论我国刑事审判中交叉询问制度的完善

发布时间：2018-01-14 13:00

本文关键词：论我国刑事审判中交叉询问制度的完善　出处：《辽宁大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在英美法系当事人主义的诉讼模式下,交叉询问制度被称为查明案件真实情况的重要“引擎”。我国于1996年对刑事诉讼法进行了第一次修改,就是在这次修改中,我国的交叉询问制度初现模型,同时,这次修改也使庭审模式发生了转变,即开始由职权主义向当事人主义转变。从此,学术界对交叉询问制度的研究开始走向独立和专门的研究阶段,研究交叉询问制度的文章和专著也相继出现。我国2012年对刑事诉讼法的第二次修改,对交叉询问的相关制度进行了完善,如律师辩护制度、证人出庭制度、法律援助制度等,这进一步为建立我国的交叉询问制度提供了条件。本文从交叉询问的内涵、功能入手,通过对美国、日本代表性国家该制度的发展情况进行介绍,来研究我国刑事审判中交叉询问制度的不足,进而提出完善我国刑事审判中交叉询问制度的构想。论文正文分为四部分：第一部分主要介绍交叉询问制度的概念和功能。一般来说,交叉询问的概念主要有广义和狭义两个,本论文是从广义的交叉询问概念进行论述。交叉询问制度有三大主要功能：一是发现事实；二是最大限度保障被告人的权利；三是实现了程序公正。第二部分通过介绍域外代表性国家,包括美国和日本的交叉询问制度,总结出我国在完善这一制度时的可借鉴之处。其中,美国的交叉询问制度主要从询问的主体、顺序、对象、制度保障、规则等方面进行介绍；对日本的交叉询问制度的介绍则是从与英美法系国家的区别入手,主要论述了该制度在日本发展的不同之处。最后将美日两个国家的交叉询问制度进行比较从而得出可供我国完善该制度的借鉴之处。第三部分主要指出了我国交叉询问制度所存在的问题,主要有询问顺序混乱不清、运行规则尚付阙如、配套制度不完善。针对第三部分存在的问题,在第四部分中提出了解决方案和完善构想。
[Abstract]:Under the litigant mode of Anglo-American law system, cross-examination system is regarded as an important "engine" to find out the true situation of the case. In 1996, our criminal procedure law was amended for the first time. It is in this revision, the cross-examination system of our initial model, at the same time, the revision of the trial mode has also changed, that is, the beginning of the shift from the doctrine of authority to the party doctrine. The academic research on cross-questioning system began to be independent and specialized, and the articles and monographs of cross-questioning system appeared one after another. In 2012, our country revised the criminal procedure law for the second time. The related system of cross-examination has been improved, such as lawyer defense system, witness court system, legal aid system and so on. This further provides the conditions for the establishment of cross-questioning system in China. This paper starts with the connotation and function of cross-questioning and introduces the development of the system in the representative countries of the United States and Japan. To study the shortcomings of cross-examination system in our country's criminal trial. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly introduces the concept and function of cross-questioning system. Generally speaking. There are two main concepts of cross-questioning: broad sense and narrow sense. This paper discusses the concept of cross-questioning from a broad sense. The system of cross-questioning has three main functions: first, discovering facts; The second is to protect the rights of the defendant to the maximum extent; The second part of the introduction of the extraterritorial representative countries, including the United States and Japan's cross-inquiry system, summed up our country in the improvement of this system can be used for reference. The system of cross-questioning in the United States is mainly introduced from the subject, order, object, system guarantee, rules and so on. The introduction to the system of cross-inquiry in Japan starts with the differences between Japan and Anglo-American law countries. This paper mainly discusses the differences in the development of the system in Japan. Finally, the author compares the cross-inquiry system between the United States and Japan to draw lessons for our country to perfect the system. The third part mainly points out the exchange between China and Japan. The problems existing in the system of cross-questioning. In view of the problems existing in the third part, the author puts forward the solution and the perfect conception in the 4th part.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】