simple provision purporting to declare national territorial sovereignty is anachronistic and contradictory to the rules of private international law. The early scholars and legislation of our country have correctly understood and solved the problem of the territorial validity of civil law, and the present provisions are derived from the draft legislation of the Soviet civil law under the special historical background. Defining the territorial validity of civil law is the fundamental mission of private international law. China should adopt the mode of single law and make advanced private international law legislation harmonious and resonant with civil substantive law at the time of making civil code.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BFX138) 教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目(11YJA820091) 德国马克斯·普朗克比较法与国际私法研究所国外访问学者资助项目
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】