承运人无单放货的法律责任研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 18:37

本文选题：承运人　切入点：无单放货　出处：《大连海事大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：提单随着海上货物运输的发展而产生,在国际贸易中发挥了十分重要的作用。但是由于航海技术的进步和国际贸易的复杂化,实践中无单放货的现象与日俱增,极大地损害了提单制度和交易安全。本文从我国法律与《鹿特丹规则》中关于无单放货的规定出发,通过比较分析的方法,系统地对承运人无单放货的法律责任问题进行研究。其中承运人取广义概念,除狭义承运人之外,还包括协助其完成海上货物运输的其他人。本文除引言和结论之外,全文共分为五章。第一部分：承运人无单放货概述。对承运人无单放货的概念进行界定,分析承运人无单放货的类型、原因及影响,为下文的论述奠定基础。第二部分：承运人无单放货法律责任的性质。分别从我国司法实践和《鹿特丹规则》的角度对承运人无单放货法律责任的性质进行分析。第三部分：承运人无单放货法律责任的承担。将承运人具体分为狭义承运人、承运人的代理人、实际承运人三类主体,对我国法律与《鹿特丹规则》下承运人无单放货责任的承担进行比较分析。第四部分：承运人无单放货的赔偿范围及赔偿责任限制。结合我国法律与《鹿特丹规则》中的相关规定,研究承运人无单放货的赔偿范围,并对承运人无单放货时可否享受赔偿责任限制的权利进行分析。第五部分：承运人无单放货的免责情形。在特定情况下,承运人实施无单放货行为并不导致责任的承担,本部分将对我国法律与《鹿特丹规则》中规定的承运人无单放货的免责情形进行总结和比较。笔者希望通过本文的研究,明确我国在承运人无单放货法律责任方面的立法现状,并与《鹿特丹规则》中关于无单放货的新规定进行比较分析,以期对我国的无单放货立法和实践中无单放货纠纷的解决有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Bill of lading comes into being with the development of maritime cargo transportation and plays a very important role in international trade. However, due to the progress of navigation technology and the complication of international trade, the phenomenon of delivery of goods without bill of lading in practice is increasing day by day. The system of bill of lading and the security of transaction have been greatly damaged. Based on the provisions of the law of our country and the Rotterdam rules on the delivery of goods without bill of lading, the method of comparative analysis is adopted in this paper. This paper systematically studies the legal liability of the carrier for the delivery of goods without bill of lading, in which the carrier takes a broad concept, which, in addition to the narrow carrier, includes other persons who assist him in the carriage of goods by sea. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the full text is divided into five chapters. The first part is an overview of the carrier's delivery without bill of lading. It defines the concept of the carrier's delivery of goods without bill of lading, analyzes the types, causes and effects of the carrier's delivery of goods without bill, and lays a foundation for the following discussion. The second part: the nature of the carrier's legal liability for the delivery of goods without bill of lading. From the perspective of judicial practice in China and the Rotterdam rules, this paper analyzes the nature of the legal liability of the carrier for the delivery of goods without bill of lading. The third part: the legal liability of the carrier without bill of lading. The carrier is divided into three categories: narrow carrier, carrier's agent, actual carrier's three kinds of subjects. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the carrier's liability for delivery of goods without bill under the law of our country and the Rotterdam rules. Part 4th: the scope of compensation and limitation of liability for the carrier's delivery of goods without bill of lading. Combined with the relevant provisions of our law and the Rotterdam rules, this paper studies the scope of compensation of the carrier's delivery of goods without bill of lading. It also analyzes whether the carrier can enjoy the limitation of liability when he delivers the goods without bill of lading. Part 5th: exemption from delivery by the carrier without a bill of lading. In specific cases, the carrier does not incur liability by committing the act of delivery without a bill of lading, In this part, the author summarizes and compares the exemption of the carrier's delivery of goods without bill under the law of our country and the Rotterdam rules. Through the research of this paper, the author hopes to clarify the legislative status of the carrier's legal liability for delivery of goods without bill of lading in China, and make a comparative analysis with the new provisions of the Rotterdam rules on the delivery of goods without bill of lading. It is expected to be of benefit to the settlement of non-bill delivery dispute in our country's legislation and practice of non-bill delivery.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.19;D922.294

【相似文献】