当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

计算机软件著作权侵权行为的认定

发布时间:2019-03-29 08:14
【摘要】:随着高科技的快速发展,尤其是计算机软件技术的不断进步,软件的功能越来越多,越来越超越人们的想象,并伴随着互联网的发展改变了现代社会人类的生活。计算机软件代表了信息时代的主要特征,在生活方面,它给人们带来了各种新的娱乐方式和信息沟通方式,不断创造丰富的精神产品;在工作方面,它强大的信息处理能力和无纸化办公等彻底改变了人们的工作方式,提高了工作效率。不仅如此,计算机软件产业每年能为社会创造非常可观的经济效益,其在一个国家的各个行业都发挥着举足轻重的作用。这使得计算机软件侵权行为发生的越来越普遍,侵权形式各式各样。软件侵权活动的猖獗首先损害了软件开发商的利益,进而打击了其不断创新软件技术的积极性,最终软件产业发展低迷,损害的还是整个社会的利益。因此,为了在法律上更好的保护计算机软件权益不受侵犯,如何认定计算机软件侵权行为便成为法律人士争相探讨的一个主要问题。 世界上大多数国家包括我国都是以著作权法来保护计算机软件作品的,著作权法一开始就是为保护文学、艺术等文字作品而制定的,但是计算机软件是最近几十年才逐渐发展起来的,,和传统作品有着很大的不同。因此本文首先从软件作品和侵权行为所具有的特殊性出发,探讨了软件著作权侵权行为认定的标准,最后笔者在已有理论的基础上提出了自己对侵权行为认定的一些看法。下面就简单介绍一下: 软件作品本身既有具有一般作品的性质,也具有很多不同于一般作品的特殊性质,这些决定了对软件作品的侵权行为在一定程度上不同于一般作品的侵权行为。软件作品在著作权上有很多权利受到保护,在实际发生的软件侵权案例中,涉及到最多的和侵权认定比较复杂的行为是对软件作品的复制和修改的行为,这也是本文主要研究的方面。我国在立法上并没有详细的规定软件著作权侵权行为的认定方法和具体步骤。笔者从普遍到具体、一般到特殊的角度,分析了认定软件著作权侵权行为时需要始终遵守的总原则和不同的具体标准,又针对软件侵权中存在的反向工程和最终用户侵权两个特殊问题进行了另外讨论。在著作权法上,思想与表达相区分原则被普遍适用于软件作品,当然软件作品也分为思想与表达,但是其表达的形式有文字部分和非文字部分两种,还有在文字部分上也与一般作品有很大的区别。软件作品的这些特别之处使得在适用“抽象概括法”和“实质性相似加接触”原则等不同的认定标准时,要考虑到具体实施细节方面的不同方面,以确保正确适用法律。这两种标准目的都是为了认定侵权行为,在认定过程中第一个步骤都是要先排除软件作品的思想,而“抽象概括法”可以更好的划分思想和表达,“实质性相似加接触”原则可以更好的具体对比两个软件中的表达,认定是否侵权。这两个标准不是独立的关系,具有一定的交叉关系,而且将它们综合运用可以取其所长,能够更好的认定侵权行为。在软件侵权中又有很多特殊问题需要特殊认定处理,以反向工程和最终用户侵权为例,不仅要考虑侵犯软件过程中的复制行为和行为的商业性质等因素,而且还要根据著作权法上的“思想与表达相区分原则”和“利益平衡原则”分析我国相关立法和如何认定此种情况下的侵权行为。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of high technology, especially the progress of computer software technology, the function of the software is becoming more and more, more and more than people's imagination, and the development of the Internet has changed the life of the modern society. Computer software represents the main characteristics of the information age, and in the aspect of life, it brings various new forms of entertainment and information communication to people, and constantly creates rich spiritual products; in the aspect of work, Its powerful information processing ability and paperless office change the way people work, and improve the working efficiency. Moreover, the computer software industry can create considerable economic benefits for society every year, and it plays a very important role in every industry in a country. This makes the infringement of computer software more and more widespread, and the forms of infringement are various. The rampant software infringement activity first damages the interests of the software developer, and further the enthusiasm of the software development technology, and finally the development of the software industry is weak, the damage is also the benefit of the whole society. Therefore, in order to protect the computer software's rights and interests without infringement in the law, how to determine the infringement of the computer software becomes a major problem that the law people are scrambling to explore. Most of the countries in the world include the copyright law to protect the computer software works, the beginning of the copyright law is to protect the works of literature, art and so on, but the computer software has developed gradually in recent decades There's a lot of difference between traditional and traditional works. In the same way, from the particularity of the software work and the tort, this paper discusses the standard of the software copyright infringement, and finally, on the basis of the existing theory, the author puts forward some views on the infringement. Act. Here's a simple introduction. The software work itself has the nature of the general works, and it also has a lot of special properties which are different from the general works, which determines the infringement of the software works to a certain extent different from the invasion of the general works The right behavior. The software works have a lot of rights in the copyright. In the case of the actual software infringement, the more complex behaviors involved in the infringement of the software are the behavior of the copying and modification of the software works, which is also the main research in this paper. In our country, there are no detailed methods and tools for the determination of the copyright infringement of the software in the legislation. The author analyses the general principle and the different specific standards which need to be always followed in the infringement of software copyright, and the two special problems of the reverse engineering and the end-user's infringement in the software infringement are also discussed. In the copyright law, the principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression is universally applicable to the software works. Of course, the software works are divided into the thought and the expression, but the expression form has both the character part and the non-text part, and the text part also has a great deal with the general work The difference between the software works makes it possible to take into account the different aspects of the specific implementation details in the application of different criteria such as the "abstract generalization method" and "substantial similarity and contact" principles to ensure proper fit In order to identify the infringement, the first step in the determination process is to first rule out the idea of the software work, and the "abstract generalization method" can better divide the thought and expression. The "substantial similarity and contact" principle can compare the expression of the two software more specifically, and the recognition is that No infringement. The two standards are not independent, have a certain cross-relation, and their comprehensive application can be taken as the director, and the invasion can be better recognized. The right behavior. There are many special problems in the software infringement. Special identification processing is required. In order to take the case of reverse engineering and end-user infringement as an example, it is not only to consider the commercial nature of the copying behavior and behavior during the software infringement Factors such as the "The principle of the distinction between the thought and the expression" and "principle of interest balance" of the copyright law should be analyzed to analyze the relevant legislation in China and how to determine the invasion in this situation
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 徐昱春;;计算机软件著作权侵权行为认定[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期

2 游闽键;最终用户侵权判决第一案的法律思考[J];电子知识产权;2003年02期

3 寿步;;创意不应受到版权保护[J];电子知识产权;2007年10期

4 孙海龙;姚建军;;知识产权民事审判中事实问题与法律问题辨析[J];电子知识产权;2007年11期

5 董峰君;;从“微软侵犯字体著作权案”看国产计算机软件知识产权的保护[J];法制与社会;2010年24期

6 田园;李帅;;知识产权侵权法保护方法评析[J];法制与社会;2011年07期

7 吕炳斌;计算机软件著作权保护和盗版问题研究[J];科技与法律;2002年03期

8 江波;张金平;;知识产权司法鉴定相关问题研究[J];科技与法律;2009年05期

9 张振亮,盛大铨;关于我国计算机软件法律保护的若干思考[J];南京邮电学院学报(社会科学版);2000年02期

10 李国泉;寿仲良;董文涛;;实质性相似加接触的侵权标准判断[J];人民司法;2010年16期



本文编号:2449330

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2449330.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户682ba***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com