反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-02 02:32

本文关键词：反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度研究　出处：《郑州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国《反垄断法》从实施至今已经有七年了,反垄断民事诉讼案件却屈指可数,在屈指可数的案件中大多数还是以原告的败诉或撤诉结束的。其中有些案件的确无论是在证据还是法律上都是不能得到法官支持的,但也不乏一些案件是因为我国反垄断民事诉讼制度设计的不完善,导致本应该被保护的法益没有被保护。证明制度作为民事诉讼的重要制度之一其对反垄断民事诉讼案件的影响尤其重要。本文通过对反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度的分析研究,结合我国的法律和司法实践现状对我国反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度提出一些建议,以促进《反垄断法》的顺利实施,保护市场竞争,保护社会公共利益,保护消费者的合法权益,最终保证我国市场经济的可持续发展。首先对反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度的概念、特征、功能等进行分析。通过反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度的概念和特征分析,明确了什么是反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度,反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度和一般民事诉讼证明制度上存在差异。反垄断民事诉讼当事人诉讼能力的悬殊,证明对象的多样性,证明责任的特殊性,证据的复杂性等特征都要求反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度在具体的制度设计上要同一般的民事诉讼制度有所不同。通过对反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度的功能等分析,说明该制度对于反垄断民事诉讼具有重要性。其次,对国外的反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度进行了对比研究,包括证明责任、证明标准、证据开示制度、专家证人制度以及反垄断执法机构决议的效力的研究和介绍。通过对国外一些先进制度的研究和介绍,以期使我国相对落后的证明制度进行一定的借鉴和学习。然后,对我国反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度的法律规定和司法实践进行了分析,主要是对证明对象、证明责任和证明标准进行了深入的解析,在我国基本国情的基础上,通过对国外制度的借鉴指出了我国反垄断民事诉讼中证明制度在证明责任、证明标准、证据收集和类型、法院组织机构及与反垄断行政决议效力等方面存在的不足和缺陷。最后,结合我国的反垄断诉讼司法实践、法律制度,在构建证明责任和证明标准制度、探索引进国外先进制度、完善法院组织机构等方面提出了合理建议。促进我国建立更加合理完善的反垄断民事诉讼证据制度。
[Abstract]:It has been seven years since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law in China, but the number of civil antitrust litigation cases is few. Most of the few cases ended in the plaintiff's defeat or withdrawal. Some of these cases did not have the support of a judge either in evidence or in law. But there are also some cases because of the imperfect design of our anti-monopoly civil litigation system. The legal interests which should be protected have not been protected. As one of the important systems in civil action, the proof system is especially important to the antitrust civil litigation cases. The analytical research. Combined with the current situation of our country's law and judicial practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the proof system in our country's antitrust civil litigation, in order to promote the smooth implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law, protect the market competition and protect the social and public interests. To protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and ultimately to ensure the sustainable development of our market economy. First of all, the concept and characteristics of proof system in antitrust civil litigation. Through the analysis of the concept and characteristics of the proof system in the antitrust civil action, it is clear what is the proof system in the antitrust civil action. There are differences between the proof system in antitrust civil action and the proof system in general civil action. The great disparity of litigant's litigation ability in antitrust civil action, the diversity of the object of proof and the particularity of the burden of proof. The complexity of evidence and other characteristics require that the system of proof in antitrust civil action should be different from that of ordinary civil litigation in the specific system design. This paper analyzes the function of proof system in antitrust civil action. . Explain the importance of the system for antitrust civil action. Secondly, the foreign antitrust civil litigation in the system of proof of comparative research, including the burden of proof, standards of proof, evidence discovery system. Research and introduction of expert witness system and the effectiveness of antitrust law enforcement agency. Through the research and introduction of some advanced systems abroad. In order to make our country relatively backward certification system for reference and learning. Then, the article analyzes the legal provisions and judicial practice of the proof system in the civil antitrust litigation, mainly on the object of proof. The burden of proof and the standard of proof are deeply analyzed. On the basis of the basic national conditions of our country, this paper points out the burden of proof and the standard of proof in the civil action of antitrust in our country through the reference of the foreign system. Evidence collection and types, court organization and the effectiveness of antitrust administrative resolutions and other aspects of the shortcomings and defects. Finally, combined with our judicial practice of antitrust litigation, the legal system. The author puts forward some reasonable suggestions on how to construct the system of burden of proof and standard of proof, to explore the introduction of foreign advanced systems, and to perfect the organization of the court, so as to promote the establishment of a more reasonable and perfect system of evidence in civil action against monopoly in China.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.13;D922.294

【参考文献】