商标性使用在侵权诉讼中的作用及其认定
发布时间：2019-06-11 05:38
【摘要】：商标性使用的制度价值在于划定商标法的调整范围以及商标权的权利边界。因此,在侵害商标权纠纷中,应将商标性使用作为侵权判断的前提,以确定被诉标志使用行为是否属于商标法调整,是否进入商标权的控制范围。这是区分商标性使用与标志使用的应然结果。商标性使用与描述性正当使用属于一般与特殊的关系,描述性正当使用属于非商标性使用,但并非所有的非商标性使用行为都属于描述性正当使用。商标性使用的认定属于相对客观的过程,在具体认定时应当避免将其与混淆可能性的判断相混淆,也不应将商品是否在国内销售作为考虑因素。
[Abstract]:The institutional value of trademark use lies in delineating the adjustment scope of trademark law and the right boundary of trademark right. Therefore, in the dispute of infringing trademark rights, trademark use should be regarded as the premise of infringement judgment in order to determine whether the use of trademark marks belongs to the adjustment of trademark law and whether it enters the control range of trademark rights. This is the result of distinguishing trademark use from logo use. Trademark use and descriptive legitimate use belong to the general and special relationship, descriptive legitimate use belongs to non-trademark use, but not all non-trademark use acts belong to descriptive legitimate use. The identification of trademark use belongs to a relatively objective process. In the specific identification, we should avoid confusing it with the judgment of confusion possibility, and should not consider whether the goods are sold at home or not.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(142DC020)“互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究”阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.43
本文编号：2497051
[Abstract]:The institutional value of trademark use lies in delineating the adjustment scope of trademark law and the right boundary of trademark right. Therefore, in the dispute of infringing trademark rights, trademark use should be regarded as the premise of infringement judgment in order to determine whether the use of trademark marks belongs to the adjustment of trademark law and whether it enters the control range of trademark rights. This is the result of distinguishing trademark use from logo use. Trademark use and descriptive legitimate use belong to the general and special relationship, descriptive legitimate use belongs to non-trademark use, but not all non-trademark use acts belong to descriptive legitimate use. The identification of trademark use belongs to a relatively objective process. In the specific identification, we should avoid confusing it with the judgment of confusion possibility, and should not consider whether the goods are sold at home or not.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(142DC020)“互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究”阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.43
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 石肖然;;论商标共存制度在中国的适用[J];社科纵横(新理论版);2012年04期
2 李鑫;;混淆原则下的商标侵权司法判定[J];法制与社会;2008年03期
3 张朋;;商标侵权标准“两立”的矛盾解析[J];知识产权;2013年10期
4 张莎莎;;对商标描述性使用构成要件的思考——评美国Micro Colors案[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年04期
5 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2497051
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2497051.html
