论经济法视野下的经营者
发布时间:2018-07-03 15:59
本文选题:经营者 + 经济法视野 ; 参考:《中国政法大学》2009年硕士论文
【摘要】: 经营者为经济法的重要主体,在经济法学界已基本达成共识。但是,有关经营者的内涵与外延,却尚未定论。学界主要集中在《反不正当竞争法》和《消费者权益保护法》中对其进行研究。其对经营者的界定最常见的表述方式就是:“以营利为目的从事商事生产、销售和商业性服务的法人、其他组织和个人。”笔者认为该概念过于强调经营者的营利目的,却忽略了经营者作为经济法主体所应承担的经济法意义上的责任。特别是将经营者定义的落脚点定位于“法人、其他组织和个人”,用这种方式来阐释经营者的外延无法突出经营者作为经济法主体的特性,也不利于同民商法上的“自然人、法人和其他组织”相区分。本文试图从经济法的视野出发,来研究和界定经营者的内涵与外延,以期能够解决现存的问题,完善经济法主体理论并指导司法实践。 本文分引言、正文、结论三个部分。 引言部分,笔者首先就本文的选题原因和目的进行了说明,接着简要阐述了国内外关于经营者的研究现状和发展趋势,从而指出该选题研究的意义,并对本文的创新之处和主要观点进行了说明。 正文部分主要从四个部分进行论述。 第一部分阐述经营者研究的现状和现存的问题。通过该部分的论述,可以明确该选题研究的原因和意义,并且通过对所存在的问题的阐述,为后文的研究和论述奠定基础。 第二部分阐述法律主体与经济法主体理论。该部分是本文进行研究的理论支撑。通过对法律主体的阐释,以及对不同部门法视野下的主体理论进行比较研究,明晰了经济法主体与民商法主体的区别,明确了经济法视野下的主体所应具有的特点。 第三部分阐述经营者的内涵。这是在上述两个部分的基础之上,通过分析、比较目前现有的对经营者的界定,指出目前对经营者界定的不足。并通过现行法上对经营者的界定以及理论上对经营者的界定两个方面的具体分析,最终在经济法的视野下界定出经营者的内涵。 第四部分界定经营者的外延。该部分是在第三部分定义经营者内涵的基础上进行的。在此基础上,将经营者的外延界定为企业、从事经营活动和营利性服务的组织、以及非营利性的社会团体机构等,并着重从目前实践中较为典型或存在较大争议的几个主体进行分析。以期对经营者进行准确的界定。 结论部分。重申本文的主要观点。
[Abstract]:As an important subject of economic law, the operator has reached a consensus in the field of economic law. However, the connotation and extension of the operator has not yet been concluded. Scholars mainly focus on the anti-unfair competition law and consumer rights and interests protection law. The most common way to define the operator is: "legal persons, other organizations and individuals engaged in commercial production, sales and commercial services for the purpose of profit." The author thinks that the concept emphasizes too much on the profit purpose of the operator, but neglects the responsibility of the operator as the subject of economic law in the sense of economic law. In particular, the definition of operator should be positioned at the "legal person, other organizations and individuals". In this way, the extension of the operator cannot highlight the characteristics of the operator as the subject of economic law, nor is it conducive to the "natural person" in the same civil and commercial law. Legal persons and other organizations "are distinguished". This paper attempts to study and define the connotation and extension of the operator from the perspective of economic law in order to solve the existing problems perfect the theory of the subject of economic law and guide the judicial practice. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the foreword part, the author explains the reason and purpose of the topic, and then briefly expounds the research status and development trend of the operator at home and abroad, and points out the significance of the research. And the innovation of this article and the main points of view were explained. The main body part is discussed from four parts. The first part describes the current situation and existing problems of operator research. Through the discussion of this part, we can make clear the reason and significance of the research, and through the exposition of the existing problems, we can lay the foundation for the later research and discussion. The second part expounds the theory of the subject of law and the subject of economic law. This part is the theoretical support of this study. Through the interpretation of the subject of law and the comparative study of the theory of the subject under the field of view of different branches of law, the difference between the subject of economic law and the subject of civil and commercial law is clarified, and the characteristics of the subject under the vision of economic law are clarified. The third part expounds the connotation of the operator. This is on the basis of the above two parts, through the analysis, compares the existing definition of the operator, points out the deficiency of the current definition of the operator. Through the concrete analysis of the definition of the operator in the current law and the definition of the operator in theory, the connotation of the operator is finally defined in the view of the economic law. The fourth part defines the extension of the operator. This part is based on the definition of operator in the third part. On this basis, the extension of operators is defined as enterprises, organizations engaged in business activities and for-profit services, as well as non-profit social organizations, etc. And focus on the current practice from the more typical or controversial several subjects to analyze. With a view to an accurate definition of the operator. Conclusion. Reiterate the main points of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李友根;论经济法主体[J];当代法学;2004年01期
2 刘水林;试析民法与经济法的基本假设差异[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年03期
3 王全兴,管斌;民商法与经济法关系论纲[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年05期
4 蒋悟真;;传承与超越:经济法主体理论研究——以若干经济法律为视角[J];法商研究;2007年04期
5 吕忠梅;论经济法的边缘[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年04期
6 何文龙;经济法理念简论[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1998年03期
7 徐孟洲;论中国经济法的客观基础和人文理念[J];法学杂志;2004年04期
8 邱本;论经济法主体[J];法学评论;1997年03期
9 刘运新;陈乃新;;经济法主体论纲[J];贵州警官职业学院学报(公安法治研究);2006年06期
10 李友根;;论经济法视野中的经营者——基于不正当竞争案判例的整理与研究[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2007年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 薛克鹏;经济法定义研究[D];西南政法大学;2002年
,本文编号:2094181
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2094181.html