我国保险竞争法律问题研究
本文选题:我国 + 保险 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2004年硕士论文
【摘要】:伴随着竞争机制的不断引入,中国保险市场正经历高速发展的时期。但相对于西方发达国家而言,中国的保险市场结构仍处于难辨方向的摸索阶段。建立竞争性的保险市场体系,将继续是中国保险市场逐步走向成熟的关键。尤其是中国即将加入WTO和保险市场的进一步扩大开放,建立竞争性的保险市场体系将有利于提高保险市场的运作效率,优化保险市场的市场结构,促进保险市场的良性发展。而要实现这一目标,必须有良好且有效的法律环境作保障。作为社会主义法治经济的一部分,保险市场的成长状况关系着社会生活的方方面面,因为,保险的本质就是由社会来分担个别人或个别群体的损失,来减小各种灾祸给个人带来的不利影响。可以说,保险的各方主体虽然是特定的人或群体,但其影响却波及整个社会。对于这样一个社会影响极其广泛的行业,其行为活动必然要受到法律的约束,因为只有法律才能从根本上排除人治,排除少数人的恣意妄为,从而保证社会利益在最大程度上得以实现。 全文共分为三个部分: 第一部分——我国保险市场上的不正当竞争行为 首先,针对目前理论界和实践界对保险竞争行为性质的误解,笔者着意辨析了垄断与不正当竞争的区别,并明确保险市场上的不规范竞争行为属于不正当竞争,而非垄断行为。其次,列举了我国保险市场上不正当竞争行为的表现与危害。其表现主要有:强制保险行为、违规经营行为、限制竞争行为、人才争抢行为等;其危害主要有:扰乱市场的秩序,给保险行业带来混乱,以及引起业务质量下降,使保险公司形成巨额赔付压力而无可靠的赔付能力等。再次,分析了我国保险市场上不正当竞争行为的成因,如保险市场培育不充分,导致经营方式粗放;外部竞争条件不平等,诱使竞争行为不正当;不正当竞争行为的违法成本偏低, WP=50 守法成本偏高;保险行业从业人员素质偏低;保险业竞争立法相对滞后;执法不公等。 最后,基于以上论述,得出以法规制我国保险市场上不正当竞争行为的必要性,即它是保险市场自身发展的客观需要,是中国保险市场向国际化趋势发展的有力保障。 第二部分——我国保险竞争法律体系的理论基础 保险竞争是竞争的一种,因此,要想正确地理解保险竞争,我们就有必要从基础的竞争理论着手,逐渐推演开来,从竞争的共性中寻找出保险竞争的特性。同时,我们还要以竞争法制度为基础,寻找保险竞争法的基本立足点。 对于竞争的含义,笔者从经济学上的竞争入手,引导出法学意义上的竞争,即市场经济主体在生产经营活动中,以追求最大经济效益为目的,通过合法手段所进行的有关市场条件、市场资源、市场份额和市场活动结果的有序争夺。对于竞争的功能,可从积极与消极两方面分析,其积极的功能主要有:可以促进社会生产力的合理流动,实现资源的优化配置;可以调节国民收入的分配和再分配,有利于合理的市场价格的确定和均衡利润的形成;可以作为经济发展的动力和压力,优胜劣汰,促进社会经济的繁荣与进步;可以最大限度的实现对消费者合法权益的保护等。其消极功能主要有:竞争的充分开展通常要付出一定的社会成本;会破坏既存的社会经济秩序;对社会精神文明建设有一定负面影响;不可避免的会导致各种形式的垄断的出现等。 所谓竞争法,是调整市场公平竞争关系和市场竞争管理关系的法律规范的总和。竞争法的调整对象有反不正当竞争关系、公平竞争关系和国家对市场竞争的管理关系。竞争法的法律体系是指竞争法所应当涵盖的子法规群,即确认、创设竞争条件和竞争环境的法律规范、调整市场竞争关系的实体性法律规范、调整竞争管理关系的实体法规范,以及处理竞争关系的程序法规范。竞争法的性质也具有复合性,是兼具有私法 WP=51 (商法)和公法或社会法(经济法)双重属性的混合法律制度。同时,竞争法对社会经济发展具有多方面的积极作用。 第三部分——建立我国保险竞争法律体系的制度设想 首先,建立我国保险竞争法律体系具有重要意义,,它有利于保证保险人具有足够的偿付能力,维护被保险人的合法权益;有利于维护保险业的公平竞争;有利于防止保险欺诈的发生;有利于保险业经营的合理化和科学化;并有利于提高保险业的社会效益。 其次,保险竞争立法的主要目的是促进和保护公平有序的保险竞争活动。在我国的保险行业,公平竞争仍应具有这样一种涵义:它不强调结果相等,而重视起点,重视程序,强调每个“人”(个人和企业)都有参与竞争的机会,要求竞争各方面临同样的选择机会,即机会均等的公平。 最后,笔者以为,对我国保险竞争立法可以提出以下几点建议:1、进行税制改革,确保不同主体的平等竞争地位;2、拓宽保险资金运用途径,加速保险基金积累,提高保险偿付能力;3、严格区分政策性保险与商业性保险,使商业保险更贴近市场;4、规范保险条款,使之更趋严谨科学;5、严格资格管理,提高保险从业人员素质;6、建立保险监管机制,强化保险监管;7、切实落实法律规定,加大对严重违法违规行为的惩罚力度;8、加大对保险及保险法规的宣传力度,提高国民的保险意识。 综上,通过对我国保险市场上竞争行为的分析,笔者试图阐明我国保险市场
[Abstract]:With the continuous introduction of competition mechanism, China's insurance market is experiencing a period of rapid development. However, relative to western developed countries, China's insurance market structure is still in the difficult stage of exploration. To establish a competitive insurance market system will continue to be the key to the gradual maturity of China's Insurance Market. Especially China's insurance market. The further expansion of the WTO and the insurance market and the establishment of a competitive insurance market system will help to improve the efficiency of the insurance market, optimize the market structure of the insurance market and promote the healthy development of the insurance market. To achieve this goal, a good and effective