博丹与普遍法的“国家”转向
发布时间：2019-04-13 15:00
【摘要】：本文以博丹的早期著作为中心,追踪欧洲近代早期罗马法研究传统的一次革命,它体现为一个以《民法大全》所象征的罗马和帝国大一统为中心的普遍法传统,向以主权国家为中心的普遍法研究传统的转变。《民法大全》的"成文理性"地位、它作为帝国法权的象征、以及罗马法学者围绕《民法大全》研究所结成的跨国界的法律人共同体意识共同维系着《民法大全》作为普遍法的地位。但这种普遍法地位最终随着人文主义方法的引入而遇到挑战,文字学的求真意识和"回到源头"的立场,瓦解了罗马法历史连续性的神话,由此引入的历史意识最终导向一种区别于罗马的民族意志,它在意大利体现为古典主义的共和立场,而在法国则体现为封建法研究的滥觞。通过对于两个学派研究方法和问题意识的扬弃,博丹试图建构一个兼具理性意识和历史经验的新普遍法体系,它通过逻辑分类保证科学性,通过万民法的填充保证普遍性。这样做的后果就是将帝国传统下的普遍法研究转化为一个以寻找法律内在精神和理性为要旨的法律科学,由于国家在这种法律科学中的中心地位,这种法理学最终又落实为一种公法科学和政治科学。
[Abstract]:This article, centered on Boden's early works, tracks a revolution in the study tradition of Roman law in the early modern European times. It is a universal legal tradition characterized by the unity of Rome and the Empire, symbolized by the General Book of Civil Law. The transformation to the traditional study of universal law centered on sovereign states. The "formative and cultural" status of the General Book of Civil Law, as a symbol of the legal power of the Empire, And Roman legal scholars together maintain the status of civil law as a universal law around the consciousness of cross-border legal person community formed by the Institute of General History of Civil Law. However, this universal legal status eventually met with the challenge with the introduction of humanism. The consciousness of seeking truth in philology and the stand of "returning to the source" disintegrated the myth of the historical continuity of Roman law. Thus, the historical consciousness finally leads to a kind of national will which is different from that of Rome, which is embodied in the republicist position of classicism in Italy and the origin of feudal law study in France. Through the sublation of the research methods and the problem consciousness of the two schools, Boden tries to construct a new universal law system with both rational consciousness and historical experience, which guarantees the scientificalness through logical classification and the universality by filling in the universal civil law. The consequence of doing so is to transform universal legal research under the imperial tradition into a legal science based on the search for the inner spirit and reason of the law, given the centrality of the State in this legal science, This jurisprudence is finally implemented as a public law science and political science.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所;
【分类号】：D904.1;D913
本文编号：2457678
[Abstract]:This article, centered on Boden's early works, tracks a revolution in the study tradition of Roman law in the early modern European times. It is a universal legal tradition characterized by the unity of Rome and the Empire, symbolized by the General Book of Civil Law. The transformation to the traditional study of universal law centered on sovereign states. The "formative and cultural" status of the General Book of Civil Law, as a symbol of the legal power of the Empire, And Roman legal scholars together maintain the status of civil law as a universal law around the consciousness of cross-border legal person community formed by the Institute of General History of Civil Law. However, this universal legal status eventually met with the challenge with the introduction of humanism. The consciousness of seeking truth in philology and the stand of "returning to the source" disintegrated the myth of the historical continuity of Roman law. Thus, the historical consciousness finally leads to a kind of national will which is different from that of Rome, which is embodied in the republicist position of classicism in Italy and the origin of feudal law study in France. Through the sublation of the research methods and the problem consciousness of the two schools, Boden tries to construct a new universal law system with both rational consciousness and historical experience, which guarantees the scientificalness through logical classification and the universality by filling in the universal civil law. The consequence of doing so is to transform universal legal research under the imperial tradition into a legal science based on the search for the inner spirit and reason of the law, given the centrality of the State in this legal science, This jurisprudence is finally implemented as a public law science and political science.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所;
【分类号】：D904.1;D913
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈颐;;博丹立法主权理论的论证及其意义[J];比较法研究;2010年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 柯联民;让·博丹政治、法律思想研究[D];上海师范大学;2011年
，本文编号：2457678
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2457678.html
