刑事和解适用之实体条件

发布时间：2018-01-04 02:38

本文关键词：刑事和解适用之实体条件　出处：《湖南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：刑诉法在特别程序中规定了刑事和解适用的一般法定条件,而在司法实践中被简化为两大条件即属于符合法定范围的刑事案件、赔偿损失签订刑事和解协议,只要符合这两大条件的案件,就适用刑事和解予以从宽处理,这导致犯罪嫌疑人、被告人是“真”和解还是“假”和解难以判断,这自然使该制度难脱人民群众“以钱赎刑”之质疑。这不仅使该制度设计之初的期待值大幅降低,同时也削弱了刑罚的预防功能。刑事和解实体条件是隐藏在法定条件之中的,法定条件包括属于特定案件范围,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人真诚悔罪,取得被害人谅解,五年内没有故意犯罪,这些无不在昭示着适用刑事和解要求具备两个实体条件即行为社会危害性较小、行为人人身危险性低。从理论上分析社会危害性小、人身危险性低在刑事和解中的功能,也为适用刑事和解可以从宽处罚提供了刑法理论上的支撑。如何在实践中把握实体条件,如何将刑事和解实体条件适用于具体案件中,首先在把握法定条件,因为法定条件即为实体条件的具体化,同时也要注意实体条件对刑事和解适用的制约作用,如无悔改之意的单纯赔偿是不能成为证明行为人身危险性较小的事实。其次对于社会危害性小、人身危险性低的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不能一刀切的全部适用免除、从轻或减轻处罚,需要结合刑法对犯罪情节不同相对应不同处理结果的规定来确定刑事和解案件犯罪嫌疑人是法定不起诉、酌定不起诉还是免除处罚、从轻或减轻处罚。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law stipulates the general legal conditions for the application of criminal reconciliation in the special procedure, but in judicial practice, it is simplified into two major conditions, that is, the criminal case that conforms to the legal scope, and the criminal settlement agreement is signed to compensate for the loss. As long as these two conditions meet the case, the application of criminal reconciliation should be lenient, which leads to the criminal suspects, the accused is "true" reconciliation or "false" reconciliation difficult to judge. This naturally makes the system difficult to get rid of the people's question of "penalization with money", which not only makes the initial expectations of the system greatly reduced. At the same time, it also weakens the preventive function of the penalty. The substantive conditions of criminal reconciliation are hidden in the legal conditions. The legal conditions include the specific case scope, the criminal suspects and the accused sincere repentance. To obtain understanding of victims, no intentional crime within five years, these all show that the application of criminal reconciliation requires that there are two substantive conditions, that is, the conduct of social harm is relatively small. In theory, the author analyzes the function of low social harmfulness and low personal danger in the process of criminal reconciliation. Also for the application of criminal reconciliation can be lenient punishment to provide the theoretical support of criminal law. How to grasp the substantive conditions in practice, how to apply the substantive conditions of criminal reconciliation in specific cases, first of all in the grasp of legal conditions. Because the legal conditions are the materialization of the substantive conditions, at the same time, we should pay attention to the substantive conditions of the criminal reconciliation of the application of constraints. If the simple compensation without repentance can not become the fact that the behavior is less dangerous. Secondly, it is a criminal suspect with small social harm and low personal risk. The defendant can not be all applicable to the exemption, lenient or mitigated punishment, need to combine the criminal law with different circumstances corresponding to different treatment results to determine the criminal reconciliation case suspects are legal not to prosecute. Discretion not to prosecute or exempt from punishment, lighter or mitigated punishment.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】