海事赔偿责任限制程序与破产程序关系研究
发布时间：2018-12-10 06:37
【摘要】：海上航行的风险较大,货损或者船货俱损的情形时有发生。当发生重大海上事故造成损害时,船舶所有人等责任主体可以向海事法院申请设立海事赔偿责任限制基金。在启动海事赔偿责任限制程序之前或之后,因责任人无法清偿到期债务,就会有该责任主体本身或者其债权人向人民法院申请破产,两类法律关系分别由海事法律和破产法规定,对于交叉内容的规定却是空白,由此海事赔偿责任限制程序与破产程序就可能产生冲突。此时,如何协调法院的审判程序、如何妥善处理海事债权和岸上债权,解决各类债权在受偿顺序上的矛盾等等就成为亟需解决的问题。如何解决上述冲突,是一个海商法与破产法、海商法与物权法、实体法与程序法相交叉的未决课题,虽然在实践中较少遇到,但终将成为困扰海事理论界与实务界的一大难题。本文分为以下四部分： 本文第一章和第二章将简要概述海事赔偿责任限制程序与破产程序。 第三章将阐述海事赔偿责任限制程序与破产程序冲突的具体表现,包括海事赔偿责任限制程序在破产程序启动后的存续问题、海事债权和破产债权审查确认的问题、海事赔偿责任限制基金与破产财产之间的关系等等问题。 第四章将在分析冲突原因的基础上提出解决海事赔偿责任限制与破产程序冲突的建议,并对整体立法手段和具体问题之解决都进行详细的研究和梳理。 第五章将整体研究跨国海事赔偿责任限制程序与破产程序的冲突,描述已经存在的管辖问题与法律适用问题并提出解决问题的思路。 本文将详细研究两程序之间存在的冲突以及两个程序中涉及的不同权利之间的冲突,通过运用法律基本原则来解决冲突所产生的问题,并对于我国海事赔偿责任限制程序的完善提出意见和建议。该研究对于如何完善我国的海事赔偿责任限制程序制度和海事司法审判实践具有非常重要的意义。
[Abstract]:The risk of navigation at sea is high, and damage or damage to cargo and cargo occur from time to time. When damage is caused by a major maritime accident, the owner of the ship and other responsible parties may apply to the maritime court for the establishment of a limitation fund for maritime claims liability. Before or after the commencement of the procedure for limiting liability for maritime claims, because the person responsible is unable to pay off the debts due, the subject of the liability or its creditors will apply to the people's court for bankruptcy, The two kinds of legal relations are stipulated by maritime law and bankruptcy law respectively, but the provisions of cross-content are blank, so the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability and bankruptcy procedure may produce conflict. At this time, how to coordinate the court's trial procedure, how to properly deal with maritime claims and shore claims, and how to solve the contradictions of various claims in the order of compensation has become an urgent problem to be solved. How to solve the above conflicts is an outstanding subject that maritime law and bankruptcy law, maritime law and property law, substantive law and procedural law are intersected. Although they are seldom encountered in practice, they will eventually become a major problem puzzling maritime theorists and practitioners. This paper is divided into four parts: the first and second chapters briefly summarize the limitation procedure and bankruptcy procedure of maritime claims liability. The third chapter will expound the concrete manifestation of the conflict between the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability and the bankruptcy procedure, including the existence of the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability after the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, the problems of the examination and confirmation of the maritime creditor's right and the bankruptcy claim, The relationship between the limitation of liability for maritime claims and bankruptcy property and so on. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions to solve the conflict between the limitation of liability for maritime claims and the bankruptcy procedure on the basis of analyzing the causes of the conflict, and make a detailed study and combing of the overall legislative means and the solution of specific problems. The fifth chapter will study the conflict between the limitation procedure of transnational maritime claim liability and the bankruptcy procedure, describe the existing jurisdiction problem and law application problem, and put forward the way to solve the problem. This paper will study in detail the conflicts between the two procedures and the conflicts between the different rights involved in the two procedures, and solve the problems arising from the conflicts by applying the basic principles of law. And put forward the opinion and suggestion on the perfection of the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability in our country. This study is of great significance to improve the limitation procedure system of maritime claims liability and the practice of maritime judicial trial in China.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2370133
