债权让与无因性之探讨
发布时间：2019-04-23 13:34
【摘要】：无因性原则的意义主要体现在商法领域有价证券的连续让与中,对指名债权让与受让人安全地位的保障作用意义不大。如果以无因性原则构成证券化债权安全流通的基础这一事实为由强调民法上的指名债权让与也应承认无因性原则,从逻辑上来说不能成立。尽管有因无因的选择更多的是一个立法政策的问题,但如果从与我国物权变动模式保持一致及价值判断的角度分析,不承认指名债权让与的无因性应是我国的较好选择。即指名债权让与并不具有无因性,我国传统民法理论当然的将无因性阐述为债权让与的重要特征是错误的,对此应予以修正。
[Abstract]:The significance of the principle of dimensionless is mainly reflected in the continuous transfer of securities in the field of commercial law, but it is of little significance to the security status of the transferee and the transferee of the named creditor's right. Based on the fact that the principle of non-causation constitutes the basis of the safe circulation of securitized creditor's rights, the assignment of named creditor's rights in civil law should also be recognized as the principle of non-causation, which is logically untenable. Although the choice of cause and no reason is more of a legislative policy, if it is analyzed from the angle of consistency with the change mode of real right in our country and value judgment, it should be a better choice for our country not to recognize the non-causation of the assignment of named creditor's right. That is to say, the assignment of named creditor's right does not have no cause. The traditional civil law theory of our country, of course, is wrong in expounding the non-causation as the important characteristic of the assignment of creditor's right, which should be amended.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学法学院
【基金】：司法部2005年度中青年项目“债权让与制度研究”的阶段性成果(05SFB3015)
【分类号】：D913
[Abstract]:The significance of the principle of dimensionless is mainly reflected in the continuous transfer of securities in the field of commercial law, but it is of little significance to the security status of the transferee and the transferee of the named creditor's right. Based on the fact that the principle of non-causation constitutes the basis of the safe circulation of securitized creditor's rights, the assignment of named creditor's rights in civil law should also be recognized as the principle of non-causation, which is logically untenable. Although the choice of cause and no reason is more of a legislative policy, if it is analyzed from the angle of consistency with the change mode of real right in our country and value judgment, it should be a better choice for our country not to recognize the non-causation of the assignment of named creditor's right. That is to say, the assignment of named creditor's right does not have no cause. The traditional civil law theory of our country, of course, is wrong in expounding the non-causation as the important characteristic of the assignment of creditor's right, which should be amended.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学法学院
【基金】：司法部2005年度中青年项目“债权让与制度研究”的阶段性成果(05SFB3015)
【分类号】：D913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 段卫华,胡海涛;票据无因性原则之理论探讨及其立法完善[J];河北法学;2005年09期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李琛;;禁止知识产权滥用的若干基本问题研究[J];电子知识产权;2007年12期
2 屈茂辉;;不动产登记申请的法理与规则[J];法学研究;2007年02期
3 朱广新;;地役权概念的体系性解读[J];法学研究;2007年04期
4 吴国U，
本文编号：2463513
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2463513.html
