股权担保行为研究
[Abstract]:Guarantee refers to the guarantee of debt, which can be understood from two perspectives: from the point of view of creditor's rights, it is to ensure the smooth realization of creditor's rights, from the point of view of debt, it is to urge the debtor to fulfill his obligations voluntarily. He wrote: "The land in Attica is covered with pillars of collateral that say how much the land has been mortgaged to somebody. 1" He also pointed out that "land can now be sold and mortgaged. The mortgage system was invented as soon as the ownership of the land was established. From the beginning, guarantees were linked to the commodity economy, private ownership, commodity trade and monetary economy. The earliest guarantees were stipulated in the Roman law, the first universal law in the society of commodity producers. The Roman law established many ways of guaranteeing the performance of guaranteed obligations, such as liquidated damages. Money, bond, mortgage, and pledge. The legal principles of modern creditor's rights guarantees developed largely from the principles of Roman law.
Like the emergence of a large number of financial derivatives, with the rapid development of modern credit economy, a variety of new forms of secured creditor's rights are realized in more and more ways. From the perspective of traditional legal system, these new forms of secured creditor's rights can not be put into an appropriate position, and the laws of various countries regulate the scope of security. It can be said that the guarantee law is the most complex subject in the civil law system.
With the emergence of equity economy, equity has become a kind of "property" in the security system which can be used to set up, protect and benefit significantly. Generally speaking, the meaning of equity should include shareholder's rights, capital and stock. Equity has the nature of amount, responsibility, transfer and securities. These characteristics provide the possibility for the concrete operation and implementation of the securities that equity can provide. However, as we all know, the emergence of the security system is much earlier than the emergence of equity. Therefore, the corresponding provisions of various countries for equity guarantee are still in a stage of constant practice and exploration.
As one of the subjects of civil and commercial law, this paper studies the combination of equity and guarantee in different countries. In Continental France, equity guarantee is basically limited to the application of pledge of rights. However, in Anglo-American countries, the security of equity is the same as their guarantee system, and there are many different types. Understanding of the academic status of the subject of equity guarantee, we know that the study of equity guarantee by Chinese scholars is limited to the pledge of equity in continental law, but it is still a blank space for the content of Anglo-American law, but in fact, the application of equity in Anglo-American national security system is closely related to modern economic needs. The combination of the two further consolidates and promotes the tradition and development of relevant legal systems, such as trust system and e-commerce. It is precisely because of this academic significance that this paper takes the pledge of rights in continental law as the main line, and combines the relevant legislation and practice of Anglo-American law, through the relevant cases and articles. The study of the law, the division of the nature of the equity guarantee, the discussion of the eligible equity, the legal effect of the equity guarantee, the realization of the equity guarantee, the present situation of the equity guarantee in our country and the legislative issues are elaborated in detail and put forward my own views. Financing laws will be a good summary and induction in the study and research of civil and commercial law.
At present, when the Property Law of China is coming out, I think that the study of the real right of security of stock right will make me understand the law and play an important role in the application of law in practice.
