船舶经营人的识别及相关法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-28 06:50
【摘要】： 船舶经营人的识别问题是海事司法实践中迫切需要解决的重要问题之一。虽然船舶经营人的概念早已在有关国际公约和我国《海商法》中出现，但对于其具体含义却众说纷纭。由于船舶经营人有权享受海事赔偿责任限制，因此实践中许多主体在需要承担责任时经常以自己是船舶经营人来主张责任限制，这不仅不利于保护第三人的合法权益，从长远来看也不利于海事赔偿责任限制制度的存在和发展。因此，十分有必要在理论上明确船舶经营人所应具有的法律特征，为识别船舶经营人提供一个比较合理可行的标准。 由于实践中对“船舶经营人”这一称谓的使用比较混乱，使得对船舶经营人的研究不能从实践当中业已存在的各种“船舶经营人”的表现形式入手，而必须从法律创设船舶经营人这一概念的本来意图去把握它应当具有的法律特征。通过对《1967年统一船舶优先权和抵押权公约》和《1976年海事赔偿责任限制公约》对船舶经营人相关规定的分析，笔者认为船舶经营人在本质上应当是“能够合法地占有或控制船舶”的一类主体。根据这一特征，笔者归纳出船舶经营人识别所应遵循的几个标准，据此对实践当中可能存在的船舶经营人进行了甄别，，并将船舶经营人与其他类似船舶经营人的主体加以比较，以求印证船舶经营人识别标准的合理性和可行性。在此基础上，文章对船舶经营人的法律责任、登记、保险等相关问题都作了尝试性探讨，以求对完善我国与船舶经营人有关的法律规定有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The identification of ship operators is one of the most important problems in maritime judicial practice. Although the concept of ship operator has already appeared in the relevant international conventions and China's Maritime Law, there are different opinions on its specific meaning. Because the ship operator has the right to enjoy the limitation of liability for maritime claims, in practice, many subjects often claim the limitation of liability as they are the ship operators, which is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the third party. In the long run, it is not conducive to the existence and development of the limitation system of maritime claims liability. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the legal characteristics of ship operators in theory, and to provide a reasonable and feasible standard for the identification of ship operators. Because of the confusion in the use of the term "ship operator" in practice, the study of ship operator cannot begin with the existing forms of expression of "ship operator" in practice. It is necessary to grasp the legal characteristics of ship operator from the original intention of creating the concept of ship operator by law. Through the analysis of the relevant provisions of the 1967 Convention for the Unification of Maritime liens and mortgages and the 1976 Convention on limitation of liability for Maritime claims, The author thinks that the ship operator should be a kind of subject which can legally occupy or control the ship in essence. According to this characteristic, the author sums up several standards that should be followed in the identification of ship operators, and then discriminates the possible ship operators in practice, and compares the ship operators with the main bodies of other similar ship operators. In order to verify the rationality and feasibility of ship operator identification standards. On this basis, the article makes a tentative discussion on the legal liability, registration, insurance and other related issues of the ship operator, in order to improve the legal provisions related to the ship operator in China.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D996.19
本文编号：2208612
[Abstract]:The identification of ship operators is one of the most important problems in maritime judicial practice. Although the concept of ship operator has already appeared in the relevant international conventions and China's Maritime Law, there are different opinions on its specific meaning. Because the ship operator has the right to enjoy the limitation of liability for maritime claims, in practice, many subjects often claim the limitation of liability as they are the ship operators, which is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the third party. In the long run, it is not conducive to the existence and development of the limitation system of maritime claims liability. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the legal characteristics of ship operators in theory, and to provide a reasonable and feasible standard for the identification of ship operators. Because of the confusion in the use of the term "ship operator" in practice, the study of ship operator cannot begin with the existing forms of expression of "ship operator" in practice. It is necessary to grasp the legal characteristics of ship operator from the original intention of creating the concept of ship operator by law. Through the analysis of the relevant provisions of the 1967 Convention for the Unification of Maritime liens and mortgages and the 1976 Convention on limitation of liability for Maritime claims, The author thinks that the ship operator should be a kind of subject which can legally occupy or control the ship in essence. According to this characteristic, the author sums up several standards that should be followed in the identification of ship operators, and then discriminates the possible ship operators in practice, and compares the ship operators with the main bodies of other similar ship operators. In order to verify the rationality and feasibility of ship operator identification standards. On this basis, the article makes a tentative discussion on the legal liability, registration, insurance and other related issues of the ship operator, in order to improve the legal provisions related to the ship operator in China.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D996.19
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张运鑫;;论海商法中船舶经营人的概念[J];珠江水运;2008年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 李晓茜;船舶触碰损害赔偿归责原则及责任主体研究[D];大连海事大学;2011年
2 曾露玲;船舶管理人的法律责任和保险问题研究[D];上海海事大学;2005年
3 耿新颖;船舶经营人的识别及其法律地位[D];大连海事大学;2006年
4 梁谷晨;沉船沉物打捞清除制度分析及责任主体的确定[D];上海海事大学;2007年
5 朱芹;远东—西非线散杂货半班轮船舶经营公司租船之船型决策[D];上海海事大学;2007年
6 王克文;海事赔偿责任限制责任主体研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年
7 新薇;定期租船合同下出租人的责任承担研究[D];大连海事大学;2009年
8 赵帅;残骸强制清除打捞费用实现的法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2010年
9 魏轲;BIMCO船舶管理协议标准文本研究[D];大连海事大学;2012年
本文编号：2208612
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2208612.html
