公益救济的制度比较与反思

发布时间：2018-06-05 23:17

本文选题：公益诉讼制度 + 社会公共利益　；参考：《人民检察》2007年22期

【摘要】：近年来,国有资产流失、生态环境污染等严重侵害国家利益和社会公共利益的违法行为不断增多,然而,由于缺乏相应的救济措施,公共利益在受到侵害时常陷于无人救济或救济不能的尴尬境地。尽管刚刚修改的民事诉讼法并没有涉及此项内容,但是,理论界和实务领域对公益救济理论和机制建设的探讨一直十分热烈。就在本期杂志即将付印之际,有报道称,江西省检察院与省高级法院决定,对涉及公共利益的三类案件开展公益诉讼试点工作。10月26日至27日,由中国人民大学民商法研究中心、最高人民检察院检察理论研究所、河南省人民检察院联合主办的"2007·中原民事行政检察论坛"在河南省南阳市召开,会议围绕公共利益与公益诉讼、公益诉讼的制度安排等问题进行了深入探讨。本刊特组织"公益诉讼研究专题",选登部分文章,供读者参考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the loss of state-owned assets, ecological pollution and other serious violations of the interests of the state and the public interest of the law have been increasing. However, due to the lack of corresponding relief measures, The public interest is often trapped in the awkward position of no relief or no remedy when it is infringed. Although the revised Civil procedure Law does not deal with this content, the theoretical and practical field of public welfare relief theory and mechanism construction has been very heated. Just as this issue of the magazine is about to go to press, it is reported that the Jiangxi Provincial Procuratorate and the Provincial High Court have decided to pilot public interest litigation in three categories of cases involving the public interest. The "2007 Central Plains Civil and Administrative Procuratorial Forum", jointly sponsored by the Civil and Commercial Law Research Center of Renmin University of China, the Institute of prosecutorial Theory of the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Henan Provincial people's Procuratorate, was held in Nanyang City, Henan Province. Conference around public interest and public interest litigation, public interest litigation system arrangement and other issues were discussed. Our special organization "Public interest Litigation Research Special topic", selected some articles, for the reader's reference.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心
【分类号】：D926.32

【参考文献】