【学位授予单位】:对外经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2002
【分类号】:D912.28
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 晓静;;穿上西装搞改革[J];晚晴;2011年07期
2 宋晓明;周帆;沙玲;;《关于审理期货纠纷案件若干问题的规定(二)》的理解与适用[J];人民司法;2011年03期
3 ;曹氏传承[J];中国企业家;2011年13期
4 张驰;观为国;;三旗衰落[J];法人;2011年08期
5 欧阳军;;情人联手创业存隐患 明争暗斗换来一地血腥[J];法庭内外;2011年07期
6 周宏根;;小电工制造的诈骗大案[J];法学天地;2000年04期
7 宣炀;;一字之差引纠纷——定金与订金[J];女性天地;2011年08期
8 ;图说法律[J];法律与生活;2011年18期
9 ;河南省省级行政事业单位国有资产对外有偿使用管理暂行办法[J];行政事业资产与财务;2011年03期
10 乔雄兵;王邦武;;《中间人持有证券实体法公约》介评——兼论公约对我国的启示[J];武汉金融;2011年09期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王占洲;林苇;;关于贷款诈骗罪的几个问题[A];第三届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2001年
2 王占洲;林苇;;关于贷款诈骗罪的几个问题[A];贵州法学论坛第三届文集[C];2001年
3 仲琦;韩泽生;;我国中小企业信用担保体系的发展与局限浅析[A];冶金自动化信息网年会论文集[C];2004年
4 江乾坤;冯飞;;多元化战略、财务困境与利益输送——以~*ST海星卖壳格力地产为例[A];中国会计学会第八届全国会计信息化年会论文集[C];2009年
5 谢伟;刘杨林;;延长保留所有权之法律比较[A];首届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2000年
6 范国平;;论让与担保制度[A];第四届中国律师论坛百篇优秀论文集[C];2004年
7 刘忠东;;过滤式除尘器的运行保证[A];中国硅酸盐学会环保学术年会论文集[C];2004年
8 吴云燕;高峰;;高新技术企业融资担保及其价值研究[A];中国高等院校市场学研究会2011年年会论文集[C];2011年
9 陈冬梅;;银保联手,支持中小企业发展[A];2004年上海市保险学会年会论文集——暨上海市保险学会成立20周年和《上海保险》创刊20周年纪念[C];2004年
10 陈浩;沈红;;国家助学贷款中银行利益的保障方式-是风险补偿还是担保?[A];2004年中国教育经济学学术年会论文——“学生贷款的偿还、持续发展与高等教育入学”研究成果集(一)[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 蒋冬英 邵宝华;同是担保为何责任不同[N];江苏经济报;2004年
2 刘宏明;我国债权担保方式概述[N];中国绿色时报;2003年
3 ;担保中的定金[N];河北科技报;2004年
4 记者红 敏;华润锦华 提交担保异议[N];证券日报;2003年
5 本报记者 刘 川;巨额担保压扁南方建材[N];证券日报;2005年
6 本报记者 杨代金;违规担保不可为![N];财会信报;2005年
7 天津 文良;担保也要讲“资格”[N];中国证券报;2005年
8 本报记者 马立群;“新太科技”深陷担保泥潭[N];经济日报;2005年
9 律师 汪来超 娄红阳;被迫担保能免责吗?[N];经理日报;2005年
10 王璐;占款与担保 黑洞犹在[N];上海证券报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 徐洁;担保物权功能论[D];西南政法大学;2004年
2 张域;担保法律制度与习俗的文化解读[D];吉林大学;2007年
3 钟青;权利质权研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
4 杨卉青;宋代契约法律制度研究[D];河北大学;2008年
5 蒋先玲;项目融资模式及法律问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2002年
6 李燕;独立担保法律制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2004年
7 朱凡;人的担保基本制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2004年
8 伍军;国有商业银行债权保护问题研究[D];西南财经大学;2006年
9 齐亚莉;中国金融生态问题研究[D];西南财经大学;2006年
10 高圣平;动产担保交易制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭筱琦;股权担保行为研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2002年
2 朱涛;项目融资中的担保法律研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2002年
3 费志强;中小企业动产质押担保研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2004年
4 韩小杰;备用信用证法律研究[D];苏州大学;2003年
5 覃华平;论国际贸易中银行见索即付担保的相关法律问题[D];中国政法大学;2003年
6 刘江华;项目融资风险问题研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
7 翟小明;我国中小企业信用担保现状分析及对策[D];西南财经大学;2001年
8 王茜;上市公司关联担保的公司法规制[D];湖南大学;2004年
9 靳瑞芹;我国浮动抵押制度的立法完善研究[D];内蒙古大学;2008年
10 梁卫洪;地方人大还贷承诺的法律问题研究[D];暨南大学;2005年
本文编号:2186706
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2186706.html