关于喜马拉雅条款及其效力问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-09 05:32

本文选题：喜马拉雅条款　切入点：责任限制　出处：《大连海事大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文通过分析喜马拉雅条款的沿革变化过程,针对目前我国司法实践中出现的分歧和争议,研究提出符合我国国情以及国际发展趋势的立法建议。全文共分为五大部分。首先是喜马拉雅条款的概述。主要介绍喜马拉雅条款的起源、内容以及发展阶段。第二部分侧重介绍喜马拉雅条款的理论基础。喜马拉雅条款从产生之初就面临着理论障碍,该部分侧重介绍英美法系国家对这些理论障碍的突破以及由此概括总结的理论基础。第三部分介绍英美法系国家对喜马拉雅条款效力认定的一些经典判例、大陆法系国家对喜马拉雅条款的有关规定以及国际公约中涉及到喜马拉雅条款的相关规定。该部分主要旨在明晰国外航运发达国家以及国际公约对喜马拉雅条款及其效力的态度变化发展过程。第四部分通过对我国司法实践中出现的案例的分析,看到在我国司法实践中对喜马拉雅条款效力的认定存在着分歧和争议。文中对于类似港口经营人这样的主体能否受到喜马拉雅条款的保护进行了分析和说明,概括总结可以受到喜马拉雅条款保护的主体范围以及该条款所授予利益丧失的条件。本文的最后一部分,根据最新的《联合国全程或部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》中“海运履约人”这一概念的出现,结合我国的国情提出立法建议。本文研究的目的在于,通过立法建议的提出解决我国《海商法》中对喜马拉雅条款规定过于简单的问题,进而统一司法实践,明确类似港口经营人这类主体的法律地位和法律责任,促进航运业的发展。本文的创新点主要在文章的第四部分和第五部分。第四部分概括总结可以受到喜马拉雅条款保护的主体范围,以及该条款所授予利益丧失的条件。第五部分根据最新的国际公约提出立法建议。
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of the evolution process of the Himalayan clause and the differences and disputes in the judicial practice of our country, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions in accordance with the situation of our country and the trend of international development.The full text is divided into five parts.The first is an overview of the Himalayan clause.This paper mainly introduces the origin, content and development stage of Himalayan clause.The second part focuses on the theoretical basis of the Himalayan clause.The Himalayan clause has been confronted with theoretical obstacles from the beginning of its emergence. This part focuses on the breakthrough of these theoretical obstacles in common law countries and the theoretical basis summarized therefrom.The third part introduces some classical cases of the Himalayan clause validity in Anglo-American legal system countries, the relevant provisions of the Himalayan clauses in the continental law system countries and the relevant provisions of the international conventions concerning the Himalayan clauses.The main purpose of this part is to clarify the changing process of the attitude of the developed countries and international conventions to the Himalayan clauses and their effects.In the fourth part, through the analysis of the cases in the judicial practice of our country, we can see that there are differences and disputes about the validity of the Himalayan clause in the judicial practice of our country.This paper analyzes and explains whether a subject such as a port operator can be protected by the Himalayan clause, and summarizes the scope of the subject which can be protected by the Himalayan clause and the conditions for the loss of interest conferred by the clause.In the last part of this paper, according to the emergence of the concept of "maritime performing party" in the latest United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, some legislative suggestions are put forward according to the national conditions of our country.The purpose of this study is to solve the problem of the Himalayan clause in the Maritime Law of China by proposing legislative proposals, and then to unify the judicial practice.To clarify the legal status and legal responsibility of such subjects as port operators, and to promote the development of shipping industry.The innovation of this paper is mainly in the fourth and fifth parts of the article.The fourth part summarizes the scope of the subject which can be protected by the Himalayan clause and the conditions for the loss of benefits conferred by the clause.The fifth part puts forward legislative suggestions according to the latest international conventions.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】