违法相对论下刑民实体冲突及其调适

发布时间：2018-03-29 18:50

  本文选题：民事合法　切入点：犯罪　出处：《政治与法律》2017年12期

【摘要】：利用"合法"民商事手段实施"犯罪"的案件在实践中屡屡出现,如何认定成为难题,这实际上涉及的是刑民实体冲突问题。刑民实体冲突是刑民交叉的下位概念,不同于刑民程序冲突,除了刑民(狭义)冲突还包括刑法和商法的冲突。同一客观事实,在刑事司法与民商事诉讼中可能得到完全不同的认定,这是刑民实体冲突产生的主要原因。此外,刑法与民法及商法在价值理念、技术特征、思维方式等方面的差异,也是冲突产生的原因。从刑法理论分析,对于民商法未禁止的行为能否认定为犯罪的回答,涉及"违法一元论"与"违法相对论"的争议,后者更适合我国刑事司法的理论与实践。在坚持"违法相对论"前提下,刑事实质可以刺破民商事表象。"刑破民"要大胆,"刑破商"要谨慎。
[Abstract]:The case of using "lawful" civil and commercial means to carry out "crime" often appears in practice. How to identify it becomes a difficult problem, which actually involves the problem of entity conflict between criminal and civilian, which is the lower concept of the intersection of criminal and civilian. Different from the conflict of criminal procedure, in addition to the conflict of criminal law (narrow sense), it also includes the conflict of criminal law and commercial law. The same objective fact may be completely different in criminal justice and civil and commercial proceedings. In addition, the differences between criminal law, civil law and commercial law in value concept, technical characteristics, mode of thinking and so on are also the causes of the conflict. The answer to whether an act not prohibited by the Civil and Commercial Law can be regarded as a crime involves the controversy between "illegal monism" and "illegal relativity", which is more suitable for the theory and practice of criminal justice in our country. Criminal essence can pierce the appearance of civil and commercial affairs.
【作者单位】： 同济大学法学院;
【基金】：2017年国家社科基金项目“信息化条件下特大城市犯罪治理研究”(项目编号:17BFX188)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923;D924.3
，

本文编号：1682388