legal environment must be guaranteed. As part of the rule of law economy, the growth of the insurance market is related to all aspects of social life, because the essence of the insurance is to share the loss of other people or individual groups by the society to reduce the adverse effects of various calamities on individuals. The activities of the whole society. For such an industry with extremely wide social impact, its activities are bound to be bound by the law, because only the law can fundamentally eliminate the rule of man and exclude the unscrupulous of a few, so that the social interests can be realized to the greatest extent.
The full text is divided into three parts:
The first part is unfair competition in China's insurance market.
First, in view of the misunderstanding of the nature of insurance competition in the theoretical and practical circles, the author distinguishes the difference between monopoly and unfair competition, and makes clear that the unfair competition behavior in the insurance market belongs to unfair competition, not monopoly. Secondly, it lists the performance and harm of unfair competition behavior in the insurance market of our country. The main manifestations are: compulsory insurance, illegal operation, restriction of competitive behavior, and talent competition. The main hazards are: disrupting the order of the market, bringing chaos to the insurance industry, causing the decline of the business quality, causing the insurance companies to form a huge compensation pressure and no reliable compensation ability. The causes of unfair competition in the risk market, such as inadequate cultivation of the insurance market, lead to extensive operation, unequal external competition conditions, unjustifiable competition behavior, low cost of illegal competition, and low cost of illegal competition.
WP=50
The cost of obeying the law is high, the quality of the employees in the insurance industry is low, the legislation of the insurance industry is lagging behind, and the law enforcement is unfair.
Finally, based on the above discussion, it is necessary to regulate the unfair competition behavior in the insurance market of our country, that is, it is the objective need of the development of the insurance market itself, and it is the strong guarantee for the development of the Chinese insurance market to the trend of internationalization.
The second part -- the theoretical foundation of China's insurance competition legal system
Insurance competition is a kind of competition. Therefore, if we want to understand the insurance competition correctly, it is necessary for us to start from the basic competition theory and gradually deduce the characteristics of the insurance competition from the commonality of the competition. At the same time, we should look for the basic foothold of the insurance competition law on the basis of the competition law system.
