残障者法律保护问题及研究走向
发布时间：2019-05-23 17:39
【摘要】：我国的残障者立法从规范视角审视,存在立法语言明确性欠缺、逻辑矛盾、准确性不足问题,规范的逻辑构成上有假设条件和法律后果设计模糊等弊病;从主体视角审视,残障法律保护遭遇执法主体、责任主体、残障当事者不同情形的行动困境。故而,残障法律保护议题研究需要跨越单一的规范视角或行动视角,关注规范体系与既有生活世界如何有效互动。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of norms, there are some disadvantages in the legislation of the disabled in our country, such as the lack of clarity of legislative language, the contradiction of logic and the lack of accuracy, and the hypothetical conditions and vague design of legal consequences in the logical composition of norms. From the perspective of the subject, the legal protection of the disabled encounters the operational dilemma of the subject of law enforcement, the subject of responsibility and the party to the disability. Therefore, the research on the protection of disability law needs to cross a single normative perspective or action perspective, and pay attention to how to effectively interact between the normative system and the existing life world.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学人权教育与研究中心;
【基金】：西南政法大学人权教育与研究中心课题“国际法视野下的残疾人人权保障研究” 重庆市社会科学规划(培育)项目“儿童免于性侵法律保护研究”(2013PYFXll)
【分类号】：D922.1
[Abstract]:From the perspective of norms, there are some disadvantages in the legislation of the disabled in our country, such as the lack of clarity of legislative language, the contradiction of logic and the lack of accuracy, and the hypothetical conditions and vague design of legal consequences in the logical composition of norms. From the perspective of the subject, the legal protection of the disabled encounters the operational dilemma of the subject of law enforcement, the subject of responsibility and the party to the disability. Therefore, the research on the protection of disability law needs to cross a single normative perspective or action perspective, and pay attention to how to effectively interact between the normative system and the existing life world.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学人权教育与研究中心;
【基金】：西南政法大学人权教育与研究中心课题“国际法视野下的残疾人人权保障研究” 重庆市社会科学规划(培育)项目“儿童免于性侵法律保护研究”(2013PYFXll)
【分类号】：D922.1
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申惠文;;驳民法宪法新同位论[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年02期
2 何承斌;;试论人权的刑法保障的若干问题[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
3 郑德新;“法的起源”不等于“法意识的起源”——兼论关于“法的起源”争论的误区[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年01期
4 周方伦;刍议法官独立[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年02期
5 陈克军;;合同债权性质研究[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2008年03期
6 曹晓东;张清;;浅议侦查阶段的司法审查制度[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
7 郭莉;崔强;;乌江流域农业水权的法律保障制度研究[J];安徽农业科学;2010年01期
8 张，
本文编号：2484087
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2484087.html
