程序性事项释明之探析——以首例冷冻胚胎案为例

发布时间：2017-12-28 09:34

本文关键词：程序性事项释明之探析——以首例冷冻胚胎案为例　出处：《江苏行政学院学报》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在诉讼过程中,基于明确诉讼方向、防止突袭裁判及彻底解决纠纷等目的,法官应就若干程序性事项对当事人进行释明。在诉讼请求不明确甚至自相矛盾时应进行释明,在当事人不适格时应释明,在法院变更案由时应释明,在原告没有诉的利益时应释明,在例外情况下超请求裁判时也应进行释明。这些释明可让原告及时调整诉的声明,使原告正确列明当事人,使双方当事人就变更后的案由充分争讼,还能避免可能的后续诉讼。如是观之,首例冷冻胚胎案中的释明还有进一步充实之空间。
[Abstract]:In the process of litigation, litigation, clear direction to prevent and resolve disputes trial based on the aim, the judge should have some procedural issues of interpretation of the parties. The claim is not clear and even contradictory interpretation should be carried out, the parties should not be qualified in the interpretation, the court should change the interpretation, the plaintiff did not in the interests of suit should clarify, in exceptional circumstances over the referee should also be clarification request. This interpretation allows the timely adjustment of declaration of litigation, the plaintiff correctly specified parties, both parties will be made after the change of the full of litigation, but also avoid the possible follow-up action. In view of the case, the first case of frozen embryos and further enrich the space.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1
【正文快照】： 在民事诉讼中,如果当事人的诉讼行为不明确,法官应当要求其澄清或说明,法官甚至在必要时还应提示当事人补充、更正诉讼资料或变更诉讼行为。法官的这种活动就是所谓的释明(阐明)。释明有的是关于实体问题的,有的则是关于程序问题的。前者通常是关于权利的释明,而后者则可能涉

【相似文献】