[Abstract]:The risk of navigation at sea is high, and damage or damage to cargo and cargo occur from time to time. When damage is caused by a major maritime accident, the owner of the ship and other responsible parties may apply to the maritime court for the establishment of a limitation fund for maritime claims liability. Before or after the commencement of the procedure for limiting liability for maritime claims, because the person responsible is unable to pay off the debts due, the subject of the liability or its creditors will apply to the people's court for bankruptcy, The two kinds of legal relations are stipulated by maritime law and bankruptcy law respectively, but the provisions of cross-content are blank, so the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability and bankruptcy procedure may produce conflict. At this time, how to coordinate the court's trial procedure, how to properly deal with maritime claims and shore claims, and how to solve the contradictions of various claims in the order of compensation has become an urgent problem to be solved. How to solve the above conflicts is an outstanding subject that maritime law and bankruptcy law, maritime law and property law, substantive law and procedural law are intersected. Although they are seldom encountered in practice, they will eventually become a major problem puzzling maritime theorists and practitioners. This paper is divided into four parts: the first and second chapters briefly summarize the limitation procedure and bankruptcy procedure of maritime claims liability. The third chapter will expound the concrete manifestation of the conflict between the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability and the bankruptcy procedure, including the existence of the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability after the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, the problems of the examination and confirmation of the maritime creditor's right and the bankruptcy claim, The relationship between the limitation of liability for maritime claims and bankruptcy property and so on. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions to solve the conflict between the limitation of liability for maritime claims and the bankruptcy procedure on the basis of analyzing the causes of the conflict, and make a detailed study and combing of the overall legislative means and the solution of specific problems. The fifth chapter will study the conflict between the limitation procedure of transnational maritime claim liability and the bankruptcy procedure, describe the existing jurisdiction problem and law application problem, and put forward the way to solve the problem. This paper will study in detail the conflicts between the two procedures and the conflicts between the different rights involved in the two procedures, and solve the problems arising from the conflicts by applying the basic principles of law. And put forward the opinion and suggestion on the perfection of the limitation procedure of maritime claim liability in our country. This study is of great significance to improve the limitation procedure system of maritime claims liability and the practice of maritime judicial trial in China.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张勇健;钱晓晨;杨以生;;美国破产法若干问题聚焦[J];法律适用;2010年09期
2 宋锡祥;;论欧盟跨国破产法[J];法学评论;2007年04期
3 王利明;破产立法中的若干疑难问题探讨[J];法学;2005年03期
4 莫伟刚;海事赔偿责任限制的程序问题[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2005年04期
5 黄少彬;张旭;温文治;;国外跨国破产管辖制度及对我国立法的启示[J];湖南财政经济学院学报;2011年04期
6 周后春;屈广清;;海事赔偿责任限制的法律适用[J];世界海运;2006年02期
7 张洁;;浅析跨国破产的管辖权[J];合作经济与科技;2011年06期
8 季立刚;解正山;;美国跨国破产立法的最新发展及对我国的借鉴意义[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
9 张海征;;试述我国破产财产清偿制度——以英国破产制度为视角[J];中国市场;2008年01期
10 毕丹华;;沉船沉物强制打捞清除中的若干法律问题[J];水运管理;2007年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 洪燕;海事赔偿责任限制程序相关法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2011年
2 贺洪龙;海事赔偿责任限制程序问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2007年
3 胡杏军;我国海事赔偿责任限制程序完善研究[D];大连海事大学;2009年
4 贾楠;CMI《责任限制程序规则指南》对完善我国相关立法之借鉴[D];大连海事大学;2010年
5 李妍;海事赔偿责任限制制度若干问题研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
，本文编号：2370133
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2370133.html