For the meaning of competition, the author, starting with the competition in economics, guides the competition in the sense of law, that is, the orderly contention of market conditions, market resources, market share and the result of market activities through legal means in the pursuit of the maximum economic benefit in the production and operation of the market economy. The function can be analyzed from two aspects of positive and negative aspects. The main functions are as follows: it can promote the rational flow of social productivity, realize the optimal allocation of resources, adjust the distribution and redistribution of national income, be beneficial to the determination of reasonable market prices and the balance of the formation of Lei, and can be used as the motive force of economic development and Pressure, the survival of the fittest, the promotion of social and economic prosperity and progress, and the maximum realization of the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. Its negative functions are as follows: the full development of competition usually pays a certain social cost; it will destroy the existing social and economic order; it has a negative impact on the construction of social spiritual civilization. Inevitably, it will lead to the emergence of various forms of monopoly.
The so-called competition law is the sum of the legal norms regulating the relationship between the market fair competition and the management of the market competition. The object of the adjustment of the competition law is the anti unfair competition relationship, the fair competition relationship and the management relation of the state to the market competition. The legal system of the Competition Law refers to the sub laws and regulations that the competition law should cover, that is to say, to establish and create the competition law. The legal norms of competition conditions and competitive environment, substantive legal norms regulating market competition relations, regulating the substantive law of competition management relations, and procedural norms dealing with competitive relations. The nature of competition law is also complex and has private law.
WP=51
(Commercial Law) and public law or social law (Economic Law) dual attributes of the mixed legal system. At the same time, competition law has many positive effects on social and economic development.
The third part -- the assumption of establishing the legal system of insurance competition in China
First, it is of great significance to establish the legal system of insurance competition in our country. It is beneficial to ensure that the insurer has sufficient solvency, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the insured, protect the fair competition of the insurance industry, prevent the occurrence of insurance fraud, be beneficial to the rationalization and scientific management of the insurance industry, and be beneficial to the insurance industry. To improve the social benefits of the insurance industry.
Secondly, the main purpose of insurance competition legislation is to promote and protect fair and orderly insurance competition activities. In China's insurance industry, fair competition should still have such a meaning: it does not emphasize the equality of the results, and attaches importance to the starting point, attaches importance to the procedure, and emphasizes that every "person" and "enterprise" have the opportunity to participate in the competition, and the competition is required. The same choice is equal opportunity equality.
Finally, the author thinks that the following suggestions can be put forward to China's insurance competition legislation: 1, carry out tax reform to ensure the equal competitive position of different subjects; 2, broaden the use of insurance funds, accelerate the accumulation of insurance funds, improve the solvency of insurance; and 3, strictly divide the policy insurance and commercial insurance to make commercial insurance more affixed. Near the market; 4, standardize the insurance clause, make it more rigorous and scientific; 5, strict qualification management, improve the quality of insurance employees; 6, establish insurance regulatory mechanism, strengthen insurance supervision; 7, implement the legal provisions, increase the punishment of serious illegal and illegal behavior; 8, increase the publicity of insurance and insurance regulations, and raise the country The consciousness of the people's insurance.
