论商事留置权的优先性
发布时间:2018-03-18 08:41
本文选题:民事留置权 切入点:商事留置权 出处:《宁波大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:商事交易的频繁,使得商人与商人之间的债权债务频生,而仅靠抵押权、质权等其它担保物权却无法解决商事交易中纷繁复杂的债权债务关系。商事留置权制度有着久远的历史亦成为解决商事交易困境的出路。可惜,无论是民法部门还是商法部门对商事留置制度都鲜有研究,只在《物权法》中有寥寥数笔、闪烁其词的规定。但是,从一个角度来看《物权法》的规定却为本文研究商事留置权提供了契机。本文追本溯源,从历史的角度出发,挖掘商事留置权的最初形态及其发展过程,并对现今该制度的适用所产生的问题做出思考,从而为建立完善的商事留置权制度提供参考性建议。 第一部分,从商事留置权的起源及其在国内外立法中规定入手。留置权制度最初的萌芽是随着工商业经济的发展,社会关系的复杂化而随之发展起来的,而各国各地区间的经济发展状况不同,从而以经济为基础而产生的各种上层社会制度也是不同的。因此留置权在各国各地区的发展适用是有区别的。故一方面留置权制度的重要性与实用性不言而喻,另一方面我国大陆的商事留置权应结合我国国情,因地制宜。 第二部分,从民事留置权享有优先效力的角度出发。阐述民事留置权享有优先性有充分的理论基础,而现阶段赋予商事留置权同民事留置权同样的优先性却缺乏理论依据。因此,本文在承认商事留置权具有优先性的基础上,力求以同一法律关系与牵连关系为切入口,为商事留置权的优先效力找寻理论依据,,同时为下文的论述做好铺垫。 第三部分,以第二部分为基础,在承接第二部分论证商事留置权享有优先性存在理论缺失的现实下,进一步论证因此而产生的种种权利冲突与法律风险,同时紧紧回扣文章主题:商事留置权制度存在缺陷,必须予以完善。并且为文章第四部分的制度完善打好基础。 第四部分,既然商事留置权制度在适用过程中可能产生诸多的问题,那么从理论上完善商事留置权制度是论文必须解决的任务。而商法是民法基础上具有相对独立性的特别法,商法本身具有一些特殊理论和概念,因此运用商法理念解决商事留置权问题是完善该项制度的出路。本部分从商法理念的角度出发,为商事留置权制度的完善提供参考性的见解。
[Abstract]:Because of the frequent commercial transactions, the creditor's rights and debts between the merchant and the businessman are often born, and only rely on the mortgage. However, other security interests, such as pledge, cannot solve the complicated relationship between creditor's rights and debts in commercial transactions. The commercial lien system has a long history and has become a way out to solve the dilemma of commercial transactions. Neither the civil law department nor the commercial law department has studied the commercial lien system. There are only a few evasive provisions in the Real Law. From a point of view, the provisions of Real right Law provide an opportunity for this article to study commercial lien. This paper traces its origin, from the historical point of view, excavates the initial form of commercial lien and its development process. The problems arising from the application of the present system are also considered, thus providing reference suggestions for the establishment of a perfect commercial lien system. The first part, starting with the origin of commercial lien and its provisions in domestic and foreign legislation, the initial germination of lien system developed with the development of industrial and commercial economy and the complication of social relations. And the economic development situation varies from country to region, Therefore, the development and application of lien in different countries and regions are different. Therefore, on the one hand, the importance and practicability of lien system is self-evident. On the other hand, the commercial lien in mainland China should be combined with the situation of our country. The second part, from the perspective of the priority effect of the civil lien, expounds that the priority of the civil lien has sufficient theoretical basis. However, there is no theoretical basis for giving commercial lien the same priority as civil lien at this stage. Therefore, based on the recognition that commercial lien has priority, this paper tries to take the same legal relationship and implicated relationship as the entry point. To find the theoretical basis for the priority effect of commercial lien, and to pave the way for the following discussion. The third part, on the basis of the second part, further demonstrates the conflicts of rights and legal risks arising from the lack of the theory of commercial lien priority. At the same time, it is necessary to perfect the system of commercial lien, and lay a good foundation for the perfection of the system of part 4th of the article. Part 4th, since the commercial lien system may have many problems in its application, Therefore, to improve the system of commercial lien theoretically is the task that the thesis must solve. While commercial law is a special law with relative independence on the basis of civil law, the commercial law itself has some special theories and concepts. Therefore, it is the way to perfect this system by using commercial law idea to solve the problem of commercial lien. This part provides reference for the perfection of commercial lien system from the angle of commercial law idea.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕来明;;论我国商事主体范围的界定[J];北方法学;2008年04期
2 康文义;;商事制度与法学方法论之完美融合——《德国商法》书评[J];研究生法学;2008年04期
3 陈敬根;;论《物权法》下海上承运人货物留置权的行使[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期
4 刘佳;;论我国留置权善意取得问题[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年S1期
5 兰桂杰;关于合同担保中留置权与抵押权的比较[J];法学杂志;2003年02期
6 梅夏英,方春晖;对留置权概念的立法比较及对其实质的思考[J];法学评论;2004年02期
7 曾大鹏;;商事留置权的法律构造[J];法学;2010年02期
8 洪鹏程;;物权法背景下对留置权的思考[J];法制与社会;2007年10期
9 刘水林;法学方法论研究[J];法学研究;2001年03期
10 邹海林;;留置权基本问题研究[J];法学研究;1991年02期
本文编号:1628865
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1628865.html