技术调查官制度之实务运作及精进措施——当事人诉讼程序保障之维度
发布时间：2019-05-19 13:13
【摘要】：我国技术调查官制度实务运作还存在许多争议问题,尚存在人数过少、程序地位不清、可能导致专利诉讼的主导权发生偏向、可能与当事人主义产生矛盾等不足。其理想的运作模式在于法官、技术调查官、当事人及诉讼代理人间的良好合作互动。其改革与精进需调整选任方式以扩大技术调查官来源、合理设置技术调查官的轮调年限、增加法庭上技术调查官人数、促进技术调查官与专利代理人的专业双向交流。客观制度上需给予技术调查官妥善的限制,避免其成为影子法官。基于诉讼当事人的程序权保障,应强制技术调查官对当事人发问,促进双方充分言词辩论,同时还应强制法官公开心证,避免突袭性裁判的发生。
[Abstract]:There are still many controversial problems in the practical operation of the technical investigators system in our country, there are still too few people and unclear procedural status, which may lead to the bias of the leading power of patent litigation, and may contradict the litigant doctrine and so on. Its ideal mode of operation lies in the good cooperation and interaction among judges, technical investigators, parties and litigants. The reform and refinement need to adjust the mode of selection and appointment in order to expand the source of technical investigators, reasonably set up the rotation life of technical investigators, increase the number of technical investigators in court, and promote the professional two-way communication between technical investigators and patent agents. In the objective system, technical investigators should be given proper restrictions to avoid becoming shadow judges. Based on the protection of the procedural rights of the litigants, the technical investigators should be forced to question the litigants and promote the full debate between the two sides. At the same time, the judges should be forced to disclose their evidence to avoid the occurrence of raging decisions.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“合作主义视野中城镇基层纠纷解决实证研究”(13XFX015) 2015年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“民事裁判中的司法控制与结果导向方法研究”(YKC201501083) 重庆市研究生科研创新项目“技术调查官制度的实务运作与再精进”(CYS16105)
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2480755
[Abstract]:There are still many controversial problems in the practical operation of the technical investigators system in our country, there are still too few people and unclear procedural status, which may lead to the bias of the leading power of patent litigation, and may contradict the litigant doctrine and so on. Its ideal mode of operation lies in the good cooperation and interaction among judges, technical investigators, parties and litigants. The reform and refinement need to adjust the mode of selection and appointment in order to expand the source of technical investigators, reasonably set up the rotation life of technical investigators, increase the number of technical investigators in court, and promote the professional two-way communication between technical investigators and patent agents. In the objective system, technical investigators should be given proper restrictions to avoid becoming shadow judges. Based on the protection of the procedural rights of the litigants, the technical investigators should be forced to question the litigants and promote the full debate between the two sides. At the same time, the judges should be forced to disclose their evidence to avoid the occurrence of raging decisions.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“合作主义视野中城镇基层纠纷解决实证研究”(13XFX015) 2015年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“民事裁判中的司法控制与结果导向方法研究”(YKC201501083) 重庆市研究生科研创新项目“技术调查官制度的实务运作与再精进”(CYS16105)
【分类号】：D923.4
【相似文献】
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前4条
1 黄琨;论我国知识产权审判中技术调查官制度的再造[D];河北经贸大学;2016年
2 贺伟;专利诉讼中技术调查官制度研究[D];湘潭大学;2016年
3 窦川;中国知识产权审判技术调查官制度研究[D];广东外语外贸大学;2016年
4 蒋竹婷;关于我国知识产权法院技术调查官制度思考[D];广东外语外贸大学;2016年
，本文编号：2480755
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2480755.html
