FOB卖方对承运人诉权制度研究
发布时间：2018-10-31 15:55
【摘要】：FOB贸易属于是我国对外贸易中常用的贸易方式,由于FOB术语的特殊性,FOB卖方处于较特殊的地位,在国际贸易实践中对FOB卖方的保护处于混乱和不完善状态。由于我国是出口大国,在国际贸易中常常扮演FOB卖方的角色,所以我们有必要理清思路,完善对FOB卖方的保护,也更好的在国际贸易中保护我国出口方的利益。对FOB卖方的保护可以有很多方式,由于对FOB卖方的诉权没有统一的认识,也没有形成系统的保护机制,故本文对FOB卖方的诉权问题进行了分析和整理,希冀FOB卖方诉权问题变得清晰和容易操作,在海商法修改的大背景下,提出自己对FOB卖方诉权问题的构建建议。 本文一共分为四章,主要针对实务中FOB卖方的不利地位,通过对比和理论探讨分析了其行使诉权的具体情况和建议,具体如下： 本文第一章简单介绍了民事诉讼中诉权的涵义、简单的发展状况,我国对FOB卖方诉权的理论和实践现状、通过分析得出应赋予FOB卖方诉权的结论。分析了FOB卖方诉权存在的合理性和正当性。 第二、三章是文章的主体部分,是作者对FOB卖方诉权机制构建的设想和分析,希冀能理顺FOB卖方诉权问题的思路,更好地保证FOB卖方行使诉权,主要探讨了FOB卖方在不同角色时其诉权问题。第二章探讨了FOB卖方是法定托运人时的诉权；第三章探讨了卖方是提单持有人时的诉权。这一部分主要内容是探讨FOB卖方如何行使诉权以保护自己在贸易中处于的不利地位,并对其具体行使的诉权性质有所分析。 文章的最后一章是针对我国对FOB卖方诉权问题的现状,提出了对此问题的立法建议。这只是笔者的粗浅看法,殷切希望能得到学术界专业人士指正。
[Abstract]:FOB trade is a common trade mode in foreign trade of our country. Because of the particularity of FOB term, FOB seller is in a special position, and the protection of FOB seller is in confusion and imperfection in international trade practice. As China is a big exporter and often plays the role of FOB seller in international trade, it is necessary for us to clarify our thinking, perfect the protection of FOB seller, and better protect the interests of our export party in international trade. There are many ways to protect the FOB seller. Since there is no unified understanding of the FOB seller's right of action and no systematic protection mechanism, this paper analyzes and arranges the problem of the FOB seller's right of action. It is hoped that the issue of FOB seller's right of action will become clear and easy to operate. Under the background of the modification of maritime law, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the construction of FOB seller's right of action. This article is divided into four chapters, mainly aimed at the disadvantage of FOB seller in practice, through comparison and theoretical analysis of the specific situation and suggestions for the exercise of the right of action. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter briefly introduces the meaning of the right of action in civil action, the simple development, the theory and practice of the FOB seller's right of action in our country, and draws the conclusion that the seller's right of action should be given to the FOB through the analysis. This paper analyzes the rationality and legitimacy of the existence of FOB seller's right of action. Second, the third chapter is the main part of the article, which is the author's assumption and analysis of the construction of FOB seller's right of action mechanism, hoping to straighten out the ideas of FOB seller's right of action, and better ensure the FOB seller to exercise the right of action. This paper mainly discusses the litigation rights of FOB sellers in different roles. The second chapter discusses the right of action when the FOB seller is the legal shipper, and the third chapter discusses the right of action when the seller is the holder of the bill of lading. The main content of this part is to discuss how the FOB seller exercises the right of action in order to protect his disadvantageous position in the trade, and analyzes the nature of the specific right of action exercised by the seller. In the last chapter, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on the problem of FOB seller's right of action. This is only the author's superficial view, eager to get academic professionals pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2302772
[Abstract]:FOB trade is a common trade mode in foreign trade of our country. Because of the particularity of FOB term, FOB seller is in a special position, and the protection of FOB seller is in confusion and imperfection in international trade practice. As China is a big exporter and often plays the role of FOB seller in international trade, it is necessary for us to clarify our thinking, perfect the protection of FOB seller, and better protect the interests of our export party in international trade. There are many ways to protect the FOB seller. Since there is no unified understanding of the FOB seller's right of action and no systematic protection mechanism, this paper analyzes and arranges the problem of the FOB seller's right of action. It is hoped that the issue of FOB seller's right of action will become clear and easy to operate. Under the background of the modification of maritime law, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the construction of FOB seller's right of action. This article is divided into four chapters, mainly aimed at the disadvantage of FOB seller in practice, through comparison and theoretical analysis of the specific situation and suggestions for the exercise of the right of action. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter briefly introduces the meaning of the right of action in civil action, the simple development, the theory and practice of the FOB seller's right of action in our country, and draws the conclusion that the seller's right of action should be given to the FOB through the analysis. This paper analyzes the rationality and legitimacy of the existence of FOB seller's right of action. Second, the third chapter is the main part of the article, which is the author's assumption and analysis of the construction of FOB seller's right of action mechanism, hoping to straighten out the ideas of FOB seller's right of action, and better ensure the FOB seller to exercise the right of action. This paper mainly discusses the litigation rights of FOB sellers in different roles. The second chapter discusses the right of action when the FOB seller is the legal shipper, and the third chapter discusses the right of action when the seller is the holder of the bill of lading. The main content of this part is to discuss how the FOB seller exercises the right of action in order to protect his disadvantageous position in the trade, and analyzes the nature of the specific right of action exercised by the seller. In the last chapter, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on the problem of FOB seller's right of action. This is only the author's superficial view, eager to get academic professionals pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 庞艳卿;FOB合同项下卖方权利探讨[J];重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
2 江波;;FOB术语下出口合同的风险与防范[J];当代经济;2008年12期
3 谷浩;FOB术语下的卖方对承运人索赔问题探析[J];对外经贸实务;2000年09期
4 林瑞云;提单托运人诉权探讨[J];对外经贸实务;2003年04期
5 李晶;违约对货物风险转移的影响——UCC与CISG相关条款对比分析[J];对外经贸实务;2003年05期
6 马得懿;;FOB条件下卖方风险问题研究——以托运人制度为视角[J];法商研究;2008年04期
7 王丽;赵伟丽;;FOB条件下托运人的认定[J];法制与社会;2008年30期
8 袁晓娜;出口商慎重使用FOB出口[J];国际市场;2002年08期
9 楚风华;;FOB价格条件下托运人的认定[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年04期
10 祁长生;;FOB贸易术语下卖方如何规避风险[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2006年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 张丽敏;国际海上货物运输合同下的诉权问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2004年
2 何川;国际海上货物运输合同项下诉权问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2005年
3 孙永刚;论FOB术语下卖方在海上货物运输中的法律地位[D];上海海事大学;2006年
4 黄建峰;国际海上货物运输法律关系下货方诉权制度比较研究[D];中国海洋大学;2008年
，本文编号：2302772
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2302772.html