In conclusion, by analyzing the competitive behavior in China's insurance market, the author tries to clarify the insurance market in China.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2004
【分类号】:D922.284
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁松;论美国保险业的竞争和监管及其对我国的启示[J];中共杭州市委党校学报;2004年01期
2 安娜;我国保险市场现状分析[J];长江论坛;1999年03期
3 冯煜,刘新立;台湾保险市场的开放及对大陆的启示[J];两岸关系;2003年10期
4 李佐霜;俄罗斯与中国保险市场对比研究[J];东北亚论坛;2003年06期
5 邓成明;阳建勋;;美国保险市场竞争规制的立法及个案分析[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2005年09期
6 刘助仁;中国保险市场研究述要[J];理论前沿;1995年17期
7 郝演苏;在相同的国际经济环境下走向开放[J];两岸关系;2002年01期
8 ;保险市场六大问题[J];兵团党校学报;2001年04期
9 赵红星;“复关”对我国保险市场的影响及其对策[J];新长征;1994年06期
10 刘玮;试论保险市场的法律监管体系[J];保险研究;1998年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 薛善蒙;;论人员跳槽和竞业避止[A];“落实科学发展观,又快又好发展山东保险业”论文评选[C];2006年
2 王懿璇;余贵芳;刘君;;我国保险市场的现状与发展策略[A];黑龙江省保险行业协会二届理事会换届大会暨三届理事会一次会议文集[C];2004年
3 吴黎军;胡锡健;刘永强;;主成分和因子分析在保险市场分析中的应用——乌鲁木齐保险市场影响困素分析[A];2003中国现场统计研究会第十一届学术年会论文集(上)[C];2003年
4 ;保险市场重在引导[A];2004年全国保险行业协会秘书长联席会议论文集[C];2004年
5 黄国石;;保险市场中的逆向选择分析[A];2001中国控制与决策学术年会论文集[C];2001年
6 黄国石;;道德风险与逆向选择分析[A];2002中国控制与决策学术年会论文集[C];2002年
7 魏勇;;建立内河船舶强制责任保险制度的思考[A];2006年度海事管理学术交流会优秀论文集[C];2006年
8 魏勇;;建立内河船舶强制责任保险制度的思考[A];中国航海学会2006年度学术交流会优秀论文集[C];2007年
9 ;面对风险 迎接未来——著名精算专家钟煦和先生来杭州访问、讲学[A];浙江省保险学会第六次会员代表大会论文集[C];2008年
10 曹明川;;对上海保险市场持续发展的点滴思考[A];2004年上海市保险学会年会论文集——暨上海市保险学会成立20周年和《上海保险》创刊20周年纪念[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 楼兴望;保险竞争的理念[N];上海金融报;2002年
2 庹国柱;保险竞争 百姓最受益[N];大众科技报;2001年
3 陆刃波 盛桢智;消费者是中外资保险竞争的导火索?[N];中国保险报;2002年
4 南开大学国际保险研究所 邵全权;发达国家保险竞争与监管的经验[N];中国保险报;2008年
5 黄晓琴;保险竞争进入服务比拼时代[N];证券日报;2004年
6 齐瑞宗 朱俊生;并购:提升保险竞争力的新途径[N];中国保险报;2002年
7 原文;保险竞争:产品与服务[N];金融时报;2001年
8 本报记者 艾俊川;保险竞争遭遇人才短缺[N];金融时报;2002年
9 记者 吴红军;保险竞争进入客户导向时代[N];金融时报;2005年
10 记者 尹代文;保险竞争要的是公平[N];上海金融报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 程振源;保险市场若干非对称信息问题的博弈分析[D];厦门大学;2003年
2 辛强;欧洲保险市场的一体化:政策、效果与启示[D];复旦大学;2003年
3 周志刚;风险可保性理论与巨灾风险的国家管理[D];复旦大学;2005年
4 简育宗;世界贸易组织(WTO)——服务业贸易总协定(GATS)下两岸保险市场研究[D];中国政法大学;2000年
5 周延;中国保险市场结构、行为与绩效研究[D];山东大学;2007年
6 毕姝晨;中国保险业适度管制模式研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
7 赵利胜;金融开放条件下我国保险安全问题研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
8 罗之仁;我国民族保险教育研究[D];中央民族大学;2006年
9 曾立新;巨灾风险融资机制与政府干预研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
10 汤文巍;上海市老年长期护理保险(LTCI)研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨光;我国保险竞争法律问题研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 聂小丽;我国保险市场理论与实证分析[D];华中科技大学;2004年
3 陈璐;中国保险市场对外开放策略研究[D];天津财经学院;2000年
4 蒋雪辉;我国保险市场的开放与政府监管[D];西南财经大学;2000年
5 蒋新伟;我国保险市场结构、行为、绩效的实证研究[D];西南财经大学;2002年
6 袁沁;我国保险市场信息不对称问题研究——一种信息经济学角度的分析[D];湖南大学;2003年
7 章昀;从保险市场发育水平看考核体系的确立[D];南京理工大学;2004年
8 董雁翔;论我国保险市场的适度开放[D];东北农业大学;2000年
9 程晓艳;中资保险公司核心竞争力研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
10 毛伟;中国保险市场利益主体行为分析[D];武汉理工大学;2005年
本文编号:1987420
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1987420.html