论经理对公司财产的诚信义务

发布时间：2018-03-20 15:37

  本文选题：经理概念　切入点：公司财产　出处：《中国政法大学》2006年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：现有学说及立法上往往侧重于对公司股东、董事诚信义务的规定,国内学者普遍认为,在义务上“经理与董事一样,对公司负有谨慎和忠实义务。我国原《公司法》第五十九条至六十二条关于董事义务的规定,同样适用经理。”因此,虽然《中华人民共和国公司法》(2005年10月27日修订通过,自2006年1月1日起施行,以下简称新《公司法》)中专章规定了“公司董事、监事、高级管理人员的资格和义务”,对公司经理等高级管理人员有了特别的规定,但是相对而言,论述董事义务的文章很多,而对经理不履行职责、诚信义务意识淡薄而导致对公司利益的侵害的研究并不是太多。 而现实生活当中,经理为了自己利益最大化,往往忽视公司利益,甚至以损害公司利益为手段来牟取一己私利。近些年来,各种媒体不断地报道在实践中经理层不遵守忠实和勤勉等诚信义务、对公司利益进行侵蚀的现象,诸如公司经理篡夺公司商业机会,与公司竞业十分严重,“跳槽”并策反公司主要职员,离职后侵犯公司商业秘密等等。在具体的司法实践中,因我国公司法和其他法律法规中对经理义务、责任的规定过于简单,很多义务、责任没有规定,而使这些行为无法进行规制、裁判,这种现象大有不断蔓延的势头。 本文研究的目的就在于通过对经理内涵外延的界定,强调对经理的诚信义务,从内部和外部加强对经理的约束和管制,试图架构民法中的帝王条款(民法典更多地负载安全理念,使所有者保持营业控制力,实现所有与控制的紧密结合)和商法中公司制度(商法典强调经理的自由决定权和经营判断力,从而使经营更专业、更有效率)的桥梁,以更好地保障公司财产的安全,维护社会秩序的稳定,也有利于社会信用体系的建立和完善。 本文采用比较法(大陆法系、英美法系比较;新旧《公司法》比较等等)、实证法(案例研究等)、归纳法、演绎法、经济学(引用数据等)等研究方法,对经理的概念、要素进行全方位的阐述,同时运用理论与实践相结合的方法、定性研究和定量研究相结合的方法等,从经理的诚信义务角度方面来谈对公司财产安全的保护问题,以及几方面对经理的约束和经理的责任追究机制,以期进行较为全面的研究和分析。
[Abstract]:The existing theory and legislation often focus on the provisions of the obligation of good faith to the shareholders and directors of the company. The domestic scholars generally believe that in the obligation, "the manager is the same as the director," The provisions of articles 59th to 62 of the former Company Law of China concerning the obligations of directors also apply to the manager. "therefore, although the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (revised and passed in October 27th 2005), Effective from January 1st 2006, the "qualifications and obligations of directors, supervisors and senior managers of a company" are stipulated in the special chapter of the New Company Law, which has special provisions for senior management personnel such as company managers, but relatively speaking, There are many articles on directors' obligations, but not too much research on managers' failure to perform their duties and weak sense of good faith obligations which lead to the infringement of the company's interests. In real life, managers, in order to maximize their own interests, often ignore the interests of the company, or even harm the interests of the company as a means to make a private profit. In recent years, Various media continue to report that in practice managers do not abide by their obligations of loyalty and diligence and erode the interests of the company, such as the usurpation of business opportunities by company managers. Competing with the company is very serious, "changing jobs" and opposing the main staff of the company, infringing on the company's business secrets after employment, etc. In the specific judicial practice, because of the obligations of the manager in the company law and other laws and regulations of our country, the regulation of responsibility is too simple. Many obligations, responsibilities are not stipulated, and make these acts can not be regulated, referees, this phenomenon is spreading momentum. The purpose of this paper is to define the connotation and extension of manager, emphasize the duty of good faith to manager, and strengthen the restriction and control of manager from inside and outside. Try to construct the imperial clause in the civil law (the Civil Code is more loaded with the concept of security, so that the owner to maintain business control, To achieve all the close integration with control and the corporate system in commercial law (the commercial code emphasizes the managers' free decision and business judgment, thus making their operations more professional and efficient), in order to better safeguard the safety of the company's property, Maintaining the stability of social order is also conducive to the establishment and improvement of social credit system. This paper uses comparative method (civil law system, Anglo-American law system comparison, comparison of old and new company law, etc.), empirical method (case study etc.), inductive method, deductive method, economics (citing data, etc.), to the concept of manager. At the same time, using the methods of combining theory with practice, qualitative research and quantitative research, the paper discusses the protection of company property safety from the perspective of manager's good faith obligation. And several aspects to the manager's restraint and the manager's responsibility investigation mechanism, in order to carry on the more comprehensive research and the analysis.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D922.291.91
，

本文编号：1639717