美国与欧盟社交媒体网络用户隐私法对比研究及其对中国的启示
发布时间：2021-10-05 10:26
在世界范围内社交平台的用户数据泄漏事件频发的背景下,本文通过对比美国及欧盟在网络隐私权法律法规及保护模式,对中国网络隐私权保护提出增强行业自律,及在立法和执法领域进行改革的建议。美国保护用户隐私以行业自律为主,一系列针对不同领域的法律法规为辅。无约束力的行业自律对数据驱动的企业发展影响较小,但并不能有效地保护用户数据隐私。不同领域的法律法规保护了特殊群体,例如未成年人,或对政府获取公民信息进行约束,但美国仍缺乏完善的网络隐私保护法。而相较之下欧盟侧重于采纳严格完善的法律法规约束企业。2018年出台的《通用数据保护条例》堪称史上最为严苛的用户隐私保护法,任何违反隐私保护要求的公司将面临高额罚款。此举较好地保护了用户数据安全。从中国多家互联网公司泄漏网络用户数据可看出,中国当前对于互联网用户的隐私保护仍然不够完善。《民法通则》仅规定自然人享有隐私权,并提出保护自然人的个人信息。《网络安全法》对数据收集者收集、利用用户个人信息及惩处措施作出详细规定,但完善的隐私法仍未建立,且缺乏数据保护机构监督。通过学习美国与欧盟经验,我国可通过加强行业自律、立法和执法改革以保护用户的网络隐私权。中国可建立...
【文章来源】：外交学院北京市
【文章页数】：67 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
Chapter1 The Right to Privacy and the Right to Online Privacy
1.1 The concept of the right to privacy
1.2 The concept of online privacy right
Chapter2 The Data Protection Approach of the United States
2.1 The tort approach of Facebook to users’privacy in the US
2.2 Industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.1 Introduction to industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.2 Main practice of industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.3 Comments on industry self-regulation
2.3 The legislative protection of privacy right in the US
2.3.1 Constitutional protection of privacy right in the US
2.3.2 Other privacy laws in the US
2.4 Summary of features of US protection approach
Chapter3 The Data Protection Approach of the European Union
3.1 The evolution of protection to privacy right in the EU
3.1.1 OECD Privacy Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Trans-borderFlow of Personal Data
3.1.2 Data Protection Directive
3.1.3 International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles
3.1.4 EU-US Privacy Shield and Swiss-US Privacy Shield Frameworks
3.2 General Data Protection Regulation
3.2.1 Drivers of enforcing GDPR
3.2.2 Key provisions of GDPR
3.2.3 The impact of the GDPR on data protection
3.3 Summary of features of EU’s protection approach
Chapter4 A Comparison Between US Protection Approaches and Those of the EU
4.1 Background of data protection in the US and the EU
4.2 Legal basis of data protection policies of the U.S. and the EU
4.3 A comparison of data protection approaches implemented by the US and EU
4.3.1 Different data protection approaches
4.3.2 Different restriction powers of the data protection authorities of the EUand the US over private organizations
4.3.3 Limited legal protection offered by the US laws
4.4 Potential results of data protection approaches of the US and the EU
4.4.1 Potential results of data protection approach of the US
4.4.2 Potential results of the data protection approach of the EU
Chapter5 Suggestions on the Protection of Privacy Right in China
5.1 The Status quo of privacy protection in China
5.2 Legal basis of privacy protection in China
5.3 Suggestions on the protection to privacy right
5.3.1 Strengthening industry self-regulation
5.3.2.Reform in both legislative and law enforcement branches
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix 1 Summary of protection approaches of theUS and the EU
Appendix 2 Summary of legal protection of China, theUS and the EU
本文编号：3419550
【文章来源】：外交学院北京市
【文章页数】：67 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
Chapter1 The Right to Privacy and the Right to Online Privacy
1.1 The concept of the right to privacy
1.2 The concept of online privacy right
Chapter2 The Data Protection Approach of the United States
2.1 The tort approach of Facebook to users’privacy in the US
2.2 Industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.1 Introduction to industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.2 Main practice of industry self-regulation in the US
2.2.3 Comments on industry self-regulation
2.3 The legislative protection of privacy right in the US
2.3.1 Constitutional protection of privacy right in the US
2.3.2 Other privacy laws in the US
2.4 Summary of features of US protection approach
Chapter3 The Data Protection Approach of the European Union
3.1 The evolution of protection to privacy right in the EU
3.1.1 OECD Privacy Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Trans-borderFlow of Personal Data
3.1.2 Data Protection Directive
3.1.3 International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles
3.1.4 EU-US Privacy Shield and Swiss-US Privacy Shield Frameworks
3.2 General Data Protection Regulation
3.2.1 Drivers of enforcing GDPR
3.2.2 Key provisions of GDPR
3.2.3 The impact of the GDPR on data protection
3.3 Summary of features of EU’s protection approach
Chapter4 A Comparison Between US Protection Approaches and Those of the EU
4.1 Background of data protection in the US and the EU
4.2 Legal basis of data protection policies of the U.S. and the EU
4.3 A comparison of data protection approaches implemented by the US and EU
4.3.1 Different data protection approaches
4.3.2 Different restriction powers of the data protection authorities of the EUand the US over private organizations
4.3.3 Limited legal protection offered by the US laws
4.4 Potential results of data protection approaches of the US and the EU
4.4.1 Potential results of data protection approach of the US
4.4.2 Potential results of the data protection approach of the EU
Chapter5 Suggestions on the Protection of Privacy Right in China
5.1 The Status quo of privacy protection in China
5.2 Legal basis of privacy protection in China
5.3 Suggestions on the protection to privacy right
5.3.1 Strengthening industry self-regulation
5.3.2.Reform in both legislative and law enforcement branches
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix 1 Summary of protection approaches of theUS and the EU
Appendix 2 Summary of legal protection of China, theUS and the EU
本文编号：3419550
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/3419550.html
