论我国动产抵押公示的缺陷及其完善

发布时间：2018-08-03 14:58

【摘要】： 我国1995年的《担保法》顺应经济发展的需要,规定了动产抵押制度。《担保法》对动产抵押公示方式的规定和世界其他国家一样,借用了不动产物权的公示方式。利用登记对动产抵押进行公示。但由于动产抵押登记缺乏表现于外部的表面特征,动产抵押制度便与相关法律制度产生了激烈冲突。《担保法解释》和《物权法草案》都对此进行了一定的完善,但都没有解决动产抵押的公示缺陷问题。随着经济的发展,动产抵押的融资功能越来越大,但是动产抵押的公示缺陷却一直阻碍着动产抵押制度发挥其应有的功能。本文立足于我国的现实国情,结合我国《担保法》、《担保法解释》、《海商法》、《民用航空器法》以及《物权法草案》,以历史法学和比较法学为研究方法,分析了我国动产抵押公示方式的现有规定,指出我国动产抵押公示的缺陷是抵押登记缺乏表现于外部的表面特征;在分析了国内外解决动产抵押公示难题的各种具体作法及学者建议的基础上,提出了适合我国国情的解决动产抵押公示难题的办法。本文除前言、结论外,共分三章。第一章我国动产抵押公示方式的现状及其缺陷。我国《担保法》区分不同的动产对动产抵押分别采取登记成立主义和书面成立——登记对抗主义的立法方式。《物权法草案》对此进行了一定的修改,把动产抵押公示方式统一为书面成立——登记对抗主义。但是《担保法》、《物权法草案》都没有采取措施,弥补动产抵押公示方式的缺陷。在动产抵押公示的效力上,没有明确规定善意第三人的范围。《担保法解释》、《物权法草案》都赋予了动产抵押登记
[Abstract]:Our country's 1995 "guarantee Law" conforms to the need of economic development and prescribes the system of chattel mortgage. Like other countries in the world, it borrows the public form of real property right of real estate. Use registration to publicize the chattel mortgage. However, due to the lack of external features in the registration of chattel mortgage, the chattel mortgage system has had a fierce conflict with the relevant legal system. Both the interpretation of the guarantee Law and the draft of the Real right Law have made certain improvements to this issue. However, none of them has solved the problem of imperfection of publication of chattel mortgage. With the development of economy, the financing function of chattel mortgage is more and more great, but the imperfection of public notice of chattel mortgage has been hindering the chattel mortgage system to play its proper function. This paper is based on the reality of our country, combined with our country's "Guaranty Law", "Guaranty Law interpretation", "Maritime Law", "Civil aircraft Law" and "draft of property Law", taking historical law and comparative law as research methods. This paper analyzes the existing regulations on the publicity of chattel mortgage in our country, and points out that the defects of the publicity of chattel mortgage in our country are the superficial features of the lack of mortgage registration. Based on the analysis of various concrete methods and suggestions made by scholars at home and abroad to solve the problem of publication of movable property mortgage, this paper puts forward some methods to solve the problem of publicity of chattel mortgage publicity suitable for the situation of our country. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is about the present situation and defects of the publicity mode of chattel mortgage in our country. The Law of Guaranty of our country distinguishes different kinds of chattel mortgage from chattel mortgage by adopting the legislative methods of registration establishment doctrine and written establishment-registration antagonism respectively. The draft of the Real right Law has made certain amendments to this. Unifying the publicity mode of chattel mortgage as written establishment-registration antagonism. However, neither the Law of Guaranty nor the draft of Real right Law has taken any measures to remedy the defects of the way of publication of chattel mortgage. There is no clear definition of the scope of bona fide third party in the publicity of chattel mortgage.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】