论夫妻共同财产单方处分行为的合同效力

发布时间：2019-06-10 01:43

【摘要】：婚姻关系存续期间对夫妻共有财产的处分,是夫妻关系的一项重要内容。且随着我国经济社会的快速发展,夫妻共同财产单方处分行为在社会实践生活中发生的概率尤为频繁,因此引起的法律纠纷也愈来愈多。在此类案件中,利益受损的夫妻另一方往往因该行为属于无权处分而向人民法院主张行为人因夫妻共同财产单方处分行为而与第三人订立的合同无效,并要求返还共有物。在具体处理这类案件过程中,因该类处分行为本身的复杂多样性,以及立法思想的变化和对法律规定的不同理解,导致理论界与司法实践界对该类问题的认知与实际处理上均出现不同的分歧与争议,如法律定性的不准确,效力认定上的不明晰,责任规范的不恰当以及适用法律上的随意性与模糊性等,导致实践审判过程中出现同案不同判的情况,严重影响司法的权威性及统一性。并进一步影响市场交易规则的不稳定性,影响社会市场经济秩序的正常运转。同时,《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第3条之规定,又与我国现行法律的规定存在让人不解之处,理应正视其存在的问题并寻求相应解决方法。本文运用比较分析与实证分析相结合的方法,从夫妻共同财产单方处分行为的案例着手,分析夫妻共同财产单方处分行为问题在国内外、理论界与实务界的不同观点与做法,反思该类问题对我国的借鉴意义。同时通过无权处分与善意取得、无权代理、表见代理、无因管理、权利瑕疵担保等相关法律制度之分析、比对,分析得出夫妻共同财产单方处分行为的法律性质为无权处分,并推导出因该无权处分行为与第三人订立的合同为效力待定的合同。同时,结合《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第3条之规定,分析该条规定对我国当前处理夫妻共同财产单方处分行为时存在的问题,通过规范该解释的解释主体、适用标的、适用范围、规范意志及与其他相关法律规则之间的界限,提出解决此类问题的意见、建议。
[Abstract]:The disposition of husband and wife's common property during the existence of marital relationship is an important part of marital relationship. With the rapid development of economy and society in our country, the probability of unilateral disposition of husband and wife's common property is particularly frequent in social practice, so there are more and more legal disputes. In such cases, the other party of the husband and wife whose interests are damaged often claims to the people's court that the contract concluded by the perpetrator with the third party because of the unilateral disposition of the joint property of the husband and wife is invalid because the act belongs to the unauthorized disposition, and demands the return of the common property. In the course of dealing specifically with such cases, due to the complex diversity of such disciplinary acts themselves, as well as changes in legislative thinking and different understandings of the provisions of the law, As a result, there are different differences and disputes in the cognition and actual treatment of this kind of problems between the theoretical circle and the judicial practice circles, such as the inaccurate nature of the law and the unclear identification of the effectiveness. The inappropriateness of liability norms and the arbitrariness and fuzziness of applicable law lead to the emergence of different judgments in the course of trial, which seriously affects the authority and unity of judicature. And further affect the instability of market trading rules, affect the normal operation of social market economy order. At the same time, the provisions of Article 3 of the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of disputes in Sale and purchase contracts are puzzling with the provisions of the current laws of our country. We should face up to its existing problems and seek corresponding solutions. This paper uses the method of comparative analysis and empirical analysis, starting from the case of unilateral disposition of joint property between husband and wife, analyzes the different viewpoints and practices of unilateral disposition behavior of common property of husband and wife at home and abroad, theoretical circle and practical circles. Reflect on the reference significance of this kind of problem to our country. At the same time, through the analysis and comparison of the relevant legal systems, such as unauthorized disposition and bona fide acquisition, no agency, apparent agency, no cause management, guarantee for defects of rights, and so on, it is concluded that the legal nature of unilateral disposition of joint property of husband and wife is unauthorized. The contract concluded with the third party because of the unauthorized disposition is the contract to be determined. At the same time, combined with the provisions of Article 3 of the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of disputes in the contract of Sale and purchase, this article analyzes the problems existing in dealing with the unilateral disposition of the joint property of husband and wife in our country at present. By standardizing the subject of interpretation, the subject matter of application, the scope of application, standardizing the will and the boundaries between the will and other relevant legal rules, this paper puts forward some suggestions and suggestions for solving this kind of problems.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】