论认定财产无主程序

发布时间：2018-01-02 02:08

本文关键词：论认定财产无主程序　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：作为我国非讼程序的一种,认定财产无主程序对于无主财产权属关系的重构与恢复有着重大的意义。然而,司法实践中对其应用相对较少,且在适用的过程中该程序本身也存在着诸多问题,以至于对物权关系的应有作用很难展现出来。之所以有此种法律适用上的困难,立法规则的粗陋是根源,主要包括:法律规定中概念的模糊、法律规则的笼统、与实体法中相关程序的衔接不明确,与实体法中相关规定有冲突。正是因为认定财产无主程序在司法实践中暴露出了这些问题,使得该程序如今的处境比较尴尬。再加上长期重实体、轻程序的惯性思维,一些学者甚至认为该程序完全可以从民事诉讼法中删掉。笔者在分析一些认定财产无主程序的案例中暴露出的问题的基础上,对该程序的缺陷进行尽可能全面的解剖,并且以方便实现该程序“物尽其用”的价值为目的,就怎样设置能使认定财产无主程序更科学、更合理提出笔者自己的建议。在文章的构思上,第一部分是对认定财产无主程序的详细概述。首先对认定财产无主程序的含义和条件进行阐述。其次,对其审理程序进行论述。其中分三个小部分,分别为:认定财产无主的启动程序;审查请求和发出公告;案件的判决。最后,是认定财产无主案件的救济程序。第二部分为认定财产无主的实例剖析。这一部分首先列举上海、山东、北京的三个认定财产无主的案件,并分别分析这三个案例中反映出的认定财产无主程序中的一些问题。然后对其进行深入、全面的分析认定财产无主程序存在的缺陷:法律规则笼统;法律概念的模糊;与实体法中相关程序衔接不明确;与实体法中的相关规定不统一等等。第三部分是对规范与完善现行认定财产无主程序的设想。其一,了解认定财产无主程序的原理;其二,基于第二部分的缺陷分析,提出规范与完善认定财产无主程序的构想。
[Abstract]:As a kind of noncontentious procedure, determining the property without the main program for the reconstruction of main property relationships is of great significance and recovery. However, in judicial practice, the application is relatively small, and in the application process of the program itself also has many problems, and should have effect on the relationship of property right it is difficult to show. This is the law applicable difficulty, legislative rules humble is the root, mainly including: the law of fuzzy concepts, general rules, procedures and cohesion in the substantive law is not clear, there is a conflict with relevant substantive law provisions. It is because the determination of ownerless property procedure in judicial practice exposed to these problems, the program makes the situation now embarrassing. Coupled with the long-term heavy entity light procedure, the inertia of thinking, some scholars even think that the program can completely from the civil litigation Delete the litigation law. Based on analysis of some exposed the author finds no property of the main program in the case of problems and defects of the program will make a comprehensive anatomy, and to facilitate the implementation of the program "best" value for the purpose of how to identify the property without setting can make the main program more scientific more reasonable, I put forward my own suggestions. In the design, the first part is a detailed overview of the main program without determining the property. The meaning and conditions of the main program without first determining the property described. Secondly, this paper elaborates on its trial procedure. Which is divided into three small parts, respectively: the property has been determined the main starting procedure; review request and issued a notice; the decision in the case. Finally, is the determination of ownerless property case relief program. The second part is the case analysis of determination of ownerless property. This part of the first list of Shanghai, Shandong, Three Beijing finds the property without the main case, and analysis finds the property reflects the three cases without some of the problems in the main program. Then its in-depth, comprehensive analysis finds no property defect programs exist: the rule of law in general; fuzzy concept of law; substantive law and related the program interface is not clear; not unified with the relevant provisions of substantive law and so on. The third part is to regulate imagination and improve the main program. The current determination of property, understand the principle of determining the property without the main program; second, defect analysis based on the second part of the proposed, standardize and improve the concept of property without the main program that.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】