论格式条款的公平性审查

发布时间：2019-07-09 06:33

【摘要】：现代德国对格式条款不公平因素审查采取的是一般原则加“黑名单"和”灰名单"的分级规范方法,即首先对合同中的不公平因素进行一般规则的审查,然后根据不公平因素的严重程度不同将不公平条款区分为绝对无效与相对无效两类,如属于“黑名单”条款,法官会直接宣布其为不公平条款而无效;如属于“灰名单"条款,则法官还需结合相关情事具体判断该条款的不公平因素是否严重,最后再结合其是否符合诚信原则、是否符合合同目的、是否已尽合理提示义务等因素综合审查,以判断该格式条款是否为不公平条款。英美法系也基本采纳分级审查的方式。本文认为我国有必要在合同格式条款公平性审查方面采纳上述分级方法,而非目前绝对地无效而无任何区分的方式,以达到既可以促进交易,又可保障交易公平。
[Abstract]:Modern Germany adopts the general principle plus "blacklist" and "grey list" to review the unfair factors in the format clause, that is, to first review the unfair factors in the contract, and then to distinguish the unfair clauses into absolute invalidity and relative invalidity according to the gravity of the unfair factors, such as the "blacklist" clause. The judge will directly declare it null and void as an unfair clause; If it belongs to the "gray list" clause, the judge also needs to judge whether the unfair factors of the clause are serious or not, and finally combined with whether it conforms to the principle of good faith, whether it conforms to the purpose of the contract, whether it has done its reasonable obligation to prompt and so on, in order to judge whether the format clause is an unfair clause. The common law system also basically adopts the method of hierarchical review. This paper holds that it is necessary for our country to adopt the above classification method in the fairness review of contract format terms, rather than in the way of absolute invalidity and no distinction at present, so as to promote the transaction and guarantee the fairness of the transaction.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】