国际船舶建造合同中建造方的救济研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 16:14

本文选题：船舶建造合同　切入点：法律性质　出处：《大连海事大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 如今,船舶工业已经成为我国的重要的产业,它对于促进劳动就业,发展出口贸易和保障海防安全意义重大。根据国防科工委制定的《船舶工业中长期发展规划》,要力争使我国到2015年使我国成为世界上最主要的造船大国和强国。根据国防科工委的统计,2007年我国新承接的船舶订单量已经超过7000万载重吨,超过韩国成为世界第一。然而,我国海商法理论界中对船舶建造的研究相对比较薄弱,在此背景下,笔者对船舶建造合同中船厂的救济问题进行研究。这也是笔者选题的主要原因和动力。在国际造船业中,应用最广泛的格式文本是由日本造船协会(The Shipbuilders'Association Of Japan)于1974年推出的标准格式,简称SAJ form。并且同海商法的其他领域一样,英国法在国际船舶建造合同的适用中占有主导地位。考虑到以上两点,笔者在本文的写作中,以SAJ格式为蓝本,结合国际造船业的实践,分析了英国法下船舶建造合同中船厂的法律地位和救济,并且对中国法下的船厂的法律地位和救济作了有益的探讨。在第一章,作者围绕船舶建造合同的法律性质展开,先介绍了英国法下船舶建造合同的性质,然后结合SAJ格式和造船实践,引用了大量的法学理论说明在中国法中,船舶建造合同应定性为买卖合同。第二章,笔者围绕国际船舶建造合同中的违约和救济展开论述,作者先介绍了英国法下,买卖合同中卖方的救济方式,明确在无明确约定的情况下卖方所享有的权和在国际造船合同中船厂所享有的救济。然后,重点论述了SAJ格式中船厂所享有的合同约定的救济方式。第三章,着重探讨了国际船舶建造合同中的风险负担和船厂的救济,首先明确了合同中风险负担的含义,然后结合造船实践,介绍了在船舶建造合同中风险的负担和船厂在风险负担下的救济。第四章,笔者探讨了SAJ格式中一个保护船厂利益的重要的条款——不可抗力条款,介绍了这个条款在英国法和中国法下的不同地位。
[Abstract]:Now, the shipbuilding industry has become China's important industry to promote employment, the development of export trade and the protection of coastal security is of great significance. According to the national science and Technology Committee to develop "ship industry long-term development plan", to strive to make our 2015 to make our country become the world's leading shipbuilding nation and power according to the statistics of COSTIND, ship orders in China in 2007 the new undertaking has more than 70 million deadweight tons, more than South Korea to become the first in the world. However, China's maritime law theory in the study of ship construction is relatively weak, in this context, the author makes a research on the relief of the shipbuilding contract in shipyard. This is the main reason of the author and the power.
In the international shipbuilding industry, the text format is the most widely used by the Japanese shipbuilding Association (The Shipbuilders'Association Of Japan) standard format launched in 1974, as well as other areas referred to as SAJ form. and with the maritime law, British law in international shipbuilding contracts applicable in a dominant position. Considering the above two points, the author in the the writing of this article, in the form of SAJ is modeled, combined with the practice of the international shipbuilding industry, analyzes the legal status of shipyard construction contract under English law and relief, and the Chinese law under the legal status of shipyard and beneficial relief work.
In the first chapter, the author carried out around the legal nature of shipbuilding contract, the first contract ship under English law construction is introduced, and then combined with the SAJ format and shipbuilding practice, citing a description of the legal theory in Chinese law, shipbuilding contract should be in the nature of contract. In the second chapter, I focus on the international shipbuilding breach of contract in the relief and discussion, the author first introduces the English law, the contract of sale the seller's Remedies, no clear agreement clearly in case the seller enjoys rights and in the international shipbuilding contract relief shipyard have. Then, discusses the shipyard in SAJ format as stipulated in the contract the way of relief. The third chapter focuses on the relief of risk burden in international shipbuilding contract and shipyard, first clear the burden of risk in the contract meaning, and then combined with the shipbuilding practice, introduction The burden of risk in shipbuilding contract and the relief of shipyard under the risk burden are discussed. In the fourth chapter, the author discusses an important clause in the SAJ format -- the force majeure clause, which introduces the clause's different status under the English law and the Chinese law.

【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D996.19

【引证